Politics Christian Identity image dump thread
- Thread starter SiegeChud
- Start date
Weebhunter3000
mess with crash u get the bash, the moid, the wolf
I thought 09@ was a satanic group.
Me on the left.
Me on the left.
baqqrih
Well-known member
They are, yeah. What that image is trying to communicate, I think, is that they've descended so low into their spiritual degeneracy as to be dabbling in Judiac Kabbalah mysticism.
1Based Frog1
Well-known member
This right here is the truth (((they))) don't want Christians to know. Modern translations have twisted scripture to fit their globalist agenda, trying to make us all one big happy family when that's not what God intended.
Christ commands us to look after our own, our own race, our own children. Not dilute it with this multicultural BS. This is the real message, the one they try to bury under layers of politically correct drivel. And don't let them tell you otherwise. This doesn't mean we should be hateful; it means we need, we must have love for our own. It's about understanding the true intent of the Word, not the watered-down version they preach in churches today.
Christ commands us to look after our own, our own race, our own children. Not dilute it with this multicultural BS. This is the real message, the one they try to bury under layers of politically correct drivel. And don't let them tell you otherwise. This doesn't mean we should be hateful; it means we need, we must have love for our own. It's about understanding the true intent of the Word, not the watered-down version they preach in churches today.
baqqrih
Well-known member
This is all true. However, this is still not to say that the ideas of "Christian Identity" itself, in its own theology, are at-all permissible for us to adhere to, even if its emphasis on caring for our countrymen is a righteous message. Christian Identity is racialist in its nature and denies the existence of a spiritual race founded by the New Covenant of Christ that is transcendent and paramount over the worldly races of blood. Like Saint Paul says in his letter to the Galatians, there are Greeks and Jews both living separately by their blood who may become one people in the Christian faith, people of The Lord. Anglo-Israelism, meanwhile, instead conflates the ideas of the worldly race and the Christian race into a heretical fusion, of Aryans, by worldly blood, being the only ones promised Christ's gift of salvation. It maintains that Israelites are of a blood race and not of a spiritual race, in a foolishness no less simple-minded than the drivel of the rabbis, and so it should be treated with no less scorn than Judaism.
1Based Frog1
Well-known member
I get what you're saying. But Christian Identity is racialist because it recognizes the natural order God set forth. Saint Paul talks about Greeks and Jews becoming one in Christ, but that doesn't mean we should ignore the racial divisions God created. The world's races were divided at Babel for a reason, and when the time comes, God will unite us in His way, not through our misguided attempts to force it.
That is to say, I'm not fully on board with all aspects of Christian Identity.
Weebhunter3000
mess with crash u get the bash, the moid, the wolf
Well, why did God make some races more violent than others?
SiegeChud
Well-known member
yes they are however many of the current niners in 2024 just kinda abandoned their own religion because its too hard for them to understand or something
Orks are supposed to be played as shock troopers
1. Being a Christian and also racist is not "christian identity". Christian Identity is when retarded kluxxers LARP as Israelites
2. Ethnocentric elements of the Old Testament cannot possibly be considered promotive of ethnocentrism in Christianity. The Israelites were chosen, the goyim (in a literal sense) are not. Believing in supercessionism means recognizing the Israelites as the general body of Christians across the world, and Israel as the Church. This doesn't sound very ethnic to me
3. Hitler and Mussolini would have agreed with the guys on the left. Francis Parker Yockey was a Theosophist as well, so I'm not sure why he's in your little picture of "based christians"
There are better arguments for Christians to make on this subject. Many saints and popes defended racialism and ethnic identity, usually from an Aristotelian point of view.
2. Ethnocentric elements of the Old Testament cannot possibly be considered promotive of ethnocentrism in Christianity. The Israelites were chosen, the goyim (in a literal sense) are not. Believing in supercessionism means recognizing the Israelites as the general body of Christians across the world, and Israel as the Church. This doesn't sound very ethnic to me
3. Hitler and Mussolini would have agreed with the guys on the left. Francis Parker Yockey was a Theosophist as well, so I'm not sure why he's in your little picture of "based christians"
There are better arguments for Christians to make on this subject. Many saints and popes defended racialism and ethnic identity, usually from an Aristotelian point of view.
Kabbalah is not satanism
SoytanEnthusiast
Well-known member
Why is the O9A picture there?
panchito
surf it
they're based christians though
i don't think they would have "just" agreed with a random amerikaner schizo, and they greatly funded christian movements in their respective countries
Funding Christian movements is not an indicator of being a Christian personally. Christians became allies for the time being
Meliton Manzanas
I used the sharty before it was cool
So, Christianity is practically just an out-dated form of Judaism meant for the Goyim. Literally.
Meliton Manzanas
I used the sharty before it was cool
Christianity in the way you put it sounds very Jewy to me
baqqrih
Well-known member
Is it because you saw the words "Israel" and "Israelites?"
Meliton Manzanas
I used the sharty before it was cool
No, The way in which Lism put it as in “The Christians we’re the Jews and everyone else was the goyim”. Please elaborate and explain to me what you mean and to explain and argue on how it’s not. Gimme your point.
THE TRUE DIGLET
nevER selling
baqqrih
Well-known member
I mean, yes, the supersessionist belief is that Christians are the new Israelites, and that the Christian church now spiritually possesses the status of Israel, but I don't understand how those statuses make the Christian faith some construct of the Pharisees. This idea of a supersession in and of itself is denying the Jewish belief of an ethnic "chosen people" by extending it to a metaphysical chosenness of spiritual belief in Lord Christ as the God-Messiah.
Meliton Manzanas
I used the sharty before it was cool
So Christians are now the Jews and are now what God intended for the Jews and are now the promise and covenant of Israel?
baqqrih
Well-known member
Yes. Albeit, I wouldn't use the term "Jews" since that'd refer to those who deny this and still believe that the Old Covenant promises them this Israelitic status by their blood.
Meliton Manzanas
I used the sharty before it was cool
So, Christians are practically Jews in every way just not by ethnicity but by practice. Or are Christians subservient and believing in what Jews have to say?
baqqrih
Well-known member
Neither. As I said, to use the term "Jews" here would imply that we follow such laws as one would read about in the Books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy, for example. We believe that we are "Israelites," meaning that we now have this status of being chosen by God for His blessings, including that of salvation. This still wouldn't mean we practice "Jewish law" like how you might think of it with the Sabbath that Jews today follow, as this is what is practiced by people who still follow the now-defunct Old Covenant. This also wouldn't mean that we are subservient to Jews by any means, since they are not "chosen" anymore by this belief.
Meliton Manzanas
I used the sharty before it was cool
But aren’t you still the body of Israel higher to all Goyim
baqqrih
Well-known member
Well, if we did want to use the term "goyim" in this context, then non-believers, including Jews (as in, "shalom, how about some matzah" Jews), are the "goyim." Simply put, it's a spiritual difference of belief. If they are Christian, they are "Israelitic." I do not know an equally-contrasting term to refer to the "goyim" or "gentiles" when speaking in this context, but, basically, all non-Christians would be thought of as "goyim" if that helps you understand it (albeit they aren't actually called that).
