Books/Articles "The LGBT problem" - The Futurist State

SiegeChud

Well-known member
its in my personal opinion that every single one of you read the futurst state by timothy turtle its only 87 pages and should only take you a single day at most to complete it





A growing problem in the world is the LGBT movement, its funding, promotion, and adoption. The US spends billions to promote the movement in Africa and the Middle East. Most recently, in the nation of Zambia, the Zambian president refused and expelled the US Government; the US Government was attempting to bribe the president with $500 million to legalize and promote the LGBT movement to his people. LGBT propaganda is so heavily promoted in Africa that there are militias of Africans dedicated to fighting against it. This includes groups like “Boko Haram” which roughly translates to “Western Education is Evil” or “The West is Evil.
I remember looking over a leaked document from the US Embassy in Estonia that was on Wikileaks. The staff of the embassy openly bragged about working with various groups in Estonia such as NGOs, teachers, government officials, and alike to promote multiculturalism and homosexuality to the youth. All of this was because a gay mullato Cuban complained about how badly he was treated by the Estonian locals for being a homosexual mixed-race mutt. The embassy staff felt that Estonia needed to change to suit American perversions---I mean interests.
1744477270567.webp
1744477279816.webp


This was back in 2006, by the way. This was under the Bush Administration, which promoted itself as “for the interests of God”. No matter what party is in charge, the Jewish interests remain the same. The same thing happened under Trump; the $500 million dollar bribe in Zambia was under his presidency. Now one might ask themselves, why is the US going out of its way, paying billions of dollars, and using advanced psychological warfare operations to promote this shit? Simple! Money. Faggotry is consumerism and materialism taken to the extreme. Faggots are the final form of the evolution of the consumer. They are narcissistic and hedonistic, with short term pleasure as their false idol. To be a degenerate one must first disregard family and religion. All that remains is a lifeless husk where their soul once was. They use products and cum to fill the void in their soul. This is why corporations publicly promote this disgusting stuff. There is no big conspiracy to screw over white people. They do it because it’s more profitable.
For example, there is Pfizer. Pfizer is one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world. Diseased homosexuals and mutilated transvestites require a mountain of expensive medications to live. Pfizer sells these expensive medications, such as HIV meds, that are essential to many homosexuals. They sell transvestite estrogen pills, antidepressants, and the like. Pfizer is unsurprisingly a corporate sponsor for LGBT groups like Human Rights Campaign. They are supporting their paying customers.
The same pattern applies to technology companies, fast food companies, peak consumer companies like Amazon, and more. They have a vested interest in promoting degeneracy. This is because degenerates are unstable and miserable; they are easily manipulated by corporate advertising propaganda to spend more money than healthy, happy people.
The transvestite is the absolute peak consumer. They spend absurd amounts of money on medications, surgeries, clothing, tech, and more. Every transvestite I’ve ever met has based their lives around consumerism; they viciously attack anyone who threatens their consumption based “sexual identity”. It’s no wonder why so many of them are anti-fascists; we’re the anti-consumer and they feel threatened by us ending the system they depend on for pharmaceuticals, surgeries, and survival.
The average mutilation surgery can total more than $50,000. The price is expected to rise due to increasing demand. The transgender population in the US is around 1.4 million people. Basic math tells us that’s around $70 billion just for surgeries. This isn’t even including medication. Daily, they must consume drugs ranging from antidepressants to artificial hormones.
It’s a well-known fact that these people all suffer from severe depression. They have an absurdly high suicide attempt rate of 50%! With 1.4 million US transgenders, 700,000 of them will attempt to kill themselves at least once in their lifetimes. I don’t understand how anyone can call this normal. It’s a mental illness. It was recognized as such until it started being accepted and promoted by the elite once they realized they could make billions off of other people’s mental illness and suffering. It’s sick! Yet, these same sadistic sickos and pharmaceutical perverts call us cruel and immoral!
Now they’re promoting this to children! New, expensive medications are on the market such as “hormone blockers.” Imagine a young boy whose sick mother forces him on this stuff! What would it do to him? Well, it would prevent him from going into puberty. When he hits the age of puberty he would be put on artificial female hormones, which are derived from horse urine due to its high estrogen content. When he reaches adulthood, he will go through Sexual Reassignment Surgery. The “surgeon” turns his penis inside out to simulate a vaginal hole! This is madness and it only profits the corporations pushing this twisted shit.
We saw this with the “Transgender Child Star and Activist” Jazz Jennings. Those who grow up as transgender and are mutated by the medications, their penis doesn’t grow. It’s permanently stuck at toddler size. The doctors improvise the surgery. Instead of using the penis to create a hole, the colon is simply rerouted to the front. In other words, they take your asshole and move it to the front of your body.
I know! What fun and “progressive” stuff to imagine! The marketing of transgender children is for two reasons. First, for maximum profit. With children, you can make money from cradle to grave off of someone rather than waiting until they’re a teenager or young adult to victimize them.
Secondly, it is to humiliate you. This transgender child stuff is the same exact shit the Ottomans did to the children of their conquered. It makes sense since the Turks and our Ashkenazi overlords are related genetically.
The Ottomans would take young boys from villages and “conscript them.” They’d neuter them like a dog to prevent puberty. Then, they would keep them as sex slaves for the Ottoman elite. Now, why would they do such a thing? Control. It was to instill in the population the ever-present idea: “If they can do this to our children whom we are supposed to protect, what else can they do to us?".
The answer? Anything. They do it because they know you don’t want it. They know it humiliates you by showing how weak you are and then they brag how you can’t stop them. We should treat this as an enemy occupation of our lands, not just a system that we hate. People who collaborate with them should be treated the same as you would the elites. There is no other way


This is also why things like Mass Movementism are stupid. You can’t beg your way to power in an occupation. You can only kill your occupiers and take back power. The faster we learn this, the faster we win.
 
