This is a male-only forum created to discuss politically incorrect content and archive information deleted from the mainstream internet. We strive to make this site a haven from the leftist control of modern society and the internet.

Debunking Jews' lies about Hitler


卐 Nazi sympathizer
#1: "Hitler's paternal grandfather was possibly non-Aryan"

Kikes and shabbos goys in media and academia love to exaggerate the significance of the illegitimate birth of Adolf's father, Alois Schicklgruber Snr. (later Alois Hitler Snr.), in order to keep alive the rumour that Adolf's paternal grandfather might have been a non-Aryan. The most outrageous yet endlessly-named candidate for Hitler's un-Aryan grandfather is a 19-year-old (!) Jew named Leo Frankenberger. These rumours have been conclusively disproven by DNA testing.

In 2010, the Belgian journalist Jean Paul Mulders and historian Marc Vermeeran performed DNA tests on saliva samples from Alexander Stuart-Houston (Alois Snr's great-grandson from his first son Alois Hitler Jr) and patrilineal descendants of the Hiedler family, the results conclusively prove that Alois Snr's biological father, that is Adolf's paternal grandfather, was not a kike or non-Aryan but indeed one of the Hiedler brothers, either Johann Nepomuk Hiedler (who was also the maternal great-grandfather of Hitler's mother) or Johann Georg Hiedler, the long-established "official" Hitler forebear claimed by Alois and Adolf themselves. Johann George was cohabiting with Hitler's paternal grandmother, Maria Schicklgruber, around the time she conceived Alois Snr., and married her a few years after the birth.

The DNA findings aren't even mentioned in the Wikipedia articles on Adolf Hitler nor his father, which persist in repeating the "Leopold Frankenberger" myth. Makes you wonder (((who))) is controlling the content on Wikikepedia.
2010-08-17, 22:00
Updated on: 20-01-2021, 16:29
Journalist Jean-Paul Mulders has been studying the DNA of Adolf Hitler since 2008. He came up with startling discoveries.

Jean-Paul Mulders came into possession of Adolf Hitler's Y chromosome in 2008 when he wanted to uncover the truth about another persistent myth: that Hitler fathered a son with a young Frenchwoman during the First World War. This story went around the world in the 1970s and then made the international press. After the initial hoopla, it died a quiet death, as no one could confirm or disprove it. It lingered in the gray zone between fable and history, where it became the subject of discussion on Internet forums.

In the book The Youth of Adolf Hitler by Marc Vermeeren, the idea was put forward to solve this mystery of the alleged son of Hitler once and for all by means of DNA research. Vermeeren had already done the necessary fieldwork in Austria. By sifting through parish registers for weeks, he had found men who were related to Hitler in the paternal line. Despite their slightly different surnames (Hüttler, Hiedler, etc.), the records clearly showed that they had a common ancestor with Adolf Hitler.

Mulders went to the Austrian Waldviertel and was able to trace ten of those Hitler relatives there. One of them voluntarily allowed a saliva test, from another we obtained some DNA from cigarette butts he had left in an ashtray. Then the trip went to the United States, where three great-nephews of Adolf Hitler live on Long Island under the pseudonym Stuart-Houston. They are extremely media shy and don't even open the front door. Mulders had to observe one of them for a week before he could get his hands on a napkin that the man threw from the car when leaving a roadhouse. Contrary to expectations, the imprint of his lips (with chicken fat) contained a perfectly usable DNA profile.

On analysis, the Y chromosome of the American Hitler turned out to be identical to that of the two Austrian ones. This proved that they are probably related to each other. Mulders knew that he now also had the Y chromosome of Adolf Hitler himself. After all, any geneticist will confirm that the Y chromosome is passed on unchanged from father to son, and only mutates slightly every now and then. Anyone who has the same close ancestor in the male line, such as Adolf Hitler and his second cousins on Long Island or in the Waldviertel, therefore inevitably also has the same Y chromosome.

