chuds.life
Chuds.life is a forum dedicated to discussing politically incorrect content. You can sign-up to create an account or you may post as a guest. Please read our rules as guest posters have restricted privileges.

I loathe and despise kikelovers even more than I dislike kikes

Karenin

卐 Nazi sympathizer
Joined
Jun 11, 2023
Messages
1,264
Can't even escape kike subversion here in Asia because rich piefaces have a boner for (((prestigious))) Western institutions, which have been thoroughly corrupted by kikes since the 1980s, and so they parrot and impose on the rest of us such kike garbage as
-Diversity Inclusion Equity (literally 'DIE' jfl) initiatives for all organisations
-corporate ESG to make companies DIE, figuratively and literally
-whore-listic (holistic) academics, which is actually a pretext for offering a place to a stupid slut instead of a qualified male because the slut has "an amazing personality"
There's also the significant detail that many of these elite piefaces became wealthy and powerful in the first place by demonstrating to the elite kike/kikeloving gatekeepers of akikedemia their willingness to be shabbos goyim useful idiots and get hired by kike investment banks and globoshlomo con-sulting agencies/think tanks straight out of college.
 
That’s why I loathe Christianity. The entire religion, from its origins to its teachings, are centered around Jews. All the support Israel gets is because these kike sympathizers believe they are the chosen people of God. If it wasn’t for them we wouldn’t be having this conversation right now.
 
That’s why I loathe Christianity. The entire religion, from its origins to its teachings, are centered around Jews. All the support Israel gets is because these kike sympathizers believe they are the chosen people of God. If it wasn’t for them we wouldn’t be having this conversation right now.
Christianity was created by people that hated jews.
1417660159464.png
1599774054651.jpg

No idea why moder christians suck their circumcised cock so much. I guess this religion got sabotage by (((them)))
 
That’s why I loathe Christianity. The entire religion, from its origins to its teachings, are centered around Jews. All the support Israel gets is because these kike sympathizers believe they are the chosen people of God. If it wasn’t for them we wouldn’t be having this conversation right now.
You'll like this article by Revilo P. Oliver: https://nationalvanguard.org/2017/07/western-christianity/

Western Christianity​

Bradford Hanson BRADFORD HANSON (EDITOR) · 28 JULY, 2017
Crusader cathedral in Frombork, Poland

