New posts
chuds.life
This is a male-only forum created to discuss politically incorrect content and archive information deleted from the mainstream internet. You can post with or without an account. Please read our rules before posting.

Serious THE PLAN OF JEWISH SUPREMACIST ENSLAVEMENT OF GOYIM

@nagolbud
Cope
I'm a SEA male and i hate Jews and not aligned myself with any stormfront movement

The Golobohomo world is committing asians fertlity extremination through weaponizing studymaxxing, carrermaxxing, hustlemaxxing way of life as a way to make average asians becoming reclused and detached from the bitter realities behind it all.
 
ULTRAVISIONARYBLACKPILISM said:
@nagolbud
Cope
I'm a SEA male and i hate Jews and not aligned myself with any stormfront movement

The Golobohomo world is committing asians fertlity extremination through weaponizing studymaxxing, carrermaxxing, hustlemaxxing way of life as a way to make average asians becoming reclused and detached from the bitter realities behind it all.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you need some new hobbies bro. Why you so worried about global psyops and faggotry? Paint a picture, write a poem, make a wood statue, do something new. Stop being a gaypill. Become, nagolpill.
 
ULTRAVISIONARYBLACKPILISM said:
@nagolbud

You no longer have any arguments left and resort to personal attack
Click to expand...

Nah bro I'm trying to spare you from the Hitler larp. Hitler had a vagina. His wife was a dude. He's a psyop. He fooled the world after being hired by the Vatican. Grow up my guy...

The Reichskonkordat is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 July 1933 by Cardinal Secretary of State.

“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before 1933, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book . . . was written by the Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.”

“Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did Lenin too, as far as I recall. The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the [Roman] Catholic Church. There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the [Nazi] Party.” – Adolph Hitler “Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”, (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).

“Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the ‘cause of the world’s problems’, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover, using them [i.e., the Rothschilds] in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front.” – William Sutton

Adolf-Hitler-with-Tranny-Girlfriend-1-1024x538.jpg


Hitler’s Wife and Family Were Androgynes #Transvestigation​


 
@nagolbud

I dont care about Hitler and his views

There are two pribabilities:

1. Jewish Domination Theory

2. Direct Extraterestrial Reptilian Henceman Domantion theory (Derived from gnosticism)

I'm still gathering the second one before unleashing it on here

Ask me before labelling me in the same boat like those SF

Also i will never believe your one side claim
 
ULTRAVISIONARYBLACKPILISM said:
@nagolbud

I dont care about Hitler and his views

There are two pribabilities:

1. Jewish Domination Theory

2. Direct Extraterestrial Reptilian Henceman Domantion theory (Derived from gnosticism)

I'm still gathering the second one before unleashing it on here

Ask me before labelling in the same boat like those SF
Click to expand...

Neither. You're just a fuckin bot. [Cognitive Dissonance Activated]
 
nagolbud said:
Nah bro I'm trying to spare you from the Hitler larp. Hitler had a vagina. His wife was a dude. He's a psyop. He fooled the world after being hired by the Vatican. Grow up my guy...

The Reichskonkordat is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 July 1933 by Cardinal Secretary of State.

“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before 1933, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book . . . was written by the Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.”

“Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did Lenin too, as far as I recall. The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the [Roman] Catholic Church. There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the [Nazi] Party.” – Adolph Hitler “Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”, (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).

“Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the ‘cause of the world’s problems’, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover, using them [i.e., the Rothschilds] in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front.” – William Sutton

Adolf-Hitler-with-Tranny-Girlfriend-1-1024x538.jpg


Hitler’s Wife and Family Were Androgynes #Transvestigation​


Click to expand...

Stop shitting up threads with copypastas unless you want your stuff to be moved to a "Hitler Rage Megathread", mmkay cuck?
Screenshot_20230929_105049.jpg
 
nagolbud said:
Nah bro I'm trying to spare you from the Hitler larp. Hitler had a vagina. His wife was a dude. He's a psyop. He fooled the world after being hired by the Vatican. Grow up my guy...