The envelope, please
The next step was to get hold of the DNA of Jean-Marie Loret, Hitler's alleged son. That was successful when Mulders was able to get his hands on letters he had written in the 1970s. The backs of the stamps were found to contain enough saliva to be analyzed. The DNA of the stamps was compared with that of the saliva of the Hitler relatives from Austria and the United States. No fewer than eight of the seventeen markers showed an abnormal value. As a result, the Frenchman Jean-Marie Loret, who since the 1970s impersonated Hitler's son, definitely fell through the cracks. He turned out not to be related to Hitler.

With the same research, Mulders was able to show that Aloïs Hitler, Adolf's father, was not a bastard child, but indeed a real Hitler. The story about an alleged Jewish grandfather of Hitler, which had been circulating since the 1930s and had led to the most insane conspiracy theories, could therefore also be referred to the realm of fables.

All this appeared as a four-part report in the newspaper Het Laatste Nieuws. The news was picked up by El Mundo and the Daily Mail, by Hürriyet and the Croatian Times, and attracted the attention of Chinese web sites, Russian television channels NTV and Zvezda, and radio stations from New Zealand.

The DNA material that served to unmask Hitler's false son now serves to determine Adolf Hitler's genetic lineage.

You can respond to this article by sending an e-mail to [email protected]. Your response may then be included in the next issue.
Translated from

Hitler commissioned two genealogists, first Friedrich von Frank (in Febuary 1932) and then Rudolf Koppensteiner (who published the book Die Ahnentafel des Fuehrers in 1937), to create a family tree tracing back 8 generations, with Johann Georg Hiedler named as his paternal grandfather. Their work confirmed he had zero non-Aryan ancestors in that period.
Last edited:
#2 "Hitler was homosexual and celibate"

This sensationalist claim was put forth by a literal kike, Lothar Machtan, and was roundly rejected by all serious Third Reich historians from both the mainstream and revisionist schools when published; not just David Irving but also William Shirer, John Toland, Anton Joachimsthaler, Brigite Hamann, and Ian Kershaw who is as mainstream as one could get. Yet despite being contradicted by testimony from every surviving member of Hitler's inner circle and rejected by Hitler scholars, these Jew-originated yarns about Hitler's homosexuality and celibacy with women are endlessly repeated in newspapers who love to cite Machtan as their "historian" source. Machtan's thesis that Hitler's warmongering had a direct causal link with (alleged) homosexuality was not appreciated by gay advocates either.

The only "source" for Hitler's alleged homosexual behaviour in WW1 is the so-called "Mend Protocol" (Mend-Protokoll*), a document of dubious authenticity and provenance -- it's supposed to have been created in Germany on December 22, 1939 but first appeared in England after WW2 ended. Moreover, the author of the Mend Protocol isn't even Hans Mend, Hitler's WW1 comrade-in-arms in the List Regiment and the alleged eyewitness of Hitler's homosexuality, but one German Resistance cuck, Friedrich Alfred Schmid Noerr, who claims to have written the document after conducting an "exhaustive interrogation" of Mend in 1939. The account contained so many factual errors about the military situation of the List Regiment that it's either a forgery and the "interrogation" never happened, or they did talk but Mend was a completely unscrupulous bullshitter--these are the positions of John F. Williams and Thomas Weber respectively, two English scholars who studied Hitler's WW1 service.

Hans Mend did write an exaggeratedly positive book about Hitler's WW1 service in 1930, titled Hitler im Felde, 1914-1918, that made up an anecdote about Hitler disobeying his Jewish superior officer (to bolster Hitler's anti-Semitic cred) but contained accurate information about the WW1 military, with none of the errors found in the Mend-Protokoll, so the evidence points to forgery. Mend fell out with Hitler and the NSDAP in 1932 and wracked up an extensive criminal record as an sex offender before dying in prison in 1942.

*The full title and location of the Mend-Protokoll manuscript: "Protokoll aufgenommen am 22. Dezember 1939 mit Hans Mend, Reitlehrer und Verwalter auf Schloss Eltzholz Berg bei Starnberg a/See, ehemals Ulan im kgl. bayer. x. Ulanenregiment zugeteilt als Ordonnanzreiter im Oktober 1914 dem Inf. Rgt. ‘List.’ Seit Juni 1916 befördert zum Offizier-Stellvertreter und zugeteilt dem 4. bayer. Feldartillerieregiment, Munitionskolonne 143 (Tankabwehr). Bei der Truppe bekannt als der ‚Schimmelreiter‘," Bayerisches Hauptstaatsarchiv/Abteilung IV Kriegsarchiv, Handschriftensammlung Nummer 3231.

