If you search up this domain...

But you know what's strange? Website owners can block unwanted domains from redirecting to their website, yet the Whitehouse decides not to. Really makes you think.
This does not square with my understanding of DNS. Can you explain what you mean? How would you block such a domain?
 
This does not square with my understanding of DNS. Can you explain what you mean? How would you block such a domain?
You can use .htaccess rules to block specific referrer URLs or user agents.

Or if you have Cloudflare, you can implement Page Rule with a Forwarding Rule 301 to a non-existing page.
 
Who do you think did this?
Antifa, probably.
Nonetheless, in seriousness, if you look up the domain with ICANN, you can find a tiny bit of information on it. It was last updated in March of this year and the identity of the holder is protected using withheldforprivacy.com (this is why the phone number and mailing address match several other domains with similarly withheld information, like a mailing address in Reykjavik.)
Because of this privacy measure, all of the details that we can actually see are its date of expiration (April 2026, unless it's renewed), its date of creation (April 2002), and the time of its most recent update (March of this year, as I said). So, there's no way to tell who is behind it.
 
Back
Top