Moon landing debate

[OdessanBvll]

While sending a man in a rocket with a shuttle to space to fly above earth's orbit sounds possible it doesn't look real to land on Luna and other planets. A shuttle which is attached to a rocket is the body which flies to space BUT the rocket gets detached from shuttle when it runs out of fuel. If shuttle lands on moon how will it come back to earth? Nothing powers the shuttle and if it does then it's not enough to get back to Earth. Also shuttle can not land with rocket being attached to it because it's just not in shape to do so.

 

[Spas]

We don't know, goy, we lost destroyed the technology

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

*yawn*

 

[Cortex]

We never went to the moon.

History Thread 'NASA went to the moon in a rofl copter..'

Sep 28, 2024

• nagolbud
• Replies: 4
• Forum: Clown World Logs

• 

 

[1Based Frog1]

It wasn’t the shuttle itself that did all the work. The rocket got the craft out of Earth’s atmosphere. Once the rocket’s job was done, the spacecraft detached and carried its own propulsion systems for the rest of the mission.

 

[panchito]

It wasn’t the shuttle itself that did all the work. The rocket got the craft out of Earth’s atmosphere. Once the rocket’s job was done, the spacecraft detached and carried its own propulsion systems for the rest of the mission.

retards are too stubborn to comprehend this instead of saying it was...le faekd

 

[Swede Immigrant]

It wasn’t the shuttle itself that did all the work. The rocket got the craft out of Earth’s atmosphere. Once the rocket’s job was done, the spacecraft detached and carried its own propulsion systems for the rest of the mission.

retards are too stubborn to comprehend this instead of saying it was...le faekd

It’s fake. How did they lose the technology and why can’t we do it again?

 

[Seraphim]

It’s fake. How did they lose the technology and why can’t we do it again?

The reason often given is that it was simply too expensive to continue these missions. The focus shifted towards other priorities, and new technologies took precedence, meaning the expertise and equipment for lunar travel were no longer needed or maintained.

 

[Swede Immigrant]

The reason often given is that it was simply too expensive to continue these missions. The focus shifted towards other priorities, and new technologies took precedence, meaning the expertise and equipment for lunar travel were no longer needed or maintained.

That’s the most blatant and biggest lie I’ve ever heard of.

 

[Dawood]

Why do some conspiracists care about the Earth's shape or if the Moon landing was faked? I fail to see what good would come out of the truth. If America somehow lied about the moon landing, I'm happy they did. We owned the Soviets in the media battle, all those guys did was send a couple of my buddies into orbit...

 

[Spas]

Why do some conspiracists care about the Earth's shape or if the Moon landing was faked? I fail to see what good would come out of the truth. If America somehow lied about the moon landing, I'm happy they did. We owned the Soviets in the media battle, all those guys did was send a couple of my buddies into orbit...

>why do people act like there's value in truth?

 

[Cortex]

Why do some conspiracists care about the Earth's shape or if the Moon landing was faked? I fail to see what good would come out of the truth. If America somehow lied about the moon landing, I'm happy they did. We owned the Soviets in the media battle, all those guys did was send a couple of my buddies into orbit...

I personally hate being deceived and when I’m told something happened, I want to know all the facts. Otherwise, you end up with a George Floyd situation, or worse.

 

[Dawood]

>why do people act like there's value in truth?

The truth of things that have nothing to do with the lives of average people. You're just misrepresenting what I've said to make it sound like I've said something stupid. So what if the Earth was shaped like my balls or if the moon landing was faked? It doesn't mean anything to the average Joe.

I personally hate being deceived and when I’m told something happened, I want to know all the facts. Otherwise, you end up with a George Floyd situation, or worse.

Mr. Detective, please do find the facts and post them here. Thanks.

 

[Cortex]

Mr. Detective, please do find the facts and post them here. Thanks.

I was responding to your statement about there being no point to learning about the truth.

As for the moon, I only have a suspicion it was faked due to some details not adding up. If you’re genuinely interested I can try digging them up.

 

[Dawood]

I was responding to your statement about there being no point to learning about the truth.

As for the moon, I only have a suspicion it was faked due to some details not adding up. If you’re genuinely interested I can try digging them up.

Yes, it'd be cool to see

 

[Spas]

The truth of things that have nothing to do with the lives of average people. You're just misrepresenting what I've said to make it sound like I've said something stupid. So what if the Earth was shaped like my balls or if the moon landing was faked? It doesn't mean anything to the average Joe.

>shieeee mayne, like who cares nigguh? So what if it's true, it's got nuffin to do with me! shieee just a waste of time dawg, ion get you ytpipo being so concerned about these "higher concepts" like trufh and honor and sheit. just eat sum chickin, cuh

Yes, it'd be cool to see

>shie, I suppose it would be interestin' after all

 

[Cortex]

Yes, it'd be cool to see

You know how they brought back moon rocks? Meteorites have been found in Antarctica which have been proven to be made of the same material. In 1967, two years before Apollo 11, NASA set up an expedition to Antarctica. Reason why that's important is because the region of the Earth with the biggest concentration of meteorites is located in Antarctica.

Also, some of the moon rocks have been proven to be fake. 40 years after having been handed personally by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin to the Dutch prime minister, it was proven to be petrified wood.

'Moon rock' given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin is fake

A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake.

www.telegraph.co.uk

Besides that, we have the whole "we destroyed the technology to do it again" which is grounds for suspicion.

Then we have this video, an interview with the astronauts:

You can tell they all looked nervous and unhappy, which is not something you'd expect from men who had just accomplished the near impossible.

 

[Cortex]

I can't believe I put in all that effort just to have no response. Might as well be speaking aimlessly into the pitch dark blackhole of eternal loneliness.

 

[SoytanEnthusiast]

It’s fake. How did they lose the technology and why can’t we do it again?

Didn't pajeets go on the moon like last year or whatever

 

[Spas]

Didn't pajeets go on the moon like last year or whatever

 

[Cortex]

View attachment 3637

Wow, just great. From all of Kenya and Africa we say congratulations to ISRO and India.

 

[THE TRUE DIGLET]

I can't believe I put in all that effort just to have no response. Might as well be speaking aimlessly into the pitch dark blackhole of eternal loneliness.

 

[panchito]

The truth of things that have nothing to do with the lives of average people. You're just misrepresenting what I've said to make it sound like I've said something stupid. So what if the Earth was shaped like my balls or if the moon landing was faked? It doesn't mean anything to the average Joe.

the average ngubu didn't care about progress and they were still doing tribe wars with sticks and stones while europeans geggin' colonized them

 

[panchito]

I can't believe I put in all that effort just to have no response. Might as well be speaking aimlessly into the pitch dark blackhole of eternal loneliness.

write it in a notebook or something someone's ought to find it someday

 

[SiegeChud]

i just don't see why they would go about faking it what would they gain alongside how much it would cost to do this