panchito
best member of all the forum
bIg if trueStalin for a time is actually nagolbud taking revenge.
bIg if trueStalin for a time is actually nagolbud taking revenge.
hating the west is a side effect of being brownMost of them are atheists but they accept Muslims aswell. The irony is that these commies tend to oppose the USA and zogged governments in general. They're kind of on the right side for all the wrong reasons, I guess.
hitler did social reforms too and he didn't have to end up starving half the country and being such an asshole about itConsider Stalin as an example.
Completely disagree, I stated why I think this at the very beginning, While I did fail to mention, I felt it was implied that Moses Hess served as Marx's mentor. Hess introduced Marx, helped him join Rheinische Zeitung (a far left newspaper) in 1842 and introducing both Engles and Marx to Communism. Moses Hess had a definite impact on Marx's thinking, and He assisted him and Engles on the Communist Manifesto. All of the writers for the Communist Manifesto are Jewish, This by definition makes it a product of Jews, As for psyop I stated why near the end why it's perfect for destroying society and culture.Reducing communism to a Jewish psyop is historically inaccurate
I never stated this, I stated how it is more than anything a tool for Zionists to subvert society although I did mention they did have the same goal, that being domination over all nations.Karl Marx's philosophy was not about a religious or ethnic agenda. It was a critique of industrial capitalism.
Marx's was a college educated man who simply made bad life choices, You do raise a good point Karl Marx definitely did not receive financial support from his close relatives, shocking how they hoarded the wealth lol. When I stated "through blood and spirt" it was more so showing how the centralization of credit/wealth being towards a universal bank relates closely to the Rothschild mission of money without borders and control of the wider world. Wealthy judeo-banking dynasties very existence does support the very idea that there are Zionists seeking to control the world, through any means possible. In what I was writing I stated more than anything Communism is a tool for Zionists, a foolish ideology which seeks to enslave workers and not liberate them.Marx's personal life was one of poverty and struggle, hardly the hallmark of someone closely allied with banking dynasties.
I wouldn't consider it folly given how Hess perfectly outlines both a racial struggle and the systematic replacement of the native arabs in Palestine, and the return to the "Jewish Homeland" in his book. I see Theodor Herzl as a Columbus to Hess's Leif Erikson if that makes sense. But by all means was Hess a Zionist through and through.Equating Zionism with communism because of Hess is folly when you consider Zionism as a political movement didn't truly coalesce until decades after The Communist Manifesto was published
the end goal of it all being a cashless, classless society? I'd love to hear how you see the ideal communist utopia which communists such as yourself seek. The heavy taxation and taking of property is what I see as infringement on the individuals rights, and the promises of a utopia seem impossible. As for the last claim regarding ethnicity, I don't know why you mentioned that.The heavy taxation and property confiscation you mention were seen as means to an end, not ends in themselves. It had nothing to do with ethnicity.
Funny enough that quote is credited to Hess, and I do believe the Atheistic society which Communism seeks is to decay morality, Do you think morals are sprung from Human nature?As for Christianity, Marx's critique was of religion as an "opium of the people," not a specific attack on Christianity for Jewish gain.
Honestly there is just so much going on here with this, I'd love to hear how Joseph Stalin (another Jew) was a champion of Social reform, regardless of ethnicityYou paint a world where communism is a deliberate strategy to dismantle society for the benefit of one group. Yet, you ignore countless instances where communist movements have been about genuine attempts at social reform, regardless of their ethnicity. Consider Stalin as an example.
Rereading it I made a few spelling errors and probably should tweak the beginning with how I phrased itThis deserves to be pinned somewhere on the site. I can’t think of a more pro-satanic and parasitic system than Communism.
They oppose Israel albeit.hating the west is a side effect of being brown
israel makes part of the boogieman west (not the true west) they hate it because of its relations with america and enmity with the neighbouring arabic nationsThey oppose Israel albeit.
again it was more of a relation problem, the remaining communists that aren't any fond of the classical soviet style of the ideology are oftentimes more liberal or more leninistic/trotskyist or any other variations of the ideology that opposed stalin, most of them were jewish too and that branch of communism is often sponsored by modern amerigroyper universities and other such public organizations that pout money on brainwashing media like thatThe problem with labelling all communists as jew puppets is the fact that the soviet union was in conflict with Israel throughout the Cold War. It is true that communism as an ideology is of jewish origin (and I don't support it at all), but the soviet union in its late stages was very anti-jewish. Its collapse was also supported by the likes of George Soros as far as I'm aware. What then?
