Conspiracy Has anyone ever thought about how the fuck brenton tarrant was able to kill 50 people?

He had a good/lucky choice of timing and target and his weapony choice during the various stages of the shooting were also very good
It's nothong someone level headed with a good plan can't think of but him keeping his cool and being able to navigate the situation and managing to be arrested alive really makes me question if he had expert instruction
 
Here's an interesting video regarding the legitimacy of the incident (that's half a megabyte too large to be uploaded here but I also don't want to compress it any more than it already). At around 3:30 he talks about the most interesting incongruity. Seemingly, there is a magazine on the mosque floor after he first enters it and after backing out of the the large room he picks it up and inserts it into his rifle.

It's interesting because it makes no sense either way (though obviously leaning towards fake). If it's real, why would his magazine be waiting there for him? If it's fake... well again, why would his magazine be waiting for him there and why would he pick it up and load it like it's a part of the script? Unless I'm missing something (timeline got fucked up), it's quite puzzling.
Link is down, but depending on the vid's quality, it could not be seen due to quality loss or it simply didn't get caught by his camera, later on in the stream he complained about his mags falling everywhere
 
Here's an interesting video regarding the legitimacy of the incident (that's half a megabyte too large to be uploaded here but I also don't want to compress it any more than it already). At around 3:30 he talks about the most interesting incongruity. Seemingly, there is a magazine on the mosque floor after he first enters it and after backing out of the the large room he picks it up and inserts it into his rifle.

It's interesting because it makes no sense either way (though obviously leaning towards fake). If it's real, why would his magazine be waiting there for him? If it's fake... well again, why would his magazine be waiting for him there and why would he pick it up and load it like it's a part of the script? Unless I'm missing something (timeline got fucked up), it's quite puzzling.

Counter point: In the video you can actually see his mags fall on the floor, and like butz said later on he bitches about losing a few mags.

I understand why you would think think though :thinking:
 
Link is down
dogshit website
it could not be seen due to quality loss or it simply didn't get caught by his camera, later on in the stream he complained about his mags falling everywhere
In the video it looks like the mag is sitting in the exact spot as he enters the mosque for the first time, then again it could just be a very convenient artifact lining up with the exact spot his mag later falls down. As I said, the detail is weird regardless of the legitimacy of the shooting.
 
Seriously, 50 people is absurd, There's no way a commoner even with gun training can achieve all of that. He surely either had some sort of secret training from intelligence agencies or something. I mean what do you think he did during his world travels? Also suspicious how his camera cut off before he reached the second mosque

here's my theories
1. This guy had professional training he received from intelligence agencies or something during his travels
2. The mass media is lying about the casualty counts for some reason

Also it's easy to get a high kill count when your targets are old grandads and children praying in a mosque and you're using high power magazine fed rifles
 
proof.webp
 
> No viable sources.
its a direct analysis of the video it doesn't need a "viable source" or whatever that means

He just points at fucking video artifacting and barely noticable changes and says it's staged.
Do you really think brenton used a shitty camera? The places where those "artifacts" are are very inconvenient and much of a coincidence then, also the video points out other details. Out of all discussion about shooter videos like peyton gendron i haven't heard of anyone blaming artifacts

Look man i don't understand why you want to "prove" the shooting is fake, there are aftermath photos and videos. Have you seen the video from the second mosque?
That shit could also be faked aswell, Wraps screaming and fake blood planted evidence etc, If they could go through the effort to fake the footage why not the aftermath?

I still can't read this
 
Look man i don't understand why you want to "prove" the shooting is fake, there are aftermath photos and videos. Have you seen the video from the second mosque?
I'd rather question what I see than blindly follow the herd. In this case there are legitimate reasons to be suspicious of the event when you factor in the previous terrorist association.
 
its a direct analysis of the video it doesn't need a "viable source" or whatever that means


Do you really think brenton used a shitty camera? The places where those "artifacts" are are very inconvenient and much of a coincidence then, also the video points out other details. Out of all discussion about shooter videos like peyton gendron i haven't heard of anyone blaming artifacts


That shit could also be faked aswell, Wraps screaming and fake blood planted evidence etc, If they could go through the effort to fake the footage why not the aftermath?


I still can't read this

1. By viable source i mean someting to prove it's fake not just some nigger looking at the screen and going "fake"

2. Yes, the original stream was recocrded in like 480p

3. Don't make me post that aftermath picture of that dnb

4. I don't know what to tell you regarding the image, open it in your desktop
 
At 3m09s, when examining the face size, skin texture, lighting, edge artifacts, perspective, and color balance, the face appears to be digitally altered or inserted.

Nigger he is grasping at straws now, not even a visual just telling me what's different
 
Nigger he is grasping at straws now, not even a visual just telling me what's different
I can't upload the whole pdf here because it's too big but if the video is too vauge then look at the original analysis pdf in this article

https://cairnsnews.org/2025/08/26/forensic-report-declares-banned-nz-mosque-shooting-video-as-fake/

1. By viable source i mean someting to prove it's fake not just some nigger looking at the screen and going "fake"
he's not some random nigger he has 14 years of experience as a digital analysis, did you watch the beginning of the video? he is an expert not some random

2. Yes, the original stream was recocrded in like 480p
Even IF it is an artifact it happened in very odd and coincidental places

Don't make me post that aftermath picture of that dnb
wdym
 
I can't upload the whole pdf here because it's too big but if the video is too vauge then look at the original analysis pdf in this article

https://cairnsnews.org/2025/08/26/forensic-report-declares-banned-nz-mosque-shooting-video-as-fake/


he's not some random nigger he has 14 years of experience as a digital analysis, did you watch the beginning of the video? he is an expert not some random


Even IF it is an artifact it happened in very odd and coincidental places


wdym

1. No reputable sources to prove he has 14 years

2. There is a aftermath picture and it's just a dnb, i can't upload it but it looks completly real
 
Back
Top