WHEN OUR Germanic ancestors invaded and occupied the decadent Roman Empire, it was deeply infected with Christianity, a Jewish cult that had been foisted onto the mongrelized inhabitants of the great empire that had been created by Aryans. Thus our ancestors contracted the alien religion while they inherited, as best they could, the ruins of the civilization that had been created by their race.
Christianity has always been deleterious to our race, and if the Roman Empire had to succumb to an imported religion, one could wish in retrospect that the victor in the competition for political power had been the Mithraic cult, which was at least manly and which the Christians so closely emulated in many matters, though not in its virtues.
If the civilized world had to succumb to Christianity, one could wish that the sect that attained political power had been the Marcionist, which had partly emancipated itself from the rancours and myths of the Jewish proletariat and was, at least, sufficiently rational to see that the figure of the supposedly incarnate and universal god, Jesus, was incompatible with a ferocious tribal deity, the Big Jew of the “Old Testament.” But that, too, is idle speculation about what (conceivably) might have been.
When the wily Fathers of the Church got their hot little hands on political power and began to stamp out the competition, they had to make some drastic revisions of the primitive cult to make it compatible with a society they now wished to preserve and enjoy.
When the Germanic invaders were infected by the religion, even more drastic changes were necessary to make the official cult acceptable to warriors. The changes were easily made, since all that the majority knew of the religion was what its dervishes chose to tell them. The pallid, pacifistic, ineffectual Jesus was, for example, represented as having been in some way an heroic figure, worthy of Vikings. Thus was formed what we call Western Christianity.
It retained for centuries the poisonous superstition that destroyed much of our race’s best genetic heritage by diverting women into convents, where celibacy had often to be maintained by abortions or infanticide, and males into monasteries, where morbid and mentally perturbing sexual abstinence was the alternative to homosexuality or furtive promiscuity without living offspring. But the religion did not prevent the eventual establishment of stable states, did inspire some monumental achievements, such as the great cathedrals, and did provide a bond of union for foreign conquest, as in the Crusades. One must regret that when the genetically baneful function of the religion was eliminated by the Lutheran and Anglican Reformations, the bond of European unity was simultaneously shattered and the religion destroyed itself in the disastrous Wars of Religion it brought upon the civilized world.
Although we may regret its passing, Western Christianity was always an artificial composite of incompatible and indeed antithetical elements and so it always exhibited a duality of internal contradictions, which made a Christian nation, considered as a whole, seem schizophrenic.
Even within the clergy there was an ill-concealed conflict between two incompatible and indeed irreconcilable mental attitudes. The antithesis is succinctly and neatly illustrated by the first two selections in Professor Leo M. Kaiser’s anthology, Early American Latin Verse (Chicago, Bolchazy-Carducci, c. 1984). The two are, I suppose, the earliest specimens of respectable Latin verse written in North America that the editor’s diligent researches discovered, and both are by English clergymen who visited the colonies in the early Seventeenth Century.
The Reverend Mr. William Morrell visited Massachusetts in 1623-25 and wrote some three hundred passably smooth, if uninspired, hexameters, describing the land and the Indians he had seen, whose superstitions he remodeled in his own mind to interpret them in terms of Christian ditheism. He ends by enjoining on Christians their sacred duty to help the benighted Indians. He had the missionary’s itch to crowd Jesus’s Heaven with black, brown, red, yellow, and drab souls and to commit treason to our race by imparting to alien and necessarily rival races the arts and techniques on which depends the precarious superiority by which alone we can survive in a hostile world.
The second clergyman was the Reverend Mr. Philip Vincent, who, after the death of his beloved wife, traveled extensively in Europe and visited Connecticut in 1637, the year in which the Pequot Indians killed an English trader. The inhabitants of the little colony, under Major Mason and Captain Underhill, attacked the stockade in which the tribe thought itself secure, killed a good part of the Indians and then pursued the fugitives, overtaking and killing them. Some captives were taken and sold to slave-traders for export to the West Indies. A few Pequot escaped, and their enemies, Mohawks, took care of most of them. The tribe became extinct.
The Reverend Mr. Vincent succinctly celebrated the colonists’ victory in well-turned elegiac couplets. There isn’t the slightest hint of a mawkish wish to do good to the aborigines. The destruction of the Pequot tribe, he said, produced peace in the only possible way. It was an admirable example of effective action and it permitted conversion of the wilderness to the agrarian fertility of civilization:
Plaudite qui colitis Mavortia sacra nepotes,
et serat incultos tutus arator agros.
And Vincent exultantly foresees the time when all of the New World will have become a new and more spacious England. Vincent was a clergyman, but he was also a realist, worthy of his race. He understood that whatever may be true in theological doctrine, we live in a world subject to natural laws, and that the first law of nations is that the strong and resolute survive, while the weak and fanciful go under. He was a clergyman, but his was the Christianity that had been adapted to Aryan civilization.
If Christianity today were Vincent’s manly religion, free of sickly illusions and masochistic delusions, our race would not be committing suicide. And we would not have to overlook a very few honorable exceptions and bluntly denounce the religion in all its diverse cults as a spiritual syphilis that has now reached the tertiary stage, paresis and insanity.
* * *
Source: Liberty Bell magazine, July 1989
LH Collins
21 July, 2021 6:35 pm
For all the crowing about how Christianity gave us White Europeans unity and “civilisation” (for that to work, let’s pretend the Greeks, Romans, Celts, Minoans and Hittites weren’t civilised and were waiting for some Judeans to teach them morality), all they did was pal-it-up with the authorities and obliterate the true spiritualism of Europeans Man. What SHOULD be seen as an affront to the native culture of White men is instead seen as the greatest favour in the history done in the history of the human race. No one asked some foreign Semite; a man who once balked at healing the daughter of a Canaanite because “one does not take the Children’s [Jews] bread and give it to the Dogs [gentile mutts]” (Matthew 15:26), to “sacrifice” himself for the world. Also, a sacrifice would have been more meaningful if he did not come from the dead. As a god, he pulled off an elaborate magic trick, got people upset, then revealed he was alive and told them the world was redeemed by Jesus’ sacrifice, or some gibberish. I’m not moved and amazed that Jesus performed some street-performer-level hocus-pocus. We were robbed of our true beliefs and knowledge of our heritage. I would rather that we still had those things not have heard of the name “Jesus Christ”.
I don’t apologise for our ancestors’ colonialism, but I DO regret past Christian missionary work. I regret robbing native peoples of their religions/superstitions. Also, why would I want to spend an eternity in Christian heaven with a bunch of primitive, cognitively-stunted ooga-booga folk? What’s the appeal in that?
 