John Frank Williams (2005). Chapter 9: Hugo Gutmann And the Good Soldier Mend. Corporal Hitler and the Great War 1914-1918: The List Regiment. pp132-134
SmartSelect 20230514 015015 Gallery

SmartSelect 20230514 021659 Gallery

SmartSelect 20230514 025737 Gallery

Thomas Weber. (2010). Chapter 13: Hitler's Second War 1939-1945. Hitler's First War: Adolf Hitler, the Men of the List Regiment, and the First World War. p320
SmartSelect 20230514 023504 Gallery

Provenance issues of the "Mend Protocol", pointed out by Charles Kaiser in the LGBT magazine, The Advocate, Issue #851, 20, Nov 2001. Rainbow fags aren't exactly enthusiastic about the prospect of Hitler being a sex deviant like them.
SmartSelect 20230514 033544 Gallery

SmartSelect 20230514 032550 Gallery

SmartSelect 20230514 033629 Gallery

All the credible "dirt" on Hitler, by those in his inner circle, is of the exact opposite nature, that between 1919-1933 he indulged excessively in non-marital sexual relations with women, including his half-niece, other teenage girls and other guys' wives (in fairness, they were chasing Hitler, not the other way around.)
See Hermann Esser, "Neuer Tatsachenbericht: Der große Liebhaber Adolf Hitler" in Revue Die Welt Illustrierte nr. 31, 11 September 1949.
Half of it can be read at

1921 July: Hitler's opponents within the NSDAP compose and publish an anonymous pamphlet with a print run of 3,000 copies, titled "Adolf Hitler: Is He A Traitor", republished in The Muenchener Post newspaper.
In the leaflet which was drawn up by the dissident members of the Committee in July, 1921, this was one of the principal points of accusation against Hitler: 'If any member asks him how he lives and what was his former profession, he always becomes angry and excited. Up to now no answer has been supplied to these questions. So his conscience cannot be clear, especially as his excessive intercourse with ladies, to whom he often describes himself as the King of Munich, costs a great deal of money.' "
William L. Shirer. (1960). Chapter 2. "Birth of the Nazi Party." The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany.

1927 March-July: Hitler pumped and dumped a 17 year old girl in 1927; his opponents within the NSDAP found out about the affair (which wasn't illegal, but "ruining young girls for marriage" was considered immoral enough to be majorly scandalous) and attempted to blackmail him, unsuccessfully, because Hitler persuaded the girl to commit perjury and sign a sworn statement stating they were only friends.
Dr. Ida Arnold had been writing anonymous letters to the Nazi Party HQ, claiming she had personal knowledge that Hitler was “seducing young girls in Berchtesgaden.” Hitler told Helh that over 8 such letters had been received and he could not afford any political scandal. He told Hehl, “I love Mimi with my whole heart, please tell her this, but I have to remain distant from her for awhile.”

Mimi had to sign a sworn statement that she and Hitler were merely “friends." On May 10, 1930, Mimi Reiter married an Austrian hotel owner in Innsbruck. She admitted she "did not love him, but I was lonely.”

Mimi remembered, “In 1928 and 1929 Wolf wrote me some more letters and cards [all of which still exist]. He sent me a beautiful wedding present and a silver goblet with his engraved name on it. I still loved him passionately and my marriage was unhappy from the start.”

Then the death of Hitler’s niece, Geli Raubal, changed everything for both Hitler and for Mimi Reiter. Geli Raubal died on September 19, 1931. In early October, 1931, a man that Mimi recognized was standing in front of her at the hotel she ran in Innsbruck.

“My name is Hess,” the man with the prominent eyebrows told her. “Herr Hitler sent me. He wants to know if you are happy.”

Mimi looked at him and said immediately, “No!” Hess asked her what message he should convey to Hitler.

