Politics Community Parenting And Other Family Structures

Soyteen Liker

Soyteen Liker

Active member
The nuclear family structure is 1 mom 1 dad and their kids. You've heard of that. However, there is also community parenting which is how children were raised in prehistoric days. The basic idea is that you have a woman give birth to a child and every trusted adult in the community raises it. I think this is much better for various reasons:

1. Generational trauma would be much more difficult to achieve. In modern western society, children are stuck with their parents until they're 18 or older, these parents can basically abuse their child emotionally and they can't go anywhere, leading to trauma and them raising their children with the same cycle. In community parenting, they could hang out in a different home if their parents hate them for whatever reason.

2. More role models. If you're using this forum, chances are that you know how single mothers tend to fuck up their sons and their masculinity. With community parenting, children will naturally gravitate towards strong father figures for boys and strong mother figures for girls, and thus a positive gender role cycle is formed that is lacking today.

3. The choice to raise a child becomes less of an all-or-nothing ordeal. This means that people won't be overwhelmed with regret in either direction because they aren't stuck with no kids or kids they don't want. What do you guys think?
 
That is true. In the early stages of human society, when life was more primitive, the whole tribe acted as your "family." This shifted in Europe during the 1500s due to the Catholic Church's influence; their goal was to dismantle clans and limit inbreeding. This led to increasing reliance on the community and enhancing the church's authority over people. Plus, a community-based approach to raising children might help address overpopulation issues.

I honestly can’t say there are much negatives to it.
 
Wouldn’t the kids be left without that intimacy between parent and child? Extended families would be a bit better but I don’t see how they’d have time to devote enough time for every kid.
 
Harlequin said:
That is true. In the early stages of human society, when life was more primitive, the whole tribe acted as your "family." This shifted in Europe during the 1500s due to the Catholic Church's influence; their goal was to dismantle clans and limit inbreeding. This led to increasing reliance on the community and enhancing the church's authority over people. Plus, a community-based approach to raising children might help address overpopulation issues.

I honestly can’t say there are much negatives to it.
Click to expand...
what if every adult is a sore nigger?
 
Soyteen Liker said:
The nuclear family structure is 1 mom 1 dad and their kids. You've heard of that. However, there is also community parenting which is how children were raised in prehistoric days. The basic idea is that you have a woman give birth to a child and every trusted adult in the community raises it. I think this is much better for various reasons:

1. Generational trauma would be much more difficult to achieve. In modern western society, children are stuck with their parents until they're 18 or older, these parents can basically abuse their child emotionally and they can't go anywhere, leading to trauma and them raising their children with the same cycle. In community parenting, they could hang out in a different home if their parents hate them for whatever reason.

2. More role models. If you're using this forum, chances are that you know how single mothers tend to fuck up their sons and their masculinity. With community parenting, children will naturally gravitate towards strong father figures for boys and strong mother figures for girls, and thus a positive gender role cycle is formed that is lacking today.

3. The choice to raise a child becomes less of an all-or-nothing ordeal. This means that people won't be overwhelmed with regret in either direction because they aren't stuck with no kids or kids they don't want. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...
The Nuclear Family has been the norm in Northwestern Europe (particularly England) since the high middle ages, and has had a significant presence in the West since at least the Bronze Age. The primary mode of living in Bronze Age Europe is what today we would call the Authoritarian family structure, where the eldest male stays in the house of his father while the other men go out and basically start nuclear families in their own houses. This is talked about in W.E. Hearn's book The Aryan Household https://www.imperiumpress.org/shop/the-indo-european-household/ but you can also hear some of it in this post on Substack https://www.stoneageherbalist.com/p/why-are-you-so-weird

1. Trauma is heavily exaggerated in scope by libtard psychologists, it is like the nureligion's form of "sin". The reality of "generational trauma" is that people who traumatize their kids are very likely to have genes which cause that behavior, and those genes get passed on to their kids.

