Rant The Son is the head of the Christian Church.

James

Puritanical Christianist
The Pope is not the head of the Christian Church. The Son is the head of the Christian Church.

The Christian Church is not an earthly hierarchy under the authority of fallible men. The Christian Church is an egalitarian collective of Christian individuals working under the authority of the infallible Trinity to abolish non-Christianity.

The Christian Church was not meant to be hierarchical or divided. Catholicism, Orthodoxy, and Protestantism must work through their differences collectively to restore the unity of the true Christian Church.
 
Yes, every individual needs to adopt the Protestant way. Those hierarchies of heretics in shiny suits are non-Christian.
Nigga you have the Luther rose in your pfp, you cannot, in good conscience, say shit like this while wearing the emblem of a church that's 99% identical to the Catholic Church
 
Wouldn't it be better for christclits to unite?
"Uniting" with heretics would only bring heresy (and from it, suffering) into the true faith through some sort of puny set of compromises for the sake of that "unity." We can observe this with what is going on in Constantinople right now, with Bartholomew.
 
Nigga you have the Luther rose in your pfp, you cannot, in good conscience, say shit like this while wearing the emblem of a church that's 99% identical to the Catholic Church
No, Martin Luther created the Luther Rose. I advocate for Martin Luther's ways.
 
"Uniting" with heretics would only bring heresy (and from it, suffering) into the true faith through some sort of puny set of compromises for the sake of that "unity."
Good point. Everyone needs to believe in the five solae before they can unite.
 
Nigga you have the Luther rose in your pfp, you cannot, in good conscience, say shit like this while wearing the emblem of a church that's 99% identical to the Catholic Church
What do you think of people who claim Luther was too old to accept and announce Calvinism as better than Lutheranism?
 
I didn't take you for an ecumenist James, how disappointing.
he does hold a point
discussing about who's the most legitimate or powerful church will only bring woe to christianity in the long run, with kikes wanting to annihilate christianity in the entirety of europe
 
he does hold a point
discussing about who's the most legitimate or powerful church will only bring woe to christianity in the long run, with kikes wanting to annihilate christianity in the entirety of europe
Yes, Martin Luther's movement was called the Reformation, not the Separation. Martin Luther wanted the Catholic Church to reform to the ways of Primitive Christianity.
 
he does hold a point
discussing about who's the most legitimate or powerful church will only bring woe to christianity in the long run, with kikes wanting to annihilate christianity in the entirety of europe
Catholics and protestants are not christians and what they call churches are not churches. No doubt some of them sincerely have faith, but so does a Muslim. It doesn't make them any less wrong. So that's that. Your statement also reveals you don't care about preserving the faith that the Apostles handed down to us, because you'd easily make compromises on matters that concern the salvation of humanity for the sake of a heretical union. You care more about "europe" than Apostolic Doctrine.

Here's the problem: When you think of "Christianity" you are thinking of every single denomination in existence which identifies with that title. Your idea is that it's all just different branches of the same tree. This is not true and it's not the attitude anyone from any denomination had prior to the ecumenical movement. Because to us Christianity is Orthodoxy and Orthodoxy is Christianity.

I suppose if I had to explain this in secular terms, I'd say you're falling for the religious department of globalization efforts, supporting the kikes you claim to be against. Globalization goes hand in hand with ecumenism and "christian unity" which will, in time, include other religions into the mix. Your pope blesses hindu temples and meets with buddhists. There's a reason for all of that.
^ Here, your fellow catholic saying the same thing. I thought this would make it more convincing considering you don't take me seriously.
 
Jesus is the real head, not some Jesuit in a dress. The Christian Church shouldn’t be this earthly hierarchy with men lording over others, it’s supposed to be an egalitarian collective, all working under the Trinity to spread the real truth, not to play power games. Catholicism, Orthodoxy, Protestantism; they’re all divided cause of man-made bullshit, not God’s will. They need to get their shit together, stop the infighting, and restore the unity of the church like it was meant to be.
 
Christianity is Orthodoxy and Orthodoxy is Christianity.
No, the writings of the Apostolic Fathers are not the word of the Trinity. The writings of the Apostolic Fathers are the words of the Apostolic Fathers. The Holy Scriptures condemns the formation of clergical hierarchies and the practice of man-made rituals and man-made traditions.

The Orthodox Church does not represent the true Christian Church. The Orthodox Church needs reformation.
 
No, the writings of the Apostolic Fathers are not the word of the Trinity. The writings of the Apostolic Fathers are the words of the Apostolic Fathers. The Holy Scriptures condemns the formation of clergical hierarchies and the practice of man-made rituals and man-made traditions.

The Orthodox Church does not represent the true Christian Church. The Orthodox Church needs reformation.
Mankind has one Father: The Father in Heaven.
 
