Are you in favor of race-based eugenics like liberals were before WW2?
I try to interpret eugenics with a modern lens, incorporating new findings in anthropology and the advent of genetics research. In my view modern hominids can be split into 3.5 groups.
1. Aboriginals and Polynesians or Out of Africa 1 (OOA1): This common ancestors of this group left about 200,000 years ago, with the migration out happening over a short period of time. They tend to have many more basal traits, and are highly interbred with early Denisovans, mixing far more than Altaic people would with them or even how much Indo-Europeans would with Neanderthals. There's even evidence OOA1 interbred with the last of homo-erectus. Historically the results of this can be seen, failing to outcompete really any group, and eventually being forced out of Asia, living on the fringes in modern Oceania. Technologically they never advanced very far, despite having much more time to settle than any other humans. Basically, they peaked with some simple astronomy. They never created writing, and many languages in this group don't even have a concept of time. Their brains tend to be the smallest of any modern group of hominids. This group is not an area of expertise for me, so I won't elaborate further here.
2. Altaic-Indo-European people or Out of Africa 2 (OOA2): This group includes all non-Africans and non-OOA1. The common ancestor of this group left Africa 60-70,000, and again this all happened in a short period of time. Furthermore, OOA2 can be split into three subgroups
A). Only neanderthal admixture
B). Mixed neanderthal and denisovan admixture
C). Only denisovan admixture
These early altaic-indo-europeans would easily outcompete and interbreed, eventually leading to the extinction of the neanderthals/denisovans. I believe that the genetic differences between these people tend to be overstated, and assertions pre WW2 eugenics made here have not aged well. Historically, all of these races within the Altaic-Indo-European group had built complex civilizations. Yes there are some differences but they are much more minor. The argument that normies make for blacks having insanely low iqs (MUH poverty MUH cultural differences), could actually be made in this case, because unlike blacks having IQ points that are literally 15-25 points below averages, races that perform poorly in the OOA2 group tend to only perform worse by like 5 points.
3. Stayed in Africa (Not including North Africa)
I don't really have to say much, they're really just a different species. Modern anthropological and genetic evidence supports basically all of eugenics claims about Africans. In terms of evolutionary differences, they had ample time to completely diverge. There's not much to be said that hasn't already been said here. I mean, they didn't even invent the wheel until it was shown to them. They've shown themselves largely incompatible with a complex society.