The true west has been dead since 1054, tbhisrael makes part of the boogieman west (not the true west)
wouldn't say the west died but a part of civilization didThe true west has been dead since 1054, tbh
All communist regimes inevitably lead to dictatorships. The common worker is unfit to maintain a well-functioning society.North Korea is a country ruled by the dynasty that has turned their government into a hereditary monarchy. This is not the dictatorship of the proletariat; this is a dictatorship over the proletariat.
Incredibly well worded, bravo!All communist regimes inevitably lead to dictatorships. The common worker is unfit to maintain a well-functioning society.
Hitler would've been a neat guy to have a conversation with.
out of all the high ranking nazis, he's probably the most interesting guy. No doubt the most controversial man to ever live would be neat to talk to. but if I could choose out of all men in history I'd probably want to speak to Augustus, I consider him one of the greatest men to ever liveHitler would've been a neat guy to have a conversation with.
They're the conglomerates, the bankers, and the industrialists. Trump is a part of the spectacle that keeps the masses entertained while the true power players continue to amass wealth and influence.what elite are we talking about
last time i saw trump was doing very well ans winning the elections
The fact that all contributors to the Communist Manifesto were Jewish does not make communism inherently Jewish.Completely disagree, I stated why I think this at the very beginning, While I did fail to mention, I felt it was implied that Moses Hess served as Marx's mentor. Hess introduced Marx, helped him join Rheinische Zeitung (a far left newspaper) in 1842 and introducing both Engles and Marx to Communism. Moses Hess had a definite impact on Marx's thinking, and He assisted him and Engles on the Communist Manifesto. All of the writers for the Communist Manifesto are Jewish, This by definition makes it a product of Jews, As for psyop I stated why near the end why it's perfect for destroying society and culture.
You're twisting your own words to fit a narrative. Claiming that communism is primarily a tool for Zionists to subvert society is essentially arguing that Marx's philosophy served an ethnic or religious agenda, which it did not.I never stated this, I stated how it is more than anything a tool for Zionists to subvert society although I did mention they did have the same goal, that being domination over all nations.
They were bourgeoisie, yes, but Marx chose his path, aligning with the proletariat, not living off his family's wealth.Marx's was a college educated man who simply made bad life choices, You do raise a good point Karl Marx definitely did not receive financial support from his close relatives, shocking how they hoarded the wealth lol. When I stated "through blood and spirt" it was more so showing how the centralization of credit/wealth being towards a universal bank relates closely to the Rothschild mission of money without borders and control of the wider world. Wealthy judeo-banking dynasties very existence does support the very idea that there are Zionists seeking to control the world, through any means possible. In what I was writing I stated more than anything Communism is a tool for Zionists, a foolish ideology which seeks to enslave workers and not liberate them.
We're talking about a world where you work not for a wage but because you want to contribute to society, where the fruits of labor are enjoyed by all, not just the few. I mentioned ethnicity because your argument often veers into suggesting that communism is some Jewish conspiracy.the end goal of it all being a cashless, classless society? I'd love to hear how you see the ideal communist utopia which communists such as yourself seek. The heavy taxation and taking of property is what I see as infringement on the individuals rights, and the promises of a utopia seem impossible. As for the last claim regarding ethnicity, I don't know why you mentioned that.
I believe human nature includes a capacity for empathy and cooperation, all of which can form the human spirit, without the need for divine commandments.Do you think morals are sprung from Human nature?
He expanded education, health services, and women's rights, all of which were quite notable feats from that time. And Stalin was not Jewish; he was Georgian.Honestly there is just so much going on here with this, I'd love to hear how Joseph Stalin (another Jew) was a champion of Social reform, regardless of ethnicity
No, it actually does mean exactly that.The fact that all contributors to the Communist Manifesto were Jewish does not make communism inherently Jewish.
The fact that all contributors to the Communist Manifesto were Jewish does not make communism inherently Jewish.
You're so close to the truth it hurts manThey're the conglomerates, the bankers, and the industrialists. Trump is a part of the spectacle that keeps the masses entertained while the true power players continue to amass wealth and influence.
so basically jewsThey're the conglomerates, the bankers, and the industrialists. Trump is a part of the spectacle that keeps the masses entertained while the true power players continue to amass wealth and influence.