Your statement also reveals you don't care about preserving the faith that the Apostles handed down to us, because you'd easily make compromises on matters that concern the salvation of humanity for the sake of a heretical union. You care more about "europe" than Apostolic Doctrine.
you aren't completely wrong on the fact that i take people over religion over matters that compromise the safety of society, but i meant my statement more as saying that bickering over interpretations of the faith and going over wars over it with only diminish the prevalence and belief of the religion in the population, there will be no christendom when the few believers of the religion are siding with one side or the other and murdering themselves over it, it stops being a struggle for god and it becomes a struggle for the ego of various organizations. declaring war over those interpretations is useless and there were wars between different people of different churches before but 90% of them were due to political issues rather than because of religious differences

it is true that there is only one true interpretation of the faith, which it is its bound to be known sooner or later, but until then, going to war over it instead of reaching a common logical conclusion won't lead to its revelation, and those men will keep murdering themselves
Here's the problem: When you think of "Christianity" you are thinking of every single denomination in existence which identifies with that title. Your idea is that it's all just different branches of the same tree. This is not true and it's not the attitude anyone from any denomination had prior to the ecumenical movement. Because to us Christianity is Orthodoxy and Orthodoxy is Christianity.
if the faith of christianity came from the records and documents from various men about the messiah and his miracles then why wouldn't they be all branches of the same tree? its the worship of the lord and his creations, and as i said before, there is only one truth about his word, only one interpretation that can be considered truly non-heretical
as you said too, christianity is orthodoxy and orthodoxy is christianity, so wouldn't that be answer to all the questions surrounding it? the same could be said for protestanism and catholicism, they all search for the true interpretation of the bible at the end of the day
I suppose if I had to explain this in secular terms, I'd say you're falling for the religious department of globalization efforts, supporting the kikes you claim to be against. Globalization goes hand in hand with ecumenism and "christian unity" which will, in time, include other religions into the mix. Your pope blesses hindu temples and meets with buddhists. There's a reason for all of that.
i didn't admit to being a full-on supporter of the ecumenist movement, but i do see the futility of trying to make one church dominant over the other, what i meant is there shouldn't be bloodbaths over the word of the lord and instead there shouldn't be COMPLETE unity but atleast acknowledgement that they're all believers of the same actions and the same man
catholic, protestant, orthodoxy etc, they're organizations made by man that have devolved into involvement on politics and as tools to promote certain discourses on the population, as @Negrobud said that will only lead to the destruction of his true and only gospel, which would be the earliest recordings of the bible, and that its writings are the only canons that we should follow, jesus is the one that saves
 
you aren't completely wrong on the fact that i take people over religion
No, the Trinity is more important than the Trinity's creations.
they all search for the true interpretation of the bible at the end of the day
No, the Catholic and Orthodox Churches follow the Holy Scriptures as close as the Gnostic and Mormon Churches follow the Holy Scriptures. These churches are being heretical on purpose.
 
you aren't completely wrong on the fact that i take people over religion over matters that compromise the safety of society, but i meant my statement more as saying that bickering over interpretations of the faith and going over wars over it with only diminish the prevalence and belief of the religion in the population, there will be no christendom when the few believers of the religion are siding with one side or the other and murdering themselves over it, it stops being a struggle for god and it becomes a struggle for the ego of various organizations. declaring war over those interpretations is useless and there were wars between different people of different churches before but 90% of them were due to political issues rather than because of religious differences

it is true that there is only one true interpretation of the faith, which it is its bound to be known sooner or later, but until then, going to war over it instead of reaching a common logical conclusion won't lead to its revelation, and those men will keep murdering themselves

if the faith of christianity came from the records and documents from various men about the messiah and his miracles then why wouldn't they be all branches of the same tree? its the worship of the lord and his creations, and as i said before, there is only one truth about his word, only one interpretation that can be considered truly non-heretical
as you said too, christianity is orthodoxy and orthodoxy is christianity, so wouldn't that be answer to all the questions surrounding it? the same could be said for protestanism and catholicism, they all search for the true interpretation of the bible at the end of the day

i didn't admit to being a full-on supporter of the ecumenist movement, but i do see the futility of trying to make one church dominant over the other, what i meant is there shouldn't be bloodbaths over the word of the lord and instead there shouldn't be COMPLETE unity but atleast acknowledgement that they're all believers of the same actions and the same man
catholic, protestant, orthodoxy etc, they're organizations made by man that have devolved into involvement on politics and as tools to promote certain discourses on the population, as @Negrobud said that will only lead to the destruction of his true and only gospel, which would be the earliest recordings of the bible, and that its writings are the only canons that we should follow, jesus is the one that saves
1744862536640.webp
 
Back
Top