Mimi said, “Tell him that I am extremely happy that he sent you to ask me this question. Tell him that I would love to see him again.”

Mimi remembers: “My heart was in my throat when Hess drove away. He had handed me Hitler’s private telephone number to his apartment. Naturally this stirred up all my old memories of Wolf. My husband and I were already separated and our marriage had been very short and miserably unhappy. All I wanted at that moment was to see Wolf again.”
Gunter Peis. “Hitlers unbekannte Geliebte: Ein Bericht von Gunter Peis,” in Stern nr. 24, 13 June 1959, pp. 28-34.
The above is quoted from a slightly abridged English translation:

Interviews with Albert Speer, Eva Braun's surviving sisters Ilse and Gretl, Hitler's housekeeper Anni Winter, his bodyguard Heinz Linge and the memoirs of his secretary Christa Schroeder all testify to his heterosexuality and conventional sex life.

Turkish-American journalist Nerin E. Gun, who interviewed Eva Braun's sister Gretl as research for his book Eva Braun: Hitler's Mistress (Meredith Press, 1968), includes Gretl's comment that "Hitler was not timid in sex" and was fanatically adored by women (pp.67-69)
Hitler and women
Two suicide attempts within 14 months. Two women in their first youth who wished to kill themselves for this man [Hitler] or because of this man . And these were not the only ones so deeply affected by Hitler. The famous surgeon Prof. Ferdinand Sauerbruch described how some of his women patients invoked Hitler's name before submitting to an operation. I have heard that mothers breathed "Heil Hitler" immediately after giving birth and insisted that the baby be shown a portrait of the Führer. Other women are said to have murmured "Heil Hitler" at the peak of sexual satisfaction, and this I can well believe. Did not Balzac tell of the wife who used to cross herself before yielding to her husband's embraces? In my student days, I knew a girl who used to hide a photograph of Hitler under the sheets while she made love, and I remember another who had a swastika tattooed on her navel. Hitler's chauffeur Maurice told me that very often girls in their teens threw themselves under his car in the hope of getting injured and being subsequently comforted by him. Others presented themselves at Berchtesgaden, often almost naked under their light coats or their BDM (young Nazi girls) uniforms, bent on offering their virginity to the Führer. Others tore open the front of their blouses when he passed. Some women seriously proposed reestablishing the droit du seigneur at the time of their marriage. And then, of course, there were the mountains of love letters that Hitler received constantly, the erotic gifts, some of which were in extremely bad taste, and above all, the embroidered cushions that were continually arriving at the Berghof.

How can such fascination for this man be explained, especially since Hitler had not yet acquired the exalted position of Chancellor of the Reich and was being ridiculed, insulted, and vilified in the German press, and at times even tracked down as a criminal by the government police? Physically he was not attractive. He was no John F. Kennedy in looks. He was often badly dressed and it seems strange that a woman should let herself be addressed by a man who brandished a whip made of hippopotamus skin (or was it the tail?) and who was always accompanied by a bodyguard of two armed bullies when he invited a lady to his table in the Grössenwahn in Schwabing.

However, in private Hitler did not have the manners of a Räuberhauptmann or gang leader, as his enemies affirmed and as Bertold Brecht characterized him in a widely diffused satire. He was in fact extremely gallant with women, always gave them precedence, never sat down in their presence, bowed to them with nineteenth-century deference, and kissed their hands on the slightest pretext. His voice changed in their presence, its gutturalness being replaced by a mellifluous quality . He spoke to them with the warmth that characterizes Austrians, with the faint accent and vocabulary of a bon vivant that impress the Prussians so much. Every woman to whom he spoke was convinced that he placed her, and her alone, on a pedestal and that the Führer's exclusive aim was to please her. Many women, on finding themselves confronted by this charmer instead of by the churlish character they had expected, were filled at first with speechless amazement and then with intense delight.

