Conspiracy How can one here deny Christ

Mohammed was just one example. There are hundreds of religious texts/religions out there.
Study them yourself and you quickly realize all religion is a faggot show of lies and deceit.

We didn’t eat the apple and do the original sin either, yet we get punished for it anyway.
You would have. You suck golf balls threw garden hoses now, you'd have eaten the forbidden fruit back in the garden as well... your own flesh is wicked asf, everyones is. On the day of judgement we are cloaked in the righteousness of Jesus Christ, not our own works.

Jesus Christ was the only one that has ever come and taught that salvation is through faith alone, ALL religions teach its based on works, money, status, ect.
 
t.

Coexist T-Shirt | RedMolotov
Hinduism and Buddhism believe in semen rivers, worship cows and believe in retarded shit like your diet should be foods which are over 70% water.

Paganism is worshiping shapes and trees

Islam fucks goats and children and satanism is gay
 
I’m the only non-religious person on the site albeit.
I doubt that. I personally think religious discussions are pointless because they’re all based on personal experiences that are impossible to talk about with non-believers. Then we get an endless shitflinging thread and I’m just like, I want to talk about cool things like demons and cryptids.
 
Hinduism and Buddhism believe in semen rivers, worship cows and believe in retarded shit like your diet should be foods which are over 70% water.

Paganism is worshiping shapes and trees

Islam fucks goats and children and satanism is gay
Unlike the other two Oriental faiths that you've mentioned (the Hindus and the Buddhists), Taoism is actually quite neat when it comes to philosophical ideas, but it, of course, also doesn't hold the entire truth of the world unlike what we find from Christ. From my personal observations, Lao Tzu's teachings form the highest level of wisdom that man can know through intuition (as in, thought without the revelation of the Christ). They're very interesting to read through.
 
We didn’t eat the apple and do the original sin either, yet we get punished for it anyway.
Well, to offer some insight on this from the Orthodox perspective, what we believe in is not original sin but rather "ancestral sin". Original sin asserts that everyone is guilty and born a sinner due to Adam and Eve committing that one act of sin. Western Christianity understands this matter in a very false way which is what leads to this admittedly valid complaint of yours. To put it simply, ancestral sin asserts that Adam introduced the disease of sin into humanity but we do not carry the guilt of what he did, we bear the consequences but not the guilt. Adam and Eve are guilty of their own sin, and your punishment will not be due to what they did, but rather what you did in this life. So while no one is born a sinner, it is more or less guaranteed that no man lives and stays free of sin. That's just the way of the world.

So, no, in my opinion our punishment in particular is not due to that apple. It is men who wage wars after all, God merely allows it to happen.
 
Well, to offer some insight on this from the Orthodox perspective, what we believe in is not original sin but rather "ancestral sin". Original sin asserts that everyone is guilty and born a sinner due to Adam and Eve committing that one act of sin. Western Christianity understands this matter in a very false way which is what leads to this admittedly valid complaint of yours. To put it simply, ancestral sin asserts that Adam introduced the disease of sin into humanity but we do not carry the guilt of what he did, we bear the consequences but not the guilt. Adam and Eve are guilty of their own sin, and your punishment will not be due to what they did, but rather what you did in this life. So while no one is born a sinner, it is more or less guaranteed that no man lives and stays free of sin. That's just the way of the world.

So, no, in my opinion our punishment in particular is not due to that apple. It is men who wage wars after all, God merely allows it to happen.
Bible > Orthodox man made "wisdom"
 