LGBT propaganda is so heavily promoted in Africa that there are militias of Africans dedicated to fighting against it. This includes groups like “Boko Haram” which roughly translates to “Western Education is Evil” or “The West is Evil.
Wow. I recall someone on this forum saying they are attempting to do the same in Georgia. For something considered natural human behavior, you wouldn’t think it needed to be mass funded by the government to be accepted by society.
 
Wow. I recall someone on this forum saying they are attempting to do the same in Georgia. For something considered natural human behavior, you wouldn’t think it needed to be mass funded by the government to be accepted by society.
Like the $8 million they sent to Lesotho to promote LGBTQI+ stuff, which Trump called out cause no one even knows where the fuck that place is.
 
I checked out the book. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and presume this book is your first interaction with some things that are trite to me.

It is a weird mix.

Sometimes it feels like it is trying to win me over with "look at this pitiful thing! This system is evil!" whether it is a tortured animal/arab/tranny and then a little later there's "and so we need to continually hone the white man towards greatness with eternal warfare" The anti-animal cruelty take straight up says "let's use the human parasites for testing instead of animals" like what did I skim the part where jews are okay targets for torture but the abu ghraib stuff from earlier is still bad because it's arabs? Should I be considering arabs non-parasite because something something muh sovereign native aboriginal oil and natural gas (lobbying our politicians to give the white man the aryan luxury of multi-hour commutes) instead of however the jews get their share of the empire?

I understand there doesn't have to be contradiction here, but it all winds up evoking contradiction. Like with the eternal white war vs torture bad. Am I supposed to forget that war is tortuous? So we hate the arabic rapists of arabic children, what is our position on handling the white children once you kill their relatives in the eternal sharpening white-on-white war? Kill them quick and painlessly? Sure that's still way different from raping kids in my book but you can tell the moralizing doesn't feel put-together enough.

I don't entirely disagree with the intra-white conflict take, but if it is so then shouldn't I be really cautious about what is actually in the interest of my type of white? We aren't going to have a fair pie slicing of all the boundaries if we win, I shouldn't turn on the american empire unless I personally get something out of it. I don't know, maybe that's the point of this book- don't go do a some crazy shit, because that disadvantages your type of white after it is all over. Convince a latino to do it for me!

It just reads like propaganda from a manic 95 IQ psychopath, basically. We all have days where we can relate to that, right? I would prefer that the energy were put into poetry or novels where I can appreciate the contrast as character, when it isn't trying to convince me incoherently.

The author could have done more to sell me on the point of sharpening man, and specifically how his world would do this. Is warfare the soul? Is war just a means to keep everyone sharp so they make good music? Shouldn't we be very concerned with who we send to war and by what means people survive it or dodge the draft? Yeah some types just won't learn to aim a little higher, is that the root of the soul? A ballistic calculation?

This is also exactly the wrong sort of rhetoric you should put out if you actually wanted men to take up arms. "War is a trap to kill off the inferior, now go to war."

Also wars defenitely were NOT a means of culling the bad men in way back when, their wars were proportionally tiny. Total war, for instance, is a post-enlightenment development. I don't know whether that is another thing to throw on your "enlightenment bad" tally or on the "industrialization bad" tally or somewhere else.

This is also why things like Mass Movementism are stupid. You can’t beg your way to power in an occupation. You can only kill your occupiers and take back power. The faster we learn this, the faster we win.
Number still matter. So you need a bunch of people to take over the stuff that actually lets you rule, even if this were settled with guns only. If anything this means you need to find out how to propagandize the soldiers and veterans of this world- forget the rest. People say and I agree that this was what made BAP actually scary to the establishment- people were posting the book with medals, I think clearances too. Or maybe it is support personnel, guys doing maintenance on fighter jets and working out logistics for supply chains. At some point, it has to be called mass movement.

Doing a jan 6 is as pointless as walking behind a banner, and both are still somehow better than giving your opponents the gift of a martyr. The only time assassination has even came close to being advantageous to a partisan was donald trump, and honestly he might have been more harmful to the assassin's goals as a martyr than he will be as he ages. As for the people behind the scenes, are there any of them that couldn't be replaced by a bleeding heart liberal or two? Bureaucrats? Davos boomers? I honestly can't tell. Kill enough faceless drones and they start to amount to a celebrity martyr anyway.

The rational ignorance of the voter still applies to the outnumbered man of violence. It's an awful lot of work to find the right way waste your life on an unwanted gift to society, whether you choose the ballot or the bullet.
 
Back
Top