The Reichskonkordat is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 July 1933 by Cardinal Secretary of State.

“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before 1933, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book . . . was written by the Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.”

“Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did Lenin too, as far as I recall. The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the [Roman] Catholic Church. There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the [Nazi] Party.” – Adolph Hitler “Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”, (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).

“Why would the Jesuits use their implacable enemy, the Jews, to further their designs for world dominion? The Jesuits never do anything out in the open where they can be exposed. If they are recognized as the culprits, they will be blamed and suffer the consequences, but if they can use someone else as the ‘cause of the world’s problems’, especially an enemy they can destroy in the process, then they have simultaneously accomplished two of their objectives. The Jewish people are the perfect scapegoat. Since the Rothschilds are Jesuit agents operating under a Jewish cover, using them [i.e., the Rothschilds] in forming the Illuminati back in 1776 effectively throws the onus of this conspiracy on the Jews. The Rothschilds are certainly not the only Jesuit agents that operate under a Jewish front.” – William Sutton

Adolf-Hitler-with-Tranny-Girlfriend-1-1024x538.jpg


Hitler’s Wife and Family Were Androgynes #Transvestigation​


Click to expand...

Didn't karenin link you an article showing that the work this quote is from is basically a complete fabrication? Also, what do you think about the jews in that video?
 
Last edited:
DeepEcoCel said:
Didn't karenin link you an article showing that the work this quote is from is basically a complete fabrication?
Click to expand...
Raunschning lied about having personal conversations with Hitler, so every quotation attributed to Hitler in his book "Hitler m’a dit" (first published in France in 1939, translated into English and published as "Hitler Speaks" in the UK and "The Voice of Destruction" in the US) is fake and was never spoken by Hitler. However, the sentiments expressed by the Hitler character in "Hitler m'a dit" are broadly consistent with National Socialist ideology, as Raunschning used contemporary reports and his interactions with other NSDAP members as the basis for those imaginary talks by Hitler. Hitler and the NSDAP leadership opposed Vatican officials meddling in German politics via German clergy intermediaries and many top Nazis (notably Goebbels, Himmler, and Martin Bormann) were personally anti-Christian as well. At the same time, Hitler and Himmler did recognise the efficacy of the Catholic Church's organizational methods, including those of the Order of Jesus, and incorporated similar elements into the movement if they judged them useful.

We can see from the many sections discussing Catholicism, Protestantism and religious matters in "Mein Kampf" that Hitler was wise to papist priest subversion as early as 1923, at the same time, he was fully cognizant of inherent Germanic weaknesses that made Germans ineffective in resisting such subversion. In light of this, the Reichskonkordat can be seen as his attempt to neuter the most pernicious aspects of papist influence within Germany and resolve the Ultramontane problem that had been a thorn in the side of German governments since Bismarck, who had attempted to halt Ultramontanism in 1871 with the failed policy of Kulturkampf.
CHAPTER 3: GENERAL POLITICAL
REFLECTIONS FROM MY TIME IN VIENNA

Given that the right of royal succession gave a certain influence to the Archduke Franz Ferdinand, a policy of increasing the power of the Czechs was systematically enacted throughout the administration. With all the means at his disposal, the heir to the Dual Monarchy personally furthered a policy aimed at eliminating the influence of the Germans–or at least he defended that policy. Purely German districts were gradually but decisively brought within the danger zone of the mixed languages. Even in Lower Austria, this process began to make increasingly rapid progress, and Vienna was looked upon by the Czechs as their largest city.

The central idea of this new Habsburg was to establish a Slavic State in Central Europe. The Czech language was favored. (The Archduke's wife had formerly been a Czech countess, and she was wedded to the prince by an arranged marriage. She came from an environment of traditional hostility to the Germans.) This new state was to be constructed on a purely Catholic basis, so as to serve as a bulwark against Orthodox Russia. As had happened often in Habsburg history, religion was thus exploited to serve a purely political policy–and in this case, a fatal policy, at least for the Germans.

