Politics Christian Identity image dump thread
- Thread starter SiegeChud
- Start date
baqqrih
Well-known member
They are, yeah. What that image is trying to communicate, I think, is that they've descended so low into their spiritual degeneracy as to be dabbling in Judiac Kabbalah mysticism.
1Based Frog1
Well-known member
This right here is the truth (((they))) don't want Christians to know. Modern translations have twisted scripture to fit their globalist agenda, trying to make us all one big happy family when that's not what God intended.
Christ commands us to look after our own, our own race, our own children. Not dilute it with this multicultural BS. This is the real message, the one they try to bury under layers of politically correct drivel. And don't let them tell you otherwise. This doesn't mean we should be hateful; it means we need, we must have love for our own. It's about understanding the true intent of the Word, not the watered-down version they preach in churches today.
Christ commands us to look after our own, our own race, our own children. Not dilute it with this multicultural BS. This is the real message, the one they try to bury under layers of politically correct drivel. And don't let them tell you otherwise. This doesn't mean we should be hateful; it means we need, we must have love for our own. It's about understanding the true intent of the Word, not the watered-down version they preach in churches today.
baqqrih
Well-known member
This is all true. However, this is still not to say that the ideas of "Christian Identity" itself, in its own theology, are at-all permissible for us to adhere to, even if its emphasis on caring for our countrymen is a righteous message. Christian Identity is racialist in its nature and denies the existence of a spiritual race founded by the New Covenant of Christ that is transcendent and paramount over the worldly races of blood. Like Saint Paul says in his letter to the Galatians, there are Greeks and Jews both living separately by their blood who may become one people in the Christian faith, people of The Lord. Anglo-Israelism, meanwhile, instead conflates the ideas of the worldly race and the Christian race into a heretical fusion, of Aryans, by worldly blood, being the only ones promised Christ's gift of salvation. It maintains that Israelites are of a blood race and not of a spiritual race, in a foolishness no less simple-minded than the drivel of the rabbis, and so it should be treated with no less scorn than Judaism.
1Based Frog1
Well-known member
I get what you're saying. But Christian Identity is racialist because it recognizes the natural order God set forth. Saint Paul talks about Greeks and Jews becoming one in Christ, but that doesn't mean we should ignore the racial divisions God created. The world's races were divided at Babel for a reason, and when the time comes, God will unite us in His way, not through our misguided attempts to force it.
That is to say, I'm not fully on board with all aspects of Christian Identity.
Cortex
The Bee W Sea
Well, why did God make some races more violent than others?
SiegeChud
Well-known member
yes they are however many of the current niners in 2024 just kinda abandoned their own religion because its too hard for them to understand or something
Orks are supposed to be played as shock troopers
1. Being a Christian and also racist is not "christian identity". Christian Identity is when retarded kluxxers LARP as Israelites
2. Ethnocentric elements of the Old Testament cannot possibly be considered promotive of ethnocentrism in Christianity. The Israelites were chosen, the goyim (in a literal sense) are not. Believing in supercessionism means recognizing the Israelites as the general body of Christians across the world, and Israel as the Church. This doesn't sound very ethnic to me
3. Hitler and Mussolini would have agreed with the guys on the left. Francis Parker Yockey was a Theosophist as well, so I'm not sure why he's in your little picture of "based christians"
There are better arguments for Christians to make on this subject. Many saints and popes defended racialism and ethnic identity, usually from an Aristotelian point of view.
2. Ethnocentric elements of the Old Testament cannot possibly be considered promotive of ethnocentrism in Christianity. The Israelites were chosen, the goyim (in a literal sense) are not. Believing in supercessionism means recognizing the Israelites as the general body of Christians across the world, and Israel as the Church. This doesn't sound very ethnic to me
3. Hitler and Mussolini would have agreed with the guys on the left. Francis Parker Yockey was a Theosophist as well, so I'm not sure why he's in your little picture of "based christians"
There are better arguments for Christians to make on this subject. Many saints and popes defended racialism and ethnic identity, usually from an Aristotelian point of view.
Kabbalah is not satanism
SoytanEnthusiast
Well-known member
Why is the O9A picture there?