nigger wat, nagolbud <3s "the real jews" who were all exterminated in 800BC by Babylonians according to him. I'm talking about walking, breathing Judensau here not a bunch of ancient Levantine corpses.
Based and final solution-pilled. The jew is the incarnation of the lie. A wise man once said: "And if the international jewery throws the nations in another world war, will the result not be the victory of the jews, BUT THE COMPLETE AND ABSOLUTE ANNIHILATION OF THE JEWISH RACE IN EUROPE!!!"
It sounds so much sharper in german.
 
Based and final solution-pilled. The jew is the incarnation of the lie. A wise man once said: "And if the international jewery throws the nations in another world war, will the result not be the victory of the jews, BUT THE COMPLETE AND ABSOLUTE ANNIHILATION OF THE JEWISH RACE IN EUROPE!!!"
It sounds so much sharper in german.
so how does it look in german? and who said it?
 
LOL. Cuckstian Identity-copers are inveterate liars and retards. These jokers post a 1938 newspaper article stating clearly that National Socialism rejects Cuckstianity ("paganism of Nazidom"), and Hitler was simply worried about pissing off Papist-controlled Italy with overt displays of anti-Cuckholism, yet somehow conclude that Hitler "mentioned" the notion of pagans being "degenerates".
Screenshot_20230726_031513.jpg
 
LOL. Cuckstian Identity-copers are inveterate liars and retards. These jokers post a 1938 newspaper article stating clearly that National Socialism rejects Cuckstianity ("paganism of Nazidom"), and Hitler was simply worried about pissing off Papist-controlled Italy with overt displays of anti-Cuckholism, yet somehow conclude that Hitler "mentioned" the notion of pagans being "degenerates".
View attachment 2214
still, what was the religion of him?
 
Do you know where he stated this?
You can infer Hitler's religious beliefs and position on Cuckstianity from reading Mein Kampf, at least to the extent that they were formed in 1923 when he was 34 years old, in jail and with zero political experience. Cuckstian Identity-copers never show the full context where Hitler talked about the "the Lord", "Creator", "God", "Will of God" or the one-liner about the "greatness of Christianity" jfl. He certainly was not referring to the Cuckstian god of Yahweh, Son & Holy Spirit, Inc. Here's translator Thomas Dalton's analysis of Hitler's use of religious language in Mein Kampf:
Screenshot_20230727_035126.jpg

We know that Hitler's mildly favourable view of Cuckstianity had changed by 1941-1942, when he met Henry Picker who compiled his conversations from that period as Hitler's Table Talk.
https://nationalvanguard.org/2021/06/adolf-hitler-on-religion/ Hitler's disdain for Cuckstianity in the later years of the Reich is supported by Goebbels' diaries, and is caused entirely by the kike-loving behaviour of churches and Christcucks.
Collage_20230727_045706.jpg


Cuckstian-copers' favourite "Pro-Cuckstian" Hitler quote comes from the end of the second chapter, Years of Suffering in Vienna. Christcucks always leave out the preceding sentence about "Eternal Nature" cuz it sounds paganish. Left is Ford translation, right is Dalton translation.
Collage_20230727_033335.jpg

Other parts of Mein Kampf make clear Hitler regarded the laws of the natural world shaping race and survival as "the profound will of Nature" and considered it equivalent to the "Creator" and "Will of God".
Screenshot_20230727_030522.jpg


The next major mention of "God" occurs within Hitler's analysis of the Ultramontane problem aka how kikes manipulated Cuckstian denominations against each other after WW1 to distract the goyim. Hitler explained in no uncertain terms how Cuckstian in-fighting, which is the vast majority of European Cuckstianity, is utterly destructive for the race and nation.
Only an inveterate Christcuck liar would pluck the few sentences mentioning "God" in the middle of a discussion about the weaknesses of Cuckstianity and spin it as "evidence" of Hitler believing in the Cuckstian god. Ford translation:
Collage_20230727_032100.jpg