Undoubtedly he had a mysterious hypnotic power which acted upon all those who approached him , whether generals, diplomats, politicians , children encountered in the street , or servants." I felt myself melt in his presence," Ilse Braun [older sister of Eva Hitler] says. "I would have done anything for him," affirms his secretary Traudl Junge. Yet today, both find him grotesque . All his secretaries declare that he never reproved them, was always patient and readily dictated a phrase again if they had not understood it immediately. He always called them "my child" or "my beauty" and never started the day without complimenting them on their dresses or hairstyles. He took a kindly interest in their private lives and often spoke to them like a father.

He claimed to be uninfluenced by women . "No woman has ever ventured to give me political advice," he boasted. He also said on one occasion "A woman's strategy consists in being very good at first, in order to capture the man's confidence, then in pulling on the reins, and finally in grasping these reins so firmly that the man has to dance according to her desires."

He affected a timidity that women attributed to his his inexperience or rather to his periods of inactivity in the field of love. In reality "Hitler was not timid in sex," according to Eva's [younger] sister Gretl Braun , who must have good grounds for saying this and for adding , " Still waters run deep . "
Last edited:
#3 "Hitler was into occult shit"

Adolf Hitler believed that the Universe was governed by observable, discoverable and quantifiable natural laws. He did not believe in “hidden masters” or invisible spirits or any other such incredible things.

The best examination of the alleged links between National Socialist Germany and the paranormal is Nicholas Goodrick-Clark’s book, The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and their Influence on Nazi Ideology; The Ariosophists of Austria and Germany, 1890-1935 (New York University Press, NY, 1985, ISBN 0-8147-3054-X). Regarding the Thule Society, he concludes that although Dietrich Eckart had attended occasional meetings as a guest,

…there is no evidence that Hitler ever attended the Thule Society…Johannes Hering’s diary of Society meetings mentioned the presence of other Nazi leaders between 1920 and 1923, but not Hitler himself. Once Hitler was in firm control of the DAP, the party’s chief attribute was anti-Semitic oratory at public meetings and street activism, while any völkisch-cultural interest was relegated to the preserve of back-room enthusiasts.

…[D]escriptions of a prehistoric golden age, a gnostic priesthood, and a secret heritage in cultural relics and orders had no part in his political or cultural imagination. These ideas, of course, were widespread in the völkisch movement, but Hitler’s achievement was the transformation of this nationalist feeling and nostalgia into a violently [sic] anti-Semitic movement concerned with national revolution and revival. (pp. 201-202).
Goodrick-Clarke goes on to mention that Heinrich Himmler had an interest in the occult, to the degree that it related to Germanic prehistory. But as far as we know right now, Himmler never let his personal interest in the occult interfere with his running the Schutzstaffel. Indeed, one of the bastions of anti-occult sentiment in the National Socialist state was in the Sicherheitsdeinst, led by Reinhard Heydrich. The SD classified the occult as a weltanschauliche Gegner (“ideological enemy”).

It was reported that Rudolf Hess had consulted an astrologer concerning his ill-fated flight to Great Britain on May 10, 1941. In response, on June 9 the SD launched a comprehensive “Campaign against Occult Practices and So-Called Occult Sciences (Aktion gegen Geheimlehrenund sogenannte Geheimwissenschaften). As a result, public advocacy of the occult was banned in Germany until the Allies set up a puppet regime following the catastrophic defeat of 1945.