The result was lamentable in many respects.

Neither the House of Habsburg nor the Catholic Church received the reward that they expected.

Habsburg lost the throne, and the Church lost a great state.

By employing religious motives in the service of politics, a spirit was aroused that the instigators had never thought possible.

The attempt to root out Germandom in the old monarchy led to the emergence of the Pan-German Movement in Austria.
Click to expand...
CHAPTER 3: GENERAL POLITICAL
REFLECTIONS FROM MY TIME IN VIENNA
There was a third mistake [of the Pan-German Movement], one that also had its roots in the failure to understand the value of the masses. The masses are first set in motion, in a definite direction, by men of superior talents.
But once in motion, they are like a flywheel; they sustain the momentum and steady balance of the offensive.

The policy of the pan-German leaders in deciding to carry through a hard struggle against the Catholic Church can be explained only by attributing it to an inadequate understanding of the spiritual nature of the people.

The reasons why the new party engaged in a violent campaign against Rome were as follows:

As soon as the House of Habsburg had definitely decided to transform Austria into a Slav State, all sorts of means were adopted that seemed to serve that end. The Habsburg rulers had no scruples of conscience about exploiting even religious institutions in the service of this new ‘State Idea.’

One of the many methods thus employed was the use of Czech parishes and their clergy as instruments for spreading Slav hegemony throughout Austria.

This proceeding was carried out as follows:
Czech priests were appointed in purely German districts. They gradually and steadily pushed forward the interests of the Czech people before those of the Church, and thus became germ cells in the de-Germanization process.

Unfortunately the German-Austrian clergy completely failed to counter this procedure. Not only were they incapable of taking a similar initiative on the German side, but they showed themselves unable to meet the Czech offensive with adequate resistance. Germandom was accordingly pushed backwards, slowly but steadily, through the perversion of religious belief on the one side, and the lack of resistance on the other side.

Such tactics were used in dealing with the smaller problems; and in larger matters, the situation was not very different.

The anti-German aims pursued by the Habsburgs, especially through the higher clergy, didn't meet with any vigorous resistance, while the clerical representatives of the German interests withdrew completely to the rear.

The general impression could only be that the Catholic clergy as such grossly neglected the rights of the German population.

Therefore it looked as if the Catholic Church was not in sympathy with the German people, but rather that it unjustly supported their enemies. The root of the whole evil, especially in Schonerer's opinion, lay in the fact that the leadership of the Catholic Church was not in Germany, and that this fact alone accounted for the hostile attitude of the Church towards the interests of our people.

The so-called cultural problem receded almost completely into the background, as was generally the case everywhere throughout Austria at that time. In assuming a hostile attitude towards the Catholic Church, the pan-German leaders were influenced not so much by the Church's position on science, etc., but rather because of its failure to defend German rights, and conversely, its aid and support for Slavic arrogance and greed.

George Schonerer wasn't a man who did things half-way. He went into battle against the Church because he was convinced that this was the only way to save the German people. The "Away-from-Rome" movement seemed the most powerful, but at the same time most difficult, way of attacking the adversary's citadel.

Schonerer believed that if this movement succeeded, the tragic
division between the two great religious denominations in Germany would be wiped out, and the inner forces of the German Reich and nation would be enormously enhanced by such a victory.

But both the premise and the conclusion in this case were
erroneous.

It was undoubtedly true that the national powers of resistance, in everything concerning Germanism as such, were much weaker among the German Catholic clergy than among their non-German brethren, especially the Czechs.

And only a fool could be unaware of the fact that it never entered the mind of the German clergy to take the offensive on behalf of German interests.

But at the same time, everyone who isn't blind to facts must admit that all this can be attributed to a characteristic under which all we Germans must suffer: that is, the objective way in which we regard our own nationality, along with everything else.