Dalton translation:
IMG_20230727_043514.jpg


>greatness of christianity blabla
The context makes plain that "greatness" is used as a synonym for "power" or "strength" jfl, Hitler was explaining why early Cuckstianity survived and thrived while other religions from the ancient world died out. Dalton translation:
Screenshot_20230727_034234.jpg
 
Can't even escape kike subversion here in Asia because rich piefaces have a boner for (((prestigious))) Western institutions, which have been thoroughly corrupted by kikes since the 1980s, and so they parrot and impose on the rest of us such kike garbage as
-Diversity Inclusion Equity (literally 'DIE' jfl) initiatives for all organisations
-corporate ESG to make companies DIE, figuratively and literally
-whore-listic (holistic) academics, which is actually a pretext for offering a place to a stupid slut instead of a qualified male because the slut has "an amazing personality"
There's also the significant detail that many of these elite piefaces became wealthy and powerful in the first place by demonstrating to the elite kike/kikeloving gatekeepers of akikedemia their willingness to be shabbos goyim useful idiots and get hired by kike investment banks and globoshlomo con-sulting agencies/think tanks straight out of college.
What part of asia are you in? I know south korea is a kikes playground now.
 
Other parts of Mein Kampf make clear Hitler regarded the laws of the natural world shaping race and survival as "the profound will of Nature" and considered it equivalent to the "Creator" and "Will of God".
So if I’m understanding correctly, he regards the laws of the natural world as sacred, but does not necessarily believe in a divine being.
 
So if I’m understanding correctly, he regards the laws of the natural world as sacred, but does not necessarily believe in a divine being.
He believed in a higher power that "created" the universe (not Cuckstian Creationism) and expresses its "divine order" in the unforgiving laws of nature governing evolution and the struggle for existence, but absolutely not any kind of anthropomorphic deity or personal god. In that regard his religious beliefs are closest to Deism, the same worldview as the US Founding Fathers and other Enlightenment intellectuals. Hitler also had a strong superstitious belief that his own life and destiny was influenced by a higher power (not the Jewsus-Yahweh-Spirit triune God) he refers to as "Providence".
 
Debating with a Hitler worshipper is like debating a Trumplodyte. Both have vaginas and wives with cocks but people still clap their hands and tell you to vote.

 
Debating with a Hitler worshipper is like debating a Trumplodyte. Both have vaginas and wives with cocks but people still clap their hands and tell you to vote.


Lol most Nazis recognize the futility of voting. Hitler himself didn't win the majority of the vote.
Most are also disillusioned with zion don.
 
>MUHH CONQUISTADORS

>MUH SATANISM
1667413175567094.jpg

Rofl copter. That's why they all speak Hebrew and not Spanish and Portuguese... oh wait. Sucks when reality doesn't align with your PsyOp doesn't it?
 
Lol most Nazis recognize the futility of voting. Hitler himself didn't win the majority of the vote.
Most are also disillusioned with zion don.

Hitler was funded and propped up by the Vatican. Open a history book.

The Reichskonkordat is a treaty negotiated between the Vatican and the emergent Nazi Germany. It was signed on 20 July 1933 by Cardinal Secretary of State.

“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before 1933, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book . . . was written by the Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.”

“Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did Lenin too, as far as I recall. The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the [Roman] Catholic Church. There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the [Nazi] Party.” – Adolph Hitler “Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”, (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).

hitler1.jpg


DERP DERP DERP
 
“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before 1933, but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book . . . was written by the Jesuit controlled Father Bernhardt Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.”

“Above all I have learned from the Jesuits. And so did Lenin too, as far as I recall. The world has never known anything quite so splendid as the hierarchical structure of the [Roman] Catholic Church. There were quite a few things I simply appropriated from the Jesuits for the use of the [Nazi] Party.”
Hermann Rauschning, former national-socialist chief of the government of Dantzig: “Hitler m’a dit”, (Ed. Co-operation, Paris 1939, pp.266, 267, 273 ss).
Yeah, for some reason I doubt you found these English sentences in a French translation of a German book that's been exposed as historical fiction :hitler:

