Kill yourself you disgusting protcuck.
Keep worshipping dead single mothers and confessing your bbc porn addiction to pedophiles in a lgbt church and gay popeKill yourself you disgusting protcuck.
Whats up with them?Orthobros
Kill yourself you disgusting protcuck.
I think we should settle down, here. Calling someone a "protcuck", or calling someone a degenerated porn addict, or, for that matter, referring to the mother of Christ as nothing more than a "dead single mother", all will not get us anywhere in understanding one another's beliefs beyond our previous perceptions. I observed this same behavior in the pictured discussion with the Roman Catholic, where, after the Catholic man provided his scriptural argument, he was simply called a "delusional retard", and the conversation tumbled down from there. Rampant insults like these are as valuable as something to wipe the rear with. Attaining an actual understanding of a person you perceive as a heretic, however, is certainly valuable through the essence of wisdom, even as it may be difficult to confront those opposing words that come with that pursuit, but what has difficulty ever done to stop a wise man (of whom I'd imagine both Diglet and Aquinas are)?Keep worshipping dead single mothers and confessing your bbc porn addiction to pedophiles in a lgbt church and gay pope
They tolerate interracial-relationships more than Catholics by a long shot.Whats up with them?
No way you think protestants are the least cucked Christians. Have you seen the Anglican church recently?Catholics are the biggest cucks in Christian lore right next to Orthobros.
You think this is better than what Protestants do?No way you think protestants are the least cucked Christians. Have you seen the Anglican church recently?
dnr I provided the evidence to rebuke themI think we should settle down, here. Calling someone a "protcuck", or calling someone a degenerated porn addict, or, for that matter, referring to the mother of Christ as nothing more than a "dead single mother", all will not get us anywhere in understanding one another's beliefs beyond our previous perceptions. I observed this same behavior in the pictured discussion with the Roman Catholic, where, after the Catholic man provided his scriptural argument, he was simply called a "delusional retard", and the conversation tumbled down from there. Rampant insults like these are as valuable as something to wipe the rear with. Attaining an actual understanding of a person you perceive as a heretic, however, is certainly valuable through the essence of wisdom, even as it may be difficult to confront those opposing words that come with that pursuit, but what has difficulty ever done to stop a wise man (of whom I'd imagine both Diglet and Aquinas are)?
Who gives a shit about protestants? How is that relevant to anythingNo way you think protestants
I'd say it's relevant because Protestants are the primary force in opposition to Roman Catholicism.Who gives a shit about protestants? How is that relevant to anything
And thats bad because?I'd say it's relevant because Protestants are the primary force in opposition to Roman Catholicism.
I never implied that it's a bad thing, I don't like Roman Catholicism either.And thats bad because?
You're not a protestant? I assumed that's why you were arguing against Catholics.Who gives a shit about protestants? How is that relevant to anything
Stop making up lies to justify your hatred.They tolerate interracial-relationships more than Catholics by a long shot.
I won’t derail the thread into pointless shit-flinging. Do your own research then get back to me.Stop making up lies to justify your hatred.
God made Adam and EveI won’t derail the thread into pointless shit-flinging. Do your own research then get back to me.
Welcome to the world of religious debates.It feels like I've seen this exact same thread a million times already, in various forums at that.
Welcome to the world of religious debates.