Roman-Catholicism is a plague upon christianity

OdessanBvll

Kike obliterator 271000
The roman catholicism literally believes that Pope has the right to change all the rules and do almost literally everything. There is a reason why Vatican is an independent state and it's totally because of all the things Papacy has to hide. Also don't forget about "monastic orders", it is known that freemasons make themselves similar "order" structures to. The Jesuits have been one of the strongest and biggest of them all with Jesuits being banned multiple times in a big amount of countries worldwide. Roman Catholic church also paints itself as the "biggest charity giver" to make people think good of them. Don't forget also that RCC remade certain old roman pagan temples into their churches, seems suspicious right?
Some people reject the modern pope, they call themselves sedevacantists saying that "There wasn't any good Pope since 2nd Council", retard there never really was a good pope, such thing as popery needs to be rejected completely, the fact that 1 figure that isn't Christ claims to rule over all of christians is literal heresy.
Screenshot_2025-02-11-15-10-09-647_com.android.chrome-edit.webp
 
Protestantism is merely the next step in its evolution. Papism ties that power to one man while protestantism gives it to just anyone so you can be your own pope. It's the same shit taken to another level.
Barely anyone ever in history of protestantism cared about church leaders
 
That's sort of the point, everyone is the church leader, everyone gets to write doctrine and start their own denomination or what have you
this was not the plan wifh Protestantism it was the reformation not revolution Martin Luther wanted to reform the church back on the basis of scripture being the highest authority and the removal of corruption catholics caused the reformation by not even letting him make a case and just kicking him out
 
this was not the plan wifh Protestantism it was the reformation not revolution Martin Luther wanted to reform the church back on the basis of scripture being the highest authority and the removal of corruption catholics caused the reformation by not even letting him make a case and just kicking him out
How can Scripture be the highest authority if the Scripture was compiled by the Church? And how can you have Scripture acting as the highest authority when the Scripture is ambiguous enough on its own to power thousands of different denomination all claiming to hold it as the highest authority?
 
How can Scripture be the highest authority if the Scripture was compiled by the Church? And how can you have Scripture acting as the highest authority when the Scripture is ambiguous enough on its own to power thousands of different denomination all claiming to hold it as the highest authority?
Scripture is infallible considering it’s the word of God and going against said scripture means you are acting against the word of God also your view is not held by any church so repent to your priest or some shit so this argument is wrong
 
Scripture is infallible considering it’s the word of God and going against said scripture means you are acting against the word of God also your view is not held by any church so repent to your priest or some shit so this argument is wrong
Different denominations is not an argument against sola scripture as it’s traditionally understood because most denominations after classical Protestantism that came out either believed in genuine heresy (mornonism) or where caused by politics rather then religious differences and the denominations just never saw a reason to combine each other because they already believe the other denomination is saved considering they adhere to the nicene creed
 
Scripture is infallible considering it’s the word of God and going against said scripture means you are acting against the word of God
Correct
your view is not held by any church
Except for the one I am part of
Different denominations is not an argument against sola scripture as it’s traditionally understood because most denominations after classical Protestantism that came out either believed in genuine heresy (mornonism) or where caused by politics rather then religious differences and the denominations just never saw a reason to combine each other because they already believe the other denomination is saved considering they adhere to the nicene creed
And what about the Catholics or the Eastern Orthodox or the Oriental Orthodox? Those also read the Bible and claim to uphold what is written. So who's to trust? It's almost like you need an authority to read the Bible because it can be misinterpreted or something, if only the apostles left us with a Church to preserve its genuine meaning or something. Oh well, I guess they were too short sighted for that. Good thing that we got this rando in the 16th century to set the record straight with the criteria of "believe the Nicene creed (which every Christian does) but also don't be Catholic (even doe they also adhere to the Nicene creed)" Yeah, seems too shaky.

But you still failed to answer my questions. How come Scripture is the highest authority if it was compiled by the Church? And are denominational differences entirely inconsequential as to be dismissed so easily? And even if they are inconsequential, it stills concedes that Scripture can be misinterpreted and thus proves humans to be unreliable interpreters (Scripture is infallible but people aren't)
 
Correct

Except for the one I am part of

And what about the Catholics or the Eastern Orthodox or the Oriental Orthodox? Those also read the Bible and claim to uphold what is written. So who's to trust? It's almost like you need an authority to read the Bible because it can be misinterpreted or something, if only the apostles left us with a Church to preserve its genuine meaning or something. Oh well, I guess they were too short sighted for that. Good thing that we got this rando in the 16th century to set the record straight with the criteria of "believe the Nicene creed (which every Christian does) but also don't be Catholic (even doe they also adhere to the Nicene creed)" Yeah, seems too shaky.

But you still failed to answer my questions. How come Scripture is the highest authority if it was compiled by the Church? And are denominational differences entirely inconsequential as to be dismissed so easily? And even if they are inconsequential, it stills concedes that Scripture can be misinterpreted and thus proves humans to be unreliable interpreters (Scripture is infallible but people aren't)
>B-b-but if your words are true then I won't be able to follow muh heckin' epic Christian Identity movement anymore... what would Hitler think of me??
 
Back
Top