2. Community parenting maybe in theory would be like that but in reality it is extremely longhoused and just results in more authority pushed against kids. Think of actual real life versions of community parenting like public education. Kids should spend a lot of time with other kids but not other parents

3. This pressure only came about because, as I said in (1), these complicated ideas of "trauma" rose up which forced parents to walk on eggshells. And a lot of this was because psychologists believed that the reason Nazi Germany happened was because parents were too authoritarian on their children. The main focus of parenting should be ensuring your child develops the right explicitly learned behaviors, as the implicitly learned ones are usually more biological than people think. But it should also be ensuring that your child has a happy childhood because, as much as people like to deny it, being a kid is the best stage of life and not just because of not needing to work. I could link a nice Schopenhauer piece on childhood but it would get off topic
 
Harlequin said:
The Nuclear Family has been the norm in Northwestern Europe (particularly England) since the high middle ages, and has had a significant presence in the West since at least the Bronze Age. The primary mode of living in Bronze Age Europe is what today we would call the Authoritarian family structure, where the eldest male stays in the house of his father while the other men go out and basically start nuclear families in their own houses. This is talked about in W.E. Hearn's book The Aryan Household https://www.imperiumpress.org/shop/the-indo-european-household/ but you can also hear some of it in this post on Substack https://www.stoneageherbalist.com/p/why-are-you-so-weird

1. Trauma is heavily exaggerated in scope by libtard psychologists, it is like the nureligion's form of "sin". The reality of "generational trauma" is that people who traumatize their kids are very likely to have genes which cause that behavior, and those genes get passed on to their kids.

2. Community parenting maybe in theory would be like that but in reality it is extremely longhoused and just results in more authority pushed against kids. Think of actual real life versions of community parenting like public education. Kids should spend a lot of time with other kids but not other parents

3. This pressure only came about because, as I said in (1), these complicated ideas of "trauma" rose up which forced parents to walk on eggshells. And a lot of this was because psychologists believed that the reason Nazi Germany happened was because parents were too authoritarian on their children. The main focus of parenting should be ensuring your child develops the right explicitly learned behaviors, as the implicitly learned ones are usually more biological than people think. But it should also be ensuring that your child has a happy childhood because, as much as people like to deny it, being a kid is the best stage of life and not just because of not needing to work. I could link a nice Schopenhauer piece on childhood but it would get off topic
Click to expand...
trvthtsarbomba
kids should be tought basic ideals, not to engage in faggy shit and have confidence, not to be loud and tuff, and from there help them in life, they will grow a sense of labor and creativity, and will make a good time for everyone, but the kike didn't want people to prosper so they brushed that off and said "treat your child as a neo-slave and he'll figure out how to behave in society"
 
General Alek said:
this would be shitty

its a housewife's job to raise the offspring

she learns how to do it properly
Click to expand...
False. It's the women's job to raise them until about 5-6 and then it's the fathers duty to teach them how to be Chud Star.
It's a team effort. You incels have been taught lies and bullshit, it's a psyop to keep you in the cage of self black pilled depression.

The reason you are an incel is because your father didn't teach you how to be Chud Star. Luckily for you, I am banging your mom and will gladly be your step-dad and teach you the ways of the Chudarisee.
 
nagolbud said:
False. It's the women's job to raise them until about 5-6 and then it's the fathers duty to teach them how to be Chud Star.
It's a team effort. You incels have been taught lies and bullshit, it's a psyop to keep you in the cage of self black pilled depression.

The reason you are an incel is because your father didn't teach you how to be Chud Star. Luckily for you, I am banging your mom and will gladly be your step-dad and teach you the ways of the Chudarisee.
Click to expand...
its your first instinct to go to mom for stuff

I suppose fathers can take over when they hit puberty
 
Soyteen Liker said:
The nuclear family structure is 1 mom 1 dad and their kids. You've heard of that. However, there is also community parenting which is how children were raised in prehistoric days. The basic idea is that you have a woman give birth to a child and every trusted adult in the community raises it. I think this is much better for various reasons:

1. Generational trauma would be much more difficult to achieve. In modern western society, children are stuck with their parents until they're 18 or older, these parents can basically abuse their child emotionally and they can't go anywhere, leading to trauma and them raising their children with the same cycle. In community parenting, they could hang out in a different home if their parents hate them for whatever reason.

2. More role models. If you're using this forum, chances are that you know how single mothers tend to fuck up their sons and their masculinity. With community parenting, children will naturally gravitate towards strong father figures for boys and strong mother figures for girls, and thus a positive gender role cycle is formed that is lacking today.

3. The choice to raise a child becomes less of an all-or-nothing ordeal. This means that people won't be overwhelmed with regret in either direction because they aren't stuck with no kids or kids they don't want. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

in mexico community raises most kids. grandma and grandpa spend a lot of time with them at ages 3-9 and as they get older more time with dad.

i've had my fair share of raising these runts too... teaching them lessons when they stole my ducks or solar lights.

went and talked to their dads and they offered me money but i said nope, them boys comin to put in some work on the city farm. made them cut the entire streets grass with a machete. everyone driving by asked me why they were cutting the grass while i stood there, told them, so entire community proceeded to scold them for stealing lol.
 
Back
Top