Swiss Historian Exposes Anti-Hitler Rauschning Memoir as Fraudulent​

rauschningby Mark Weber
VIRTUALLY EVERY major biography of Adolf Hitler or history of the Third Reich quotes from the memoir of Hermann Rauschning (pictured), a former National Socialist Senate President of Danzig. In the book published in Britain as Hitler Speaks (London, 1939) and in America as The Voice of Destruction (New York, 1940) Rauschning presents page after page of what are purported to be Hitler’s most intimate views and plans for the future. They are allegedly based on a hundred or so private conversations between the two men.
Now, after more than forty years, a Swiss historian has thoroughly exposed this supposed document of Hitler’s madness as completely fraudulent. Wolfgang Haenel presented the results of his research to the annual conference in May 1983 of the Ingolstadt Contemporary History Research Center in West Germany.
Rauschning’s Hitler is nothing more than a nihilistic revolutionary utterly lacking in ideas, goals, principles or systematic ideology who demagogically exploited words and men to accumulate power for its own sake. He was a clever but completely unscrupulous opportunist who believed nothing of what he said. His National Socialism, according to Rauschning, was just a “Revolution of Nihilism.” He was allegedly preoccupied with war. His numerous disarmament proposals and peace offers were just hypocritical rhetoric designed to mislead his future victims.
Of the man who unified Germany, Hitler is supposed to have said: “Bismarck was stupid. He was just a Protestant.” He allegedly rebuked Rauschning for his qualms: “Why do you babble about brutality and get upset over suffering. The masses want that. They need some cruelty.” “I want a violent, masterful, fearless, cruel youth,” he is quoted as saying. On another occasion, Hitler reportedly declared: “Yes, we are barbarians. We want to be barbarians. It is an honorable title.”
Wolfgang Haenel spent many years in detailed research, text comparison and interviewing contemporary witnesses. He found that instead of “about a hundred conversations” with Hitler, Rauschning actually met with the German leader only four or five times. And these few meetings were neither private nor lengthy, but always in the company of high ranking officials while visiting Hitler in Berlin or Obersalzberg. Rauschning never had the opportunity to hear Hitler’s intimate views or secret plans for the future, as he boasted in his spurious “memoir.”
Haenel shows that some of the words attributed to Hitler by Rauschning were actually lifted from the works of Ernst Juenger and Friedrich Nietzsche. Hitler is quoted as making statements which could not possibly have been made at the times alleged. Some quotes supposedly made in private were in fact taken from speeches made by Hitler after 1935, the year Rauschning left for France. Haenel also exposes serious contradictions between events as presented by Rauschning and the way they actually occurred, as in the case of an alleged conversation following the Reichstag fire of March 1933.
Haenel shows that the spurious memoir was commissioned by some French journalists and New York publishing firms as a literary weapon in the propaganda war against National Socialist Germany. For many years the amount paid to the financially strapped Rauschning for his work remained a record in France for a political book.
adolf_hitler_The democratic mass media, which devoted endless columns of print and hours of broadcast time in denouncing the so-called Hitler diaries as phony, characteristically ignored the story of the exposure of this great historical hoax. An exception was the generally sober West German daily Die Welt (19 May) which, however, buried its report on page 21. The U.S. daily press published nothing.
To his credit, American historian John Toland made no use of the Rauschning work in his detailed study, Adolf Hitler. And German historian Werner Maser noted in his biography of Hitler that “Rauschning’s statements may, at best, be considered a secondary historical source. They have no documentary value.”
It is always easier to produce a forged document or phony memoir than to prove it false. But it’s still remarkable that it took this long for someone to expose the Rauschning work as fraudulent. Any open-minded reader familiar with the literature on Hitler can determine rather quickly that The Voice of Destruction is an imaginative concoction. It simply lacks the “feel” of authenticity. In contrast, the genuine memoir of Otto Wagener, Hitler aus naechster Naehe, provides lengthy and detailed insights into Hitler’s thinking and private views. As first chief of Staff of the SA (“Brown Shirts”) and Director of the Economic Political Department of the National Socialist Party, Wagener got to know Hitler intimately. They spent hundreds of hours together between 1929 and 1932, many of them alone.
The Ingolstadt Contemporary History Research Center deserves credit for its role in exposing this great fraud. Its director, Dr. Alfred Schickel, has authored numerous substantial revisionist historical essays.
Wolfgang Haenel’s long overdue debunking of the Rauschning memoir is a welcome contribution to the slow and painful process of clarification in an age of historical obfuscation. https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/0...-anti-hitler-rauschning-memoir-as-fraudulent/
 
Back
Top Bottom