The “Occult” Nonsense About National Socialist Germany​


A whole genre of this nonsense has been fostered by the publishing industry.
by William Grimstad
(A review of The Occult Roots of Nazism, by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke)
ALTHOUGH THE gas chamber mythos has been the center-piece of ongoing Establishment efforts to diabolize the Third Reich, there has been a parallel attempt to remove that epoch from objective consideration by casting it in a less homicidal but more bizarrely demoniacal light. Linking National Socialism to occultism has served several purposes: making the Hitler period look spooky, or at least a bit “kooky”; alienating people of traditional religious outlook, and not least, cashing in on the lucrative bookselling fad of recent years sometimes called the “occult explosion.”
Such books as The Morning of the Magicians or The Occult and the Third Reich first broached the notion that the National Socialist era, in addition to its multifarious other evils, had actually been conjured up by wicked wirepullers behind the visible leaders. We were introduced to the enigmatic figures of Rudolf von Sebottendorf and other supposed adepts of the fabled Thule Society, which now have become household words among even casual students of the period; and behind them an earlier strain of philosophers who, shockingly enough, had erected a religious worldview upon Aryan racialism.
Conveniently, the German regime’s avowed pro-Aryan policies now could be faulted not only as leading to the Holocaust. They also became the butt of ridicule for travestying science or of opprobrium for trying to harness powers of evil. Still better, the always awkward fact of broad electoral support for the National Socialist program in one of the world’s most advanced countries likewise could be explained: an entire nation had been mesmerized by baleful cultic Svengalis.
Goodrick-Clarke’s book was published several years ago in England, but has begun finding its way into the book trade here. As it represents a substantial research effort, one naturally wonders about the author’s inclinations. Little biographical information is furnished, but the acknowledgments do contain a couple of names of interest. The first one thanked is Ellic Howe, a leading personality within the United Grand Lodge of England, reputedly the world’s predominant Masonic organization. Howe writes frequently in Ars Quatuor Coronatorum, the controlled circulation research journal of the lodge, whose enmity to National Socialism is glaring.
The author next salutes Norman Cohn, the British Holocaustorian who has made a career of microscopically analyzing the sensational Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as a literary impetus for the later Holocaust. On the strength of such thinly veiled pro-Zionist essays as his Warrant for Genocide, Cohn worked his way to the top of the historical hierarchy at Oxford, and there supervised Goodrick-Clarke’s studies, where the present volume began as a Ph.D. thesis.
Revisionists may raise eyebrows at such auspices, but my impression is that Goodrick-Clarke generally avoids the tendentiousness of his mentors. Although marred by annoying knee-jerks and tics of minor residual bias, this remains a thorough and levelheaded inquiry into a topic severely mauled by hacks. It also offers, for the first time known to me in English, a window into the amazingly extensive and frankly quite fascinating German nationalist literature of the period.
His subtitle, “The Ariosophists of Austria and Germany, 1890-1935,” refers to a body of ideas which once had a substantial following in the German-speaking world. The ideas centered on the writings of two Austrians, Guido von List (1848-1919) and Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels (1874-1954). Ariosophy is used by the author as a generic for this “lore of the Aryans” that was expounded by the two men.
Guido von List (the aristocratic von was self-assumed) was raised a Catholic but early took interest in Nordic paganism, which he coupled with a profound attraction to nature. An ardent rebel against modernity, which he associated with the spreading metropolis of fin-de-siècle Vienna and all its decadent ways, List’s happiest moments came on rambles through the Austrian countryside, and he began his literary career with newspaper pieces on the rural scene, depicted as highly spiritualized. He was concerned to furnish an ideological backdrop to the pan-German movement led by such nationalist politicians as Georg von Schoenerer and Vienna Mayor Karl Lueger.
Later, List worked out what was essentially a clairvoyant reconstruction of the distant past, elaborating a vast mythology of an ancient Wotanist priesthood, the Armanenschaft. They supposedly held sway in Europe until the Christian conversion, but now were confined to clandestine status, perpetuating the ancient Aryan lore through a small élite, among whom he numbered himself.
Eventually, List built up a fairly wide readership and a Guido von List Society, sponsored by prestigious people, was established. With the coming of the First World War, the appeal of such a philosophy grew greatly, especially in Germany, and List also found a wider field for analysis of the destructive elements arrayed against the Central Powers. He dubbed these the Great International Party, in a fair anticipation of the World Zionist Organizations and Trilateral Commissions of our own day.