While the Czech priest adopted a subjective attitude towards his own people and only an objective attitude towards the Church, the German priest showed a subjective devotion to his Church and remained objective in regard to his nation. This phenomenon, unfortunately, can be found occurring in exactly the same way in thousands of other cases.

It is by no means a peculiar legacy from Catholicism; but it is something in us that quickly corrodes almost every institution, especially institutions of state and those that have ideal aims.

Take, for example, the attitude of our state officials in regard to the efforts made for bringing about a national resurgence. Compare this attitude with the stand that the officials of any other nation would have taken in such a case. Or should we believe that the military officers of any other country in the world would refuse to come forward on behalf of national aspirations, and would rather hide behind the phrase ‘state authority,’ as has been the case in our country during the last five years? Or let us take another example. In regard to the Jewish question, don't both Christian denominations take up a standpoint today that responds to neither national requirements nor to real needs of religion? Compare the attitude of a Jewish rabbi towards any question, even an insignificant one, concerning Jewry as a race, with that of the majority of our clergy, whether Catholic or Protestant!

We observe the same phenomenon wherever it is a matter of defending an abstract idea. ‘State authority,’ ‘democracy,’ ‘pacifism,’ ‘international solidarity,’ etc.–all such notions become rigid, dogmatic concepts with us. And the more vital the general necessities of the nation, the more will they be judged exclusively in light of those concepts.

This unfortunate habit of looking at all national demands from the viewpoint of a pre-conceived notion makes it impossible for us to see the subjective side of a thing that objectively contradicts one's own doctrine. It finally leads to a complete reversal of means and ends. Any attempt at a national revival will be opposed if a pre-condition is that a bad and pernicious regime must first of all be overthrown; such an action will be considered as a violation of ‘state authority.’

From this standpoint, ‘state authority’ is not a means to serve an end but rather, to the mind of the dogmatic believer in objectivity, an end in itself. He looks upon that as sufficient apology for his own miserable life. Such people would raise an outcry if, for instance, anyone should attempt to set up a dictatorship, even if it were a Frederick the Great, and even though the parliamentary politicians were small and incompetent men.

To such sticklers for abstract principles, the law of democracy is more sacred than the welfare of the nation. Accordingly, such men will defend the worst kind of tyranny, though it may be leading a people to ruin, because it is the fleeting embodiment of ‘state authority.’ Others will reject even a highly beneficent government if it should fall short of their notion of ‘democracy.’

In the same way, our German pacifist will remain silent while the nation is groaning under oppression by a vicious military power, if this condition calls for active resistance; such resistance means the employment of physical force, which is against the spirit of the pacifist society. The international German socialist may be plundered by his comrades around the world in the name of ‘solidarity,’ but he responds with fraternal kindness, and never thinks of retribution, or even of self-defense. Simply because he is -- a German.

It may be unpleasant to dwell on such truths, but if something is to be changed, we must first acknowledge it.

The same is true with the weak manner in which German interests are promoted and defended by a part of the clergy.
Click to expand...

There are many more excerpts of Hitler discussing religion I'd like to copypasta but it basically boils down to: keeping politics separate from religion, and reforming Christianity from within to make it less cucked instead of using the state's authority to ban a major faith.
CHAPTER 10: THE MASK OF FEDERALISM

Hitler's analysis of the Ultramontane problem. Hitler explained in no uncertain terms how Protestant vs Catholic in-fighting is utterly destructive for the race and nation.

