Caged My distant relatives are actually sped

SiegeChud

Well-known member
Yeah thank you waffen ss relative for making me get Russian relatives who are quarter German
IMG_5117.webp
IMG_5116.webp
IMG_5115.webp
 
This is more common than you think. I have seen neo-pagan radfems before who think the "patriarchy" is jewish because Christianity brought it. Weird shit.
i mean before christian-jews came over to evangalise europe in the old Pagan-Societies both men and women were seen and respected as equals up until christian-jews came into europe and enforced the Abrahamic-Tradition of Patriarchy (which is based.) so thats why they view patriarchy as being jewish probably also patriarchy is a traditional custom of the Jewish-Culture NOTE: I hate feminism and jews but im only bringing up reasons why both dont like eachother evendoe they do beacause jews wanna destroy the west i am not defending either of these peoples nor behaviors
 
i mean before christian-jews came over to evangalise europe in the old Pagan-Societies both men and women were seen and respected as equals up until christian-jews came into europe and enforced the Abrahamic-Tradition of Patriarchy (which is based.) so thats why they view patriarchy as being jewish probably also patriarchy is a traditional custom of the Jewish-Culture NOTE: I hate feminism and jews but im only bringing up reasons why both dont like eachother evendoe they do beacause jews wanna destroy the west i am not defending either of these peoples nor behaviors
This doesn't hold up for Roman society, it was patriarchal like the Christian one was, although with some differences. The Pater Familias in Rome (as in, the father of the family) held absolute power over his children and wife, that included killing them for no reason if he wishes it. Christianity got rid of that killing without consequence part, or rather the unlimited power in general. Also, while monogamy was seen as the norm in Rome, they didn't enforce this as well as they should have. Because, while a Roman man could have only one wife, he was still allowed to have sex with his concubines (slaves) as much as he wanted to, which just ruins the whole point of monogamy. Christians generally forbid any and all sexual relations outside of marriage and encouraged kind treatment of slaves, so they got rid of that part. And, infanticide was also common in rome but infant girls were more commonly targeted, Christians were against infanticide entirely which means they got rid of this targeting of female infants too. In essence Christianity didn't destroy the Roman family unit, it just modified parts of it to make it more moral I suppose.

But anyway, what you're saying is true in the case of Norse Pagans, they had what can be called gender equality or whatever. Christians didn't like that much and relegated women to an inferior status. Same applies to women in South America before Catholics arrived.
 
This doesn't hold up for Roman society, it was patriarchal like the Christian one was, although with some differences. The Pater Familias in Rome (as in, the father of the family) held absolute power over his children and wife, that included killing them for no reason if he wishes it. Christianity got rid of that killing without consequence part, or rather the unlimited power in general. Also, while monogamy was seen as the norm in Rome, they didn't enforce this as well as they should have. Because, while a Roman man could have only one wife, he was still allowed to have sex with his concubines (slaves) as much as he wanted to, which just ruins the whole point of monogamy. Christians generally forbid any and all sexual relations outside of marriage and encouraged kind treatment of slaves, so they got rid of that part. And, infanticide was also common in rome but infant girls were more commonly targeted, Christians were against infanticide entirely which means they got rid of this targeting of female infants too. In essence Christianity didn't destroy the Roman family unit, it just modified parts of it to make it more moral I suppose.

But anyway, what you're saying is true in the case of Norse Pagans, they had what can be called gender equality or whatever. Christians didn't like that much and relegated women to an inferior status. Same applies to women in South America before Catholics arrived.
yeah but the roman-empire covered the meditearnian and not most of europe and the Germanic/Viking Tribal-Lands which were pagan and in traditional-pagan societies back then women and men were viewed and respected as equals and they had rights. (im against women's rights and feminism im just saying this doe.)
 
yeah but the roman-empire covered the meditearnian and not most of europe and the Germanic/Viking Tribal-Lands which were pagan and in traditional-pagan societies back then women and men were viewed and respected as equals and they had rights. (im against women's rights and feminism im just saying this doe.)
Pagan cucks... How are we gonna recover from this?
 
Back
Top