okaysomevampires
Active member
BPD stands for borderline personality disorder. (Bipolar is a different thing but also about emotions) So basically when someone doesn't chill out, emotions stick with them longer or something like that. Colloquially, it just means crazy bitches.
I suspect that redpill alpha manospherers give advice that only works on a particular sort of novelty-seeking and emotionally high-inertia woman. Then they observe women through the lens of these women, whom they have most experience with.
If you think about it, the sort of marginal woman you're going to score with some charismatic "game" is going to be of a particular type. Obviously if you're using game you aren't drawing from your sustainable, achievable level of women. Not your "looksmax" in a 1:1 pairing sense, your "looksmax" in the sense of who is actually going to pair up with you. Not saying something is or isn't fair, just saying that if you use 300 IQ charismatic tactics you're aiming for women who are otherwise out of your reach.
So what sort of woman effectively lowers her standards for a guy who makes an impression on her? What sort of woman becomes (temporarily) obsessed with a guy who approaches her and hits her with a real zinger? I don't know if I can say this clinically lines up exactly with BPD or whatever,
I'm just saying that they're going to meet a bunch of flighty, neurotic and suggestible sluts because that's built into the goals that made the community that designed their methods.
It might be that you could date down or at your own level with red pill alpha male tactics and score a regular wholesome sweetheart girl- or maybe the methods are too specialized to the redpiller's niche prey, and you'll fumble a good girl for no reason.
I'm no incelologist but I think blackpill is downstream of redpill. Redpillers identified NAWALT (Not All Women Are Like That) and probably based their AWALT observations of the 1/100 or 1/1000 women who responded well to their methods. (Or maybe they have higher rates of success, idk) I highly suspect they are right about some stuff like women being more hive-minded than men, women being shallowly materialistic, or contemporary Western women pursuing novelty above romance- but they are going to overestimate the prevalence of some stuff because they've made their own hell.
All this implies that a high leverage true alpha redpiller tactic should be getting yourself committed to a psych ward.
Of course this also means that insights redpillers draw from women who are much less attractive romantic prospects than they are will be more accurate characterizations of the population as a whole, especially if they let their guard down and forego their usual tactics in such a pursuit.
You could say something about alpha male "time to mock women" podcasts doing stuff like this too, but I haven't really watched them so I'd just be restating criticism I've heard elsewhere.
I suspect that redpill alpha manospherers give advice that only works on a particular sort of novelty-seeking and emotionally high-inertia woman. Then they observe women through the lens of these women, whom they have most experience with.
If you think about it, the sort of marginal woman you're going to score with some charismatic "game" is going to be of a particular type. Obviously if you're using game you aren't drawing from your sustainable, achievable level of women. Not your "looksmax" in a 1:1 pairing sense, your "looksmax" in the sense of who is actually going to pair up with you. Not saying something is or isn't fair, just saying that if you use 300 IQ charismatic tactics you're aiming for women who are otherwise out of your reach.
So what sort of woman effectively lowers her standards for a guy who makes an impression on her? What sort of woman becomes (temporarily) obsessed with a guy who approaches her and hits her with a real zinger? I don't know if I can say this clinically lines up exactly with BPD or whatever,
(But BPD does involve some level of dissociation, which is associated with high susceptibility to hypnosis in some other mental conditions)
It might be that you could date down or at your own level with red pill alpha male tactics and score a regular wholesome sweetheart girl- or maybe the methods are too specialized to the redpiller's niche prey, and you'll fumble a good girl for no reason.
I'm no incelologist but I think blackpill is downstream of redpill. Redpillers identified NAWALT (Not All Women Are Like That) and probably based their AWALT observations of the 1/100 or 1/1000 women who responded well to their methods. (Or maybe they have higher rates of success, idk) I highly suspect they are right about some stuff like women being more hive-minded than men, women being shallowly materialistic, or contemporary Western women pursuing novelty above romance- but they are going to overestimate the prevalence of some stuff because they've made their own hell.
All this implies that a high leverage true alpha redpiller tactic should be getting yourself committed to a psych ward.
Of course this also means that insights redpillers draw from women who are much less attractive romantic prospects than they are will be more accurate characterizations of the population as a whole, especially if they let their guard down and forego their usual tactics in such a pursuit.
You could say something about alpha male "time to mock women" podcasts doing stuff like this too, but I haven't really watched them so I'd just be restating criticism I've heard elsewhere.