Did Jesus ever joke and use humour?
In the Book of Numbers, He (as the Angel of The Lord) did once speak through a donkey in order to ultimately sway a sorcerous diviner away from the duty that a non-Israelitic king had given him, of cursing Israel, with God commanding this foreign prophet to instead bless the land. Perhaps the encounter was more fearsome to the man actually facing God Himself through the moving mouth of his pet donkey, but the particular idea of a talking donkey, away from that context, does sound quite funny to me.
>Then the Angel of The Lord went ahead and stood in a narrow place, where there was no way to turn either to the right or to the left. When the donkey saw the Angel of The Lord, she lay down under Balaam. And Balaam’s anger was kindled, and he struck the donkey with his staff. Then The Lord opened the mouth of the donkey, and she said to Balaam, “What have I done to you, that you have struck me these three times?” And Balaam said to the donkey, “Because you have made a fool of me. I wish I had a sword in my hand, for then I would kill you.” And the donkey said to Balaam, “Am I not your donkey, on which you have ridden all your life long to this day? Is it my habit to treat you this way?” And he said, “No.” - Numbers 22:26-30
 
In the Book of Numbers, He (as the Angel of The Lord) did once speak through a donkey in order to ultimately sway a sorcerous diviner away from the duty that a non-Israelitic king had given him, of cursing Israel, with God commanding this foreign prophet to instead bless the land. Perhaps the encounter was more fearsome to the man actually facing God Himself through the moving mouth of his pet donkey, but the particular idea of a talking donkey, away from that context, does sound quite funny to me.
>Then the Angel of The Lord went ahead and stood in a narrow place, where there was no way to turn either to the right or to the left. When the donkey saw the Angel of The Lord, she lay down under Balaam. And Balaam’s anger was kindled, and he struck the donkey with his staff. Then The Lord opened the mouth of the donkey, and she said to Balaam, “What have I done to you, that you have struck me these three times?” And Balaam said to the donkey, “Because you have made a fool of me. I wish I had a sword in my hand, for then I would kill you.” And the donkey said to Balaam, “Am I not your donkey, on which you have ridden all your life long to this day? Is it my habit to treat you this way?” And he said, “No.” - Numbers 22:26-30
thats not humour
 
Well, to offer some insight on this from the Orthodox perspective, what we believe in is not original sin but rather "ancestral sin". Original sin asserts that everyone is guilty and born a sinner due to Adam and Eve committing that one act of sin. Western Christianity understands this matter in a very false way which is what leads to this admittedly valid complaint of yours. To put it simply, ancestral sin asserts that Adam introduced the disease of sin into humanity but we do not carry the guilt of what he did, we bear the consequences but not the guilt. Adam and Eve are guilty of their own sin, and your punishment will not be due to what they did, but rather what you did in this life. So while no one is born a sinner, it is more or less guaranteed that no man lives and stays free of sin. That's just the way of the world.

So, no, in my opinion our punishment in particular is not due to that apple. It is men who wage wars after all, God merely allows it to happen.
That makes more sense. It’s hard to believe how ass Western Christianity is. I blame the boomers.
In the Book of Numbers, He (as the Angel of The Lord) did once speak through a donkey in order to ultimately sway a sorcerous diviner away from the duty that a non-Israelitic king had given him, of cursing Israel, with God commanding this foreign prophet to instead bless the land. Perhaps the encounter was more fearsome to the man actually facing God Himself through the moving mouth of his pet donkey, but the particular idea of a talking donkey, away from that context, does sound quite funny to me.
>Then the Angel of The Lord went ahead and stood in a narrow place, where there was no way to turn either to the right or to the left. When the donkey saw the Angel of The Lord, she lay down under Balaam. And Balaam’s anger was kindled, and he struck the donkey with his staff. Then The Lord opened the mouth of the donkey, and she said to Balaam, “What have I done to you, that you have struck me these three times?” And Balaam said to the donkey, “Because you have made a fool of me. I wish I had a sword in my hand, for then I would kill you.” And the donkey said to Balaam, “Am I not your donkey, on which you have ridden all your life long to this day? Is it my habit to treat you this way?” And he said, “No.” - Numbers 22:26-30
There was a bear sent by God that ate some kids after they made fun of Elisha’s bald head.
 
Taoism is actually quite neat when it comes to philosophical ideas, but it, of course, also doesn't hold the entire truth of the world unlike what we find from Christ. From my personal observations, Lao Tzu's teachings form the highest level of wisdom that man can know through intuition (as in, thought without the revelation of the Christ). They're very interesting to read through.
Elaborate.
 
Back
Top