Politicians who were killed for challenging the narrative

Swede Immigrant

Well-known member
Princess Diana (killed in a car crash): she wanted to help free Palestinians from Israel oppression.

General Patton (killed in a car crash): He wasn’t a politician but he was well-known to the public. Likely killed for trying to tell people the allies were the villains of WW2.

JFK (shot in his car): wanted to dismantle the banks.

Abraham Lincoln (shot dead in the theater): wanted to dismantle the banks.

Malcolm X (shot dead by multiple gunmen): Killed for being a real black nationalist.

Lumumba (killed by rebels): wanted to uplift Congo away from the west’s grasp.

Can you tell what the common theme is between all these deaths?
 
Princess Diana (killed in a car crash): she wanted to help free Palestinians from Israel oppression.

General Patton (killed in a car crash): He wasn’t a politician but he was well-known to the public. Likely killed for trying to tell people the allies were the villains of WW2.

JFK (shot in his car): wanted to dismantle the banks.

Abraham Lincoln (shot dead in the theater): wanted to dismantle the banks.

Malcolm X (shot dead by multiple gunmen): Killed for being a real black nationalist.

Lumumba (killed by rebels): wanted to uplift Congo away from the west’s grasp.

Can you tell what the common theme is between all these deaths?
they all tried to take power away from da jooos
 
JFK did recognize hitler's admirable martyrdom for the country and his legacy that lived on for another 80 years
1000061766.webp

for them, they learned too much
 
JFK did recognize hitler's admirable martyrdom for the country and his legacy that lived on for another 80 years
View attachment 4891
for them, they learned too much
JFK could’ve saved America before the corruption fully set in. How I wish things could’ve been different.
 
What about Martin Luther King Jr.? He wasn’t against the establishment, yet they slaughtered him.
 
What about Martin Luther King Jr.? He wasn’t against the establishment, yet they slaughtered him.
Even they got tired of his incessant yapping.
Albeit, in seriousness, what I've heard in the past was that his ideas of opposition to the war in Vietnam could have spread amongst his supporters if they let him continue speaking publicly for long enough, and they didn't want that. What's peculiar with that theory is that his killing happened exactly a year after a speech in New York where he first condemned the war. That speech was delivered on the fourth of April in '67, and he was slain on the fourth of April in '68.
 
Even they got tired of his incessant yapping.
Albeit, in seriousness, what I've heard in the past was that his ideas of opposition to the war in Vietnam could have spread amongst his supporters if they let him continue speaking publicly for long enough, and they didn't want that. What's peculiar with that theory is that his killing happened exactly a year after a speech in New York where he first condemned the war. That speech was delivered on the fourth of April in '67, and he was slain on the fourth of April in '68.
Someone in the government really wants their endless wars. It seems to be a recurring theme behind many of these assassinations.
 
Back
Top