Ford translation:
Collage_20230727_032100.jpg


Dalton translation:
IMG_20230727_043514.jpg

CHAPTER 12: THE FIRST PERIOD OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE
NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMAN WORKERS’ PARTY

Hitler explaining why early Christianity and the Catholic Church survived over millenia while other religions from the ancient world died out, in the context of building a long-lasting political movement. Dalton translation:
Screenshot_20230727_034234.jpg
 
nagolbud said:
Says the asian larping trannies from Germany. I'm fucking German btw, and I still laugh at your gay asian faggotry. Go suck on Buddha, or some other gay shit, why you gotta larp a fag with a gay fago androgyne mustache. You can do better bro.
Click to expand...
Hitler is the greatest German in 1900 years since Hermann aka Arminius (18/17 BC – 21 AD), his life story and the brand of Socialism with German Characteristics he founded are useful, relevant and instructive. Asians wouldn't a give a rat's ass about Hitler or his writings if they were of no positive use to us. Never seen any Asian fans of Mussolini on the internet, have we?
 
DeepEcoCel said:
Didn't karenin link you an article showing that the work this quote is from is basically a complete fabrication? Also, what do you think about the jews in that video?
Click to expand...

Nazi larpers and Jew haters always post nonsense ramblings from other skin heads that debunk facts that destroy their illusion. They believe in catholic doctrine yet too stupid to figure it out. 80 year old propaganda, not really worth arguing with a china man that dick rides a tranny named Hitler. As a real German, it's funny watching faggots larp about shit they are clueless about. Fake Jews are nothing more than low tier pagan priests... not to mention you can't debunk the quotes and facts I posted. The treaty is legit, easily found in any historical document, and it's how Hitler came to power. He was nothing more than a tranny actor like Trump playing his part for big daddy Pope.



 
Karenin said:
Hitler is the greatest German in 1900 years since Hermann aka Arminius (18/17 BC – 21 AD), his life story and the brand of Socialism with German Characteristics he founded are useful, relevant and instructive. Asians wouldn't a give a rat's ass about Hitler or his writings if they were of no positive use to us. Never seen any Asian fans of Mussolini on the internet, have we?
Click to expand...

Hitler wasn't even German you fuckin twat tard.
 
nagolbud said:
Nazi larpers and Jew haters always post nonsense ramblings from other skin heads that debunk facts that destroy their illusion.
Click to expand...
I debunked your idiotic claim that Hitler supported the Vatican using the very same source you cited, braindead freak.

>Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”, (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).

Hermann Rauschning wrote Hitler saying that the Catholic Church is his enemy on the same page as your favourite copypasta.
IMG_20230905_104921.png


IMG_20230905_105232.png

nagolbud said:
you can't debunk the quotes and facts I posted.
Click to expand...
Already proved that you post fake quotations from a book you didn't read, typical Amerimutt retard.
nagolbud said:
The treaty is legit, easily found in any historical document, and it's how Hitler came to power. He was nothing more than a tranny actor like Trump playing his part for big daddy Pope.
Click to expand...
The NSDAP was elected to office and most of its voters weren't Catholic you dumb fuck. The majority of Catholics didn't vote for the Nazis because guess what, they already had the Central Party (Zentrumspartei) that was openly aligned with the Vatican.
ajps-earlyview-figure.jpg
 
Karenin said:
I debunked your idiotic claim that Hitler supported the Vatican using the very same source you cited, braindead freak.

>Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”, (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).

Hermann Rauschning wrote Hitler saying that the Catholic Church is his enemy on the same page as your favourite copypasta.
IMG_20230905_104921.png


IMG_20230905_105232.png


Already proved that you post fake quotations from a book you didn't read, typical Amerimutt retard.

The NSDAP was elected to office and most of its voters weren't Catholic you dumb fuck. The majority of Catholics didn't vote for the Nazis because guess what, they already had the Central Party (Zentrumspartei) that was openly aligned with the Vatican.
View attachment 4566
Click to expand...

There is no debunking it. It was literally a fucking treaty, signed into law. You're in a religious cult, it produces nothing but hate, no real change, no results, just internet QQ'ing over and over again. You can't even handle basic facts without twisting and manipulating to maintain your illusion of faggotry.

The Reichskonkordat is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 July 1933 by Cardinal Secretary of State.

“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before 1933, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book . . . was written by the Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.”