Adolf Josef Lanz also was born in Vienna, of middle-class Catholic parents. Like List, he assumed an aristocratic pedigree and the pompous Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels moniker, although his claim to this title was never disproven. He was inspired by List and became one of the older guru’s early backers, but Lanz’s Ariosophical interests were different. As a young man he had entered a Cistercian abbey as a novice monk, and although he left after a time, he remained enthralled by medieval Catholicism.
Lanz was disinterested in Listian oracular recreations of the German past, but he did have his own candidate for an ancient Aryan secret priesthood that supposedly had survivors in the modern era: the Knights Templar, a Catholic order suppressed for heresy in the 1300s. He founded his Ordo Novi Templi (Order of the New Temple) around 1907 in the medieval castle of Burg Werfenstein, which perched dramatically above the Danube with a swastika and fleur-de-lis flag over its tower. Goodrick-Clarke is much perturbed at the racialist slant of this literature. Actually, such material was commonplace in many Western countries at that time: imperial Britain had its “white man’s burden” ethic purveyed to a huge audience by poet Rudyard Kipling; and here in America, anthropologist Lothrop Stoddard could publish a best-selling book entitled The Rising Tide of Color.
As the author’s exhaustive analysis, if not his own conclusions, makes clear, however, Ariosophy played only a very incidental role in the rise of National Socialism. Although Hitler may have known of List, there is no proof of it, and only an indication that he had read Lanz’s Ostara magazine as a young man. He was not impressed, to judge by his ridicule of “völkisch wandering scholars” and antiquarian cultists in Mein Kampf.
Of far greater import in the political arena was Baron Rudolf von Sebottendorf von der Rose (born Adam Alfred Rudolf Glauer in 1875), although his role too has been distorted. Goodrick-Clarke has done an excellent job of analyzing the available material on this colorful international adventurer. Once again, however, Sebottendorf’s involvement with Freemasonry, Muslim dervishes and the Turkish revolution cannot be convincingly tied to his pan-Germanism, except that they may have predisposed him to backstage activism. What he does deserve credit for is having the political savvy, virtually alone among a welter of confused nationalists and anti-Communists in southern Bavaria, to see what was needed in Germany and the conviction to stake his personal resources on that.
After joining the moribund Germanenorden in 1916, Sebottendorf quickly revived the Bavarian section and began using the nominal cultural society as a center for political action during the brewing Marxist revolution, adopting the Thule Society name as a “cover” to divert Red suspicions. He purchased the Beobachter newspaper (later the National Socialists’ Völkischer Beobachter ); stockpiled weapons; schemed to kidnap the Communist leader, Kurt Eisner; infiltrated spies into the Communist cadres, and organized the Kampfbund Thule paramilitary group which joined with other Free Corps units in the successful attack on Munich’s Communist government on April 30, 1919.
Most important, of course, was Sebottendorf’s recognition of the need for a new type of worker-based party to deal with the unprecedented Red threat. He founded the German Workers Union in 1918, the most active member of which was Anton Drexler, who went on to start the German Workers Party, which was joined, taken over, and renamed the National Socialist German Workers’ Party by Adolf Hitler in 1919.
Meanwhile, Sebottendorf’s political career ended abruptly that same year, when Communists seized seven Thule Society members and executed them on April 30, triggering international outrage and at last galvanizing the Munich citizenry into ousting the Marxists. Sebottendorf was blamed for having allowed the Thule membership list to fall into the Reds’ hands, although there were those who suggested that this was his Machiavellian intent all along, as the ensuing creation of martyrs played a key role in the nationalist victory.
In any case, Rudolf von Sebottendorf was in no way a puppet-master of the much later Third Reich, which indeed treated him with some hostility. Rather, he was an unusually shrewd political operative at a critical formative period, whose personal courage kept him battling in Red Munich long after many others had retreated. One wonders exactly what situation would have awaited the inexperienced Hitler had Sebottendorf not laid this groundwork.
* * *
Anyone trying to arrive at a rational understanding of this important period has been painfully aware of the jabberwock literature that has held the floor since the Second World War, ranging from popular novels through journalistic exposes to solemn histories, and treating of everything from “Holocaust studies” through postwar “Nazi war criminal” skullduggeries.
