Sedavacantism

[Harlequin]

Do any of you believe in it? I personally do, although I'm not a Catholic. I have read many good articles on why Pope Bergoglio "Francis" is not the true pope and does not have the true powers of the Pontifex Maximus

Andrea Cionci: Father Natale Santonocito- “Bergoglio is the anti-pope, Benedict XVI never made a renunciation of the papacy”

Father Natale: another priest cries out that Bergoglio is not the pope

popehead.substack.com

Andrea Cionci: Benedict XVI's resignation is null and void: application to Vatican tribunal

An announcement from Andrea Cionci

popehead.substack.com

The gnostic antipope must be stopped or he will use witchcraft to doom the entire world to hell for 8000 years!

 

[1Based Frog1]

Sedevacantism is just a Catholic cope for the obvious reality that Vatican II destroyed their church. They admit the pope is illegitimate but still cling to the idea that there was some true Catholicism that was lost instead of realizing the whole system was flawed from the start.

 

[cyber7878]

Begome Lutheran. If dislike papal corruption this much, might as well join the 500 year old institution specially built to fight against it, rather than the institutionless larper group founded in the 1960s.

 

[Dremora]

I think it's just a cope, but I do respect sedevacantism more than I'd respect normal catholicism.

 

[James]

The modern Catholic Church was established during the Gregorian Reform. A modern Catholic's munus has always been superficial. A modern Catholic's ministerium has always been superficial. Modern Catholicism has always been a superficial religion. All modern antipopes and modern popes were antichrists.

 

[Harlequin]

Sedevacantism is just a Catholic cope for the obvious reality that Vatican II destroyed their church. They admit the pope is illegitimate but still cling to the idea that there was some true Catholicism that was lost instead of realizing the whole system was flawed from the start.

I don't believe Vatican II destroyed the church, I believe only this current pope is an antipope. Benedict was a legitimate pope.

 

[SiegeChud]

cope for papists

 

[Dirty House Pest]

cope for papists

Catholic here, this is true.

I don't believe Vatican II destroyed the church, I believe only this current pope is an antipope. Benedict was a legitimate pope.

I do agree with you but from the studying (optimistic) I've done there seems to have been a massive change in regard to the Church's stance after the forming of the Second Council on the Old Covenant and the Jews as a whole, and I simply do not agree with their current stance on the matter.

 

[OdessanBvll]

Catholicucks...

 

[1Based Frog1]

I don't believe Vatican II destroyed the church, I believe only this current pope is an antipope. Benedict was a legitimate pope.

So your line in the sand is Francis? Not John XXIII, not Paul VI, not the modernist infiltration that started long before Vatican II? Benedict was a modernist too, just a slower one.

 

[Dremora]

>Begome Lutheran. If dislike papal corruption this much, might as well join the 500 year old institution specially built to fight against it, rather than the institutionless larper group founded in the 1960s.

 

[Harlequin]

So your line in the sand is Francis? Not John XXIII, not Paul VI, not the modernist infiltration that started long before Vatican II? Benedict was a modernist too, just a slower one.

That's not what makes a pope illegitimate, it is the means by which they become pope.

 

[Otto Ernst Remer]

That's not what makes a pope illegitimate, it is the means by which they become pope.

why is sml your signature

 

[James]

That's not what makes a pope illegitimate, it is the means by which they become pope.

No, those are man-made rules. Popes are illegitimate on the Trinity's terms.

 

[1Based Frog1]

That's not what makes a pope illegitimate, it is the means by which they become pope.

You think if someone gets voted in “properly” but goes on to teach heresy and undermine the faith, that makes him valid just because the paperwork’s in order?

 

[Dremora]

You think if someone gets voted in “properly” but goes on to teach heresy and undermine the faith, that makes him valid just because the paperwork’s in order?

This attitude is not surprising at all, papist "saint" Catherine of Siena is recorded as making the following statement:

“Even if the Pope were Satan incarnate, we ought not to raise up our heads against him, but calmly lie down to rest on his bosom. He who rebels against our Father is condemned to death, for that which we do to him we do to Christ: we honor Christ if we honor the Pope; we dishonor Christ if we dishonor the Pope.”

Catholics worship the pope, not Christ. Jeremiah 17:5.

 

[cyber7878]

>Begome Lutheran. If dislike papal corruption this much, might as well join the 500 year old institution specially built to fight against it, rather than the institutionless larper group founded in the 1960s.
View attachment 6207

This is like looking at the Jesuits and thinking that the whole Catholic Church is like that. It's not exactly a fair comparison.

 

[Dremora]

This is like looking at the Jesuits and thinking that the whole Catholic Church is like that. It's not exactly a fair comparison.

It's the mainstream lutheran church of norway. Not only that, she's the bishop of Oslo, capital of the country. Stop coping.

 

[Dremora]

Jesuits

the whole Catholic Church is like that.

This is true by the way.

 

[cyber7878]

It's the mainstream lutheran church of norway. Not only that, she's the bishop of Oslo, capital of the country. Stop coping.

The jesuits aren't exactly obscure either. They're the largest existing catholic religious order. They probably have more people in them than the Norwegian state church, which is only as pozzed as it is today because the state is equally pozzed, which is why the churches in Finland, Latvia and Slovakia don't have that kind of problem.

This is true by the way.

What?

 

[Dremora]

The jesuits aren't exactly obscure either. They're the largest existing catholic religious order. They probably have more people in them than the Norwegian state church

Why do you keep bringing up catholics? What do they have to do with this?

which is only as pozzed as it is today because the state is equally pozzed, which is why the churches in Finland, Latvia and Slovakia don't have that kind of problem.

Hahaha okay. So I heard the archbishop of finland, Tapio Luoma, supports homosexual marriages. And there are female bishops in finland, so much for not having those kinds of problems... Finland is a super degenerate country in general. Awful example you gave there. Most Latvians are atheistic or indifferent in one way or another, it's hardly a protestant country.

Slovakia is okay I guess (Robert Fico is a cool guy), but it's a majority catholic country so idk what you're trying to prove by mentioning them. Am I supposed to take the tiny minority of lutheran slovaks as a role model?

Also...

Once again, a bad example.

What?

I said papism is gay.

 

[Harlequin]

You think if someone gets voted in “properly” but goes on to teach heresy and undermine the faith, that makes him valid just because the paperwork’s in order?

Valid, yes, but being a valid pope is not the same as being a good pope.