The Reichskonkordat is the most controversial of several concordats that the Vatican negotiated during the pontificate of Pius XI. It is frequently discussed in works that deal with the rise of Hitler in the early 1930s and the Holocaust. The concordat has been described by some as giving moral legitimacy to the Nazi regime soon after Hitler had acquired quasi-dictatorial powers through the Enabling Act of 1933, an Act itself facilitated through the support of the Catholic Centre Party.

In January 1933, Hitler became Chancellor. The passing of the Enabling Act on 23 March, in part, removed the Reichstag as an obstacle to concluding a concordat with the Vatican. Hitler offered the possibility of friendly co-operation promising not to threaten the Reichstag, the President, the States, or the Churches if granted the emergency powers. With Nazi paramilitary encircling the building, he said: "It is for you, gentlemen of the Reichstag to decide between war and peace." The Act allowed Hitler and his Cabinet to rule by emergency decree for four years, though Hindenberg remained President

bundesarchiv_bild_183-r24391_konkordatsunterzeichnung_in_rom.jpg

Pius XII (seated at center) attends the 1933 signing of the Reichskonkordat with Nazi Germany.
 
nagolbud said:
You can't even handle basic facts without twisting and manipulating to maintain your illusion of faggotry.
Click to expand...
That's a perfect description of yourself, stupid cunt. You repeatedly copypaste a fake quote that's easily exposed as fake by the most basic verification process of looking up the book cited as the source, and now you pretend that debunking a false citation is actually all about debunking the Reichskonkordat.

You don't know anything about the Reichskonkordat either, if you think a treaty banning the Vatican from criticism of the NSDAP government and barring Catholic clergy from participating in German politics is somehow evidence of Hitler supporting the Vatican LOL.
nagolbud said:
The Reichskonkordat is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 July 1933 by Cardinal Secretary of State.

The Reichskonkordat is the most controversial of several concordats that the Vatican negotiated during the pontificate of Pius XI. It is frequently discussed in works that deal with the rise of Hitler in the early 1930s and the Holocaust. The concordat has been described by some as giving moral legitimacy to the Nazi regime soon after Hitler had acquired quasi-dictatorial powers through the Enabling Act of 1933, an Act itself facilitated through the support of the Catholic Centre Party.

In January 1933, Hitler became Chancellor. The passing of the Enabling Act on 23 March, in part, removed the Reichstag as an obstacle to concluding a concordat with the Vatican. Hitler offered the possibility of friendly co-operation promising not to threaten the Reichstag, the President, the States, or the Churches if granted the emergency powers. With Nazi paramilitary encircling the building, he said: "It is for you, gentlemen of the Reichstag to decide between war and peace." The Act allowed Hitler and his Cabinet to rule by emergency decree for four years, though Hindenberg remained President
Click to expand...
t.
en.wikipedia.org

Reichskonkordat - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
IMG_20231003_084515.png

IMG_20231003_083102.png

Copypasting from a Wikipedia article without citing it is plagiarism, dumb freak, and you left out the part stating the "Nazis planned to eliminate the Church's influence by restricting its organizations to purely religious activities" as well as everything after the paragraph about the Enabling Act:

Hitler was hostile to the Catholic Church, but he was also mindful that Catholics were a large proportion of the population in Germany: almost 40% in 1933. As such, for political reasons, Hitler was prepared to restrain his anticlericalism and did not allow himself to be drawn into attacking the Church publicly as other Nazis would have liked him to do. Kershaw wrote that, following the appointment of Hitler as Chancellor by President von Hindenberg, the Vatican was anxious to reach agreement with the new government, despite "continuing molestation of Catholic clergy, and other outrages committed by Nazi radicals against the Church and its organisations".

Robert Ventresca wrote that because of increasing harassment of Catholics and Catholic clergy, Cardinal Pacelli sought quick ratification of a treaty with the government, seeking in this way to protect the German Church. When Vice-Chancellor Papen and Ambassador to the Vatican Diego von Bergen met Pacelli in late June 1933, they found him "visibly influenced" by reports of actions being taken against German Catholic interests.
 