Although it may seem extreme to link a Lucy Dawidowicz with the latest Hitler-is-alive tabloid tale, the fact is that they are on a continuum of literature which enforces a Manichean, total-evil view of the National Socialist era, from the academic down to the comic-book levels, a peculiar situation that does not exist in any other known area of inquiry.
Moreover, it is not that the literary establishment simply neglects to repudiate this trashier output. In fact, it has actively promoted it. The books in question are published by major houses, and get conventional review and promotional attention. Such a state of affairs would never exist in regard to sensationalized titles critical of Israeli Zionism, for example. Clearly, then, a Revisionist laying to rest of this material is long overdue; the present book, despite its lacks, is a start.
Goodrick-Clarke traces the origin of the Lovecraftian school of Third Reich historiography to the self-proclaimed German rocket engineer, Willy Ley, who emigrated here in 1935 and spent the ensuing years working on Hollywood science fiction films. In 1947, Ley wrote an article for a “pulp” fantasy magazine ridiculing pseudoscience in Germany, which he claimed included a Berlin sect attempting to conjure up the mysterious vril force described by British novelist Edward Bulwer-Lytton in his The Coming Race (1871), supposedly conveying to its adepts total power over the world.
This was sufficient to spark off, in 1960, the first and probably most enduring of the genre, The Morning of the Magicians by French journalists Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier. A vast farrago of misquotations, sheer fabrications and exclamation points, this opus touched base on the major points that were to become standard for the type:
  • The rise and early success of National Socialism were due, not to sober choice by the German electorate, followed by hard work of a capable people, but to supernatural forces;
  • The forces are described as either discarnate, like Bulwer’s vril , or as the doings of godlike “ascended masters” in some remote and exotic location, usually Tibet;
  • It is possible to get into contact with this power, identified by Pauwels and Bergier as “the Master of the World or the King of Fear,” and as it were plug in on the current for one’s own ends in the mundane world;
  • Such liaison was a top-priority project of the German government, despite its other distractions;
  • The government’s channel was the Thule Society, which in turn was the creature of the two evil geniuses, the playwright and early Hitler friend, Dietrich Eckart, and a professor of geopolitics at the University of Munich, Dr. Karl Haushofer. They used the Thule Society to control the state through Hitler, who is invariably described in the canon as a semi-hysterical “mediumistic” personality.
Later savants, such as Dietrich Bronder in his Before Hitler Came (1964), with its title rather crassly lifted from Sebottendorf’s 1933 memoir, introduced the Ariosophical dimension of List and Lanz, including the pair in the Thule clique, along with Hitler, Mussolini, Goering and a who’s who of Axis luminaries. With this, the menu was complete and numerous others could begin rehashing it, most notably Michel-Jean Angebert, The Occult and the Third Reich (1971); Trevor Ravenscroft, The Spear of Destiny (1972), and J.H. Brennan, Occult Reich (1974).
Placing his magnifying glass on the “MOM” genre, Goodrick-Clarke reports as follows:
  • There was no Vril Society or “Luminous Lodge,” as the fabulists call it, although there was a “Lumenclub” in Vienna for some years after 1932, acting as a front for the banned National Socialist Party;
  • Prof. Haushofer did endorse a thrust to the east, into Soviet territory, but strictly for obvious geopolitical reasons; his alleged goal of reaching the ascended masters in the Orient is “entirely false;” according to Goodrick-Clarke;
  • Dietrich Eckart (who died in 1923), along with the young Alfred Rosenberg, attended a few early Thule meetings as guests but there is no evidence linking other Party leaders, or List, Lanz or Haushofer, with the group;
  • The Thule Society was disbanded around 1925 because of declining membership and was never reorganized.
We certainly owe something to Goodrick-Clarke for so expertly skewering this pernicious nonsense, which has even tripped up major-league historians like Joachim Fest, although he does not follow through on the truly important question. The inimitable Holocaust, spotlighted by all these “schlock” authors as the result of the national demonic possession, still sits enshrined in its increasingly shopworn hideousness, even here.
* * *
Source: Journal of Historical Review, 1991, via CODOH
So which ethnic groups did the Nazis actually hate?
1) Juden
2) Negroes
3) Slawischen were despised as an inferior people by Hitler and most Nazis, but were never classified as non-Aryan. However, the "Slawisch-Asiatischen" Soviets were non-Aryan because they had Asiatic blood which disqualified one for consideration as Aryan.
Per the SS Ahnenpaß guidelines, a citizen of a Slavic nation (e.g. a Czech or Pole) is considered as a