Is Flat Earth as ridiculous as it sounds?

[nagolbud]

I thank you for the response, and I did watch a few of those videos you also attached to the thread earlier, too (the second one certainly being the most blatant to me now that I acknowledge its explanation), after comprehending your own thoughts about mine. I think you're right, there really wouldn't be a way, for example, that we could see all of the stars in the Earth's southern hemisphere if, well, that hemisphere was instead the underside of a disk that we would fall off of, which isn't the case since we do see different stars dependent on where we are. This is a truth that seems more obvious the more that I consider it from reasonings like that, so I'll take it as that, and I thank you for giving a rebuke to my neutrality on the topic. My prior thinking wasn't very proper.

They use stars for navigation because they rotate above a flat earth... if we were hurling through space the stars would be different every single night, and you would never be able to navigate the ocean let alone land by the stars if that were the case... just more proof the earth is not a sphere spinning and flying through space at retarded ass speeds...

TLDR: The stars are consistent and repeatable through seasons and time.. this would not happen on a globohomo model. Common sense, science, and Bible all contradict government schooling.. and prove a flat stationary earth.

braindead, brainwash, college, creativity, life, normies, propaganda, psyop, publicschool, retards, society, university

Embrace Your Inner Chudliness With Chud Chemes and Chud Art..

chudstar.com

Isn't it strange how literally the entire realm sees the same moon, stars, ect. Different sides of the globe would see different stars lol. Retard shit...

 

[nagolbud]

Meanwhile, me in Central America (pretty much) and I can literally see the moon 24/7 all day every day. Again, doesn't work on a globetard model..

Moon Visible All Day Every Day from Central America [Flat Earth]

Like + Comment + Share

odysee.com

Moon Visible 24/7 365 Days a Year in Central America [Flat Earth] Part 2

Like + Comment + Share

odysee.com

Tickling Your Cognitive Dissonance with the Flat Earth

https://nagolbud.com

odysee.com

Evidence of Water Above the Firmament [Flat Earth]

Like + Comment + Share

odysee.com

 

[baqqrih]

They use stars for navigation because they rotate above a flat earth... if we were hurling through space the stars would be different every single night, and you would never be able to navigate the ocean let alone land by the stars if that were the case... just more proof the earth is not a sphere spinning and flying through space at retarded ass speeds...

TLDR: The stars are consistent and repeatable through seasons and time.. this would not happen on a globohomo model. Common sense, science, and Bible all contradict government schooling.. and prove a flat stationary earth.

braindead, brainwash, college, creativity, life, normies, propaganda, psyop, publicschool, retards, society, university

Embrace Your Inner Chudliness With Chud Chemes and Chud Art..

chudstar.com

Isn't it strange how literally the entire realm sees the same moon, stars, ect. Different sides of the globe would see different stars lol. Retard shit...

But how come people on other parts of the Earth see different stars than we do on our part of the Earth each night if we're all on one immobile disk? I don't get it.

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

But how come people on other parts of the Earth see different stars than we do on our part of the Earth each night if we're all on one immobile disk? I don't get it.

Don't forget @nagolbud is a mod, xhe will give you a 50% warning if you keep asking these questions

 

[Cortex]

But how come people on other parts of the Earth see different stars than we do on our part of the Earth each night if we're all on one immobile disk? I don't get it.

AI projectors designed by Elon Musk to keep the sky rotating.

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

AI projectors designed by Elon Musk to keep the sky rotating.

Vintage Photos Spotlight Bizarre Nazi Concept Weapon

Vintage Photos Spotlight Bizarre Nazi Concept Weapon

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk

 

[nagolbud]

But how come people on other parts of the Earth see different stars than we do on our part of the Earth each night if we're all on one immobile disk? I don't get it.

Perspective... you can look at a cylinder and see a rectangle while I see a circle.
Perspective. The word of the day...

per·spec·tive
/pərˈspektiv/
noun
1.
the art of drawing solid objects on a two-dimensional surface so as to give the right impression of their height, width, depth, and position in relation to each other when viewed from a particular point.
"a perspective drawing"
2.
a particular attitude toward or way of regarding something; a point of view.
"most guidebook history is written from the editor's perspective"

 

[nagolbud]

The normies pretending to be chuds have gone silent. Their cog dis is short circuiting...

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

Perspective... you can look at a cylinder and see a rectangle while I see a circle.
Perspective. The word of the day...

per·spec·tive
/pərˈspektiv/
noun
1.
the art of drawing solid objects on a two-dimensional surface so as to give the right impression of their height, width, depth, and position in relation to each other when viewed from a particular point.
"a perspective drawing"
2.
a particular attitude toward or way of regarding something; a point of view.
"most guidebook history is written from the editor's perspective"

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

Perspective... you can look at a cylinder and see a rectangle while I see a circle.
Perspective. The word of the day...

per·spec·tive
/pərˈspektiv/
noun
1.
the art of drawing solid objects on a two-dimensional surface so as to give the right impression of their height, width, depth, and position in relation to each other when viewed from a particular point.
"a perspective drawing"
2.
a particular attitude toward or way of regarding something; a point of view.
"most guidebook history is written from the editor's perspective"

> uses Wikipedia definition as an argument

 

[nagolbud]

> uses Wikipedia definition as an argument

Webster. Even though that's a fair argument in other contexts. The Vatican bought the encyclopedia to remove many things back in the day... old ones literally have scientific proof of a firmament and other such things removed, such as the Geneva Bible and things pertaining to the reformation.

Most don't know the Geneva Bible was the first English Bible and the translators called the Vatican the whore of Babylon in their notes.

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

Webster. Even though that's a fair argument in other contexts. The Vatican bought the encyclopedia to remove many things back in the day... old ones literally have scientific proof of a firmament and other such things removed, such as the Geneva Bible and things pertaining to the reformation.

Most don't know the Geneva Bible was the first English Bible and the translators called the Vatican the whore of Babylon in their notes.

I don't care if the earth flat or round either

Pointless psyop

 

[nagolbud]

I don't care if the earth flat or round either

Pointless psyop

cope and seethe normie. go watch some netflix.

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

cope and seethe normie. go watch some netflix.
View attachment 1569

 

[baqqrih]

Perspective... you can look at a cylinder and see a rectangle while I see a circle.
Perspective. The word of the day...

per·spec·tive
/pərˈspektiv/
noun
1.
the art of drawing solid objects on a two-dimensional surface so as to give the right impression of their height, width, depth, and position in relation to each other when viewed from a particular point.
"a perspective drawing"
2.
a particular attitude toward or way of regarding something; a point of view.
"most guidebook history is written from the editor's perspective"

Yeah, but what causes that perspective? I'm still not getting it, man. I need an explanation. For an example, me and you are on a disk, right, as the Earth is, yes? If I'm on one side of the disk, say, I'm in Chile, and you're on the other side of the disk, at the other end of it, somewhere like Mongolia, are we both going to see the North Star in the sky?

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

Flatearth.life

 

[nagolbud]

Yeah, but what causes that perspective? I'm still not getting it, man. I need an explanation. For an example, me and you are on a disk, right, as the Earth is, yes? If I'm on one side of the disk, say, I'm in Chile, and you're on the other side of the disk, at the other end of it, somewhere like Mongolia, are we both going to see the North Star in the sky?

Where you are standing...
If you stand at the north and see an ojbect from the south, and i stand and see the same object looking north from the south...

yet we can still both navigate based on what we see....
#common sense says what?

 

[nagolbud]

Flatearth.life

You dont start off as a flat earther, ill tell ya that. I went to the same public schools, my mom was a cuntopher teaching at them too.

 

[nagolbud]

View attachment 1571

Your life is your life.

 

[baqqrih]

Where you are standing...
If you stand at the north and see an ojbect from the south, and i stand and see the same object looking north from the south...

yet we can still both navigate based on what we see....
#common sense says what?

What? So, is that a yes? I would be able to see the North Star from a place like Chile?

 

[nagolbud]

What? So, is that a yes? I would be able to see the North Star from a place like Chile?