Last edited:
Karenin said:
That's a perfect description of yourself, stupid cunt. You repeatedly copypaste a fake quote that's easily exposed as fake by the most basic verification process of looking up the book cited as the source, and now you pretend that debunking a false citation is actually all about debunking the Reichskonkordat.

You don't know anything about the Reichskonkordat either, if you think a treaty banning the Vatican from criticism of the NSDAP government and barring Catholic clergy from participating in German politics is somehow evidence of Hitler supporting the Vatican LOL.

t.
en.wikipedia.org

Reichskonkordat - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
View attachment 4686
View attachment 4685
Copypasting from a Wikipedia article without citing it is plagiarism, dumb freak, and you left out the part stating the "Nazis planned to eliminate the Church's influence by restricting its organizations to purely religious activities" as well as everything after the paragraph about the Enabling Act:

Hitler was hostile to the Catholic Church, but he was also mindful that Catholics were a large proportion of the population in Germany: almost 40% in 1933. As such, for political reasons, Hitler was prepared to restrain his anticlericalism and did not allow himself to be drawn into attacking the Church publicly as other Nazis would have liked him to do. Kershaw wrote that, following the appointment of Hitler as Chancellor by President von Hindenberg, the Vatican was anxious to reach agreement with the new government, despite "continuing molestation of Catholic clergy, and other outrages committed by Nazi radicals against the Church and its organisations".

Robert Ventresca wrote that because of increasing harassment of Catholics and Catholic clergy, Cardinal Pacelli sought quick ratification of a treaty with the government, seeking in this way to protect the German Church. When Vice-Chancellor Papen and Ambassador to the Vatican Diego von Bergen met Pacelli in late June 1933, they found him "visibly influenced" by reports of actions being taken against German Catholic interests.
Click to expand...

Yeah the treaty is fake, you're right, the jews run the world... now what are you gonna do you beta faggot? You do nothing. With what i teach i robbed the banks for 90k legally, ive lived without a social security card or birth certificate in foreign countries for 10+ years. Mean while you larp on the internet. Stfu bro. You're seriously gay as a fuckin twat faggot Hitler. YOU DO NOTHING BUT BITCH ONLINE. Meanwhile I fight back. Who's winning?
 
I've lived in like 5 countries and never had a passport. Yet you still bitching on the internet about the jews. You're a fuckin beta male.
 
nagolbud said:
With what i teach i robbed the banks for 90k legally, ive lived without a social security card or birth certificate in foreign countries for 10+ years.
Click to expand...
nagolbud said:
I've lived in like 5 countries and never had a passport. Yet you still bitching on the internet about the jews. You're a fuckin beta male.
Click to expand...
How cute Tintin, ya nuked your identification papers and fled to several Third World shitholes to avoid repaying 90k in credit card debt and bank loans.
 
nagolbud said:
And my life is beautiful, while you cap on the internet over the jews. Who's winning at life? It ain't you.
Click to expand...
LOL you cap on the Internet over Hitler, white women, Latina women, trannies, the Catholic church, other Cuckstians, and Agoraroad way more than I do about Jews, sweetie.
 

Similar threads

chudslife
TV & Music the real plan of mr beast
Replies
8
Views
191
Chudson
Chudson
ULTRAVISIONARYBLACKPILISM
The Jewish Worldview
Replies
7
Views
103
panchito88
panchito88
ULTRAVISIONARYBLACKPILISM
Serious 1923 badge of Moscow criminal investigation department Stalin & Lenin same jewish puppets.
Replies
13
Views
111
ULTRAVISIONARYBLACKPILISM
ULTRAVISIONARYBLACKPILISM
ULTRAVISIONARYBLACKPILISM
Serious The Jewish Role Behind Pedophilia
Replies
11
Views
203
Weebhunter3000
Weebhunter3000
Back
Top