Nigga i can see the moon 24/7 every single fuckin' day. Watch my videos. I literally record it.

 

[baqqrih]

Nigga i can see the moon 24/7 every single fuckin' day. Watch my videos. I literally record it.

Well, on the topic of the moon, I still am confused with that as well, because when we look at the moon on two different sides of our Earth, we can also notice that it'll flip over in appearance on one side compared to if we looked at it at the same time on the opposite side of the Earth (if we describe it by the Flat Earth model, if I went to the furthest bit of land on one side of the disk, and you went to a furthest bit on another, like, as I brought up earlier, somewhere like Chile compared to a place in East Asia like Korea or Mongolia, in reality, ignoring either model, what is true is that we would see the flipped image of the moon), which I think adds to the idea that we live on a ball-like structure. I’ve attached photographic imagery to display this concept, and drawn two models comparing the conclusion of a sphere shape from the different perspectives in contrast to the impossibility of this real phenomenon not occurring through the flat shape, in hopes that I can display this theory to you. I am not educated on astronomy, so I still do not know how your study would have allowed you to constantly view the moon throughout the day (a time-lapse video tracking the moon throughout the day and night, thus truly “24/7”, would certainly help me to understand your theory besides the short videos you attached of the moon simply being present at day, but with nothing further than those times of day), but I hope these models that I’ve drawn allow you to understand my thinking.

 

[Spas]

Well, on the topic of the moon, I still am confused with that as well, because when we look at the moon on two different sides of our Earth, we can also notice that it'll flip over in appearance on one side compared to if we looked at it at the same time on the opposite side of the Earth (if we describe it by the Flat Earth model, if I went to the furthest bit of land on one side of the disk, and you went to a furthest bit on another, like, as I brought up earlier, somewhere like Chile compared to a place in East Asia like Korea or Mongolia, in reality, ignoring either model, what is true is that we would see the flipped image of the moon), which I think adds to the idea that we live on a ball-like structure. I’ve attached photographic imagery to display this concept, and drawn two models comparing the conclusion of a sphere shape from the different perspectives in contrast to the impossibility of this real phenomenon not occurring through the flat shape, in hopes that I can display this theory to you. I am not educated on astronomy, so I still do not know how your study would have allowed you to constantly view the moon throughout the day (a time-lapse video tracking the moon throughout the day and night, thus truly “24/7”, would certainly help me to understand your theory besides the short videos you attached of the moon simply being present at day, but with nothing further than those times of day), but I hope these models that I’ve drawn allow you to understand my thinking.
View attachment 1576
View attachment 1577
View attachment 1578

>got his moon images from nasa approved jewgle results
It's so easy to deceive the goyim

 

[nagolbud]

>got his moon images from nasa approved jewgle results
It's so easy to deceive the goyim

literally my video...

 

[nagolbud]

Well, on the topic of the moon, I still am confused with that as well, because when we look at the moon on two different sides of our Earth, we can also notice that it'll flip over in appearance on one side compared to if we looked at it at the same time on the opposite side of the Earth (if we describe it by the Flat Earth model, if I went to the furthest bit of land on one side of the disk, and you went to a furthest bit on another, like, as I brought up earlier, somewhere like Chile compared to a place in East Asia like Korea or Mongolia, in reality, ignoring either model, what is true is that we would see the flipped image of the moon), which I think adds to the idea that we live on a ball-like structure. I’ve attached photographic imagery to display this concept, and drawn two models comparing the conclusion of a sphere shape from the different perspectives in contrast to the impossibility of this real phenomenon not occurring through the flat shape, in hopes that I can display this theory to you. I am not educated on astronomy, so I still do not know how your study would have allowed you to constantly view the moon throughout the day (a time-lapse video tracking the moon throughout the day and night, thus truly “24/7”, would certainly help me to understand your theory besides the short videos you attached of the moon simply being present at day, but with nothing further than those times of day), but I hope these models that I’ve drawn allow you to understand my thinking.
View attachment 1576
View attachment 1577
View attachment 1578

bro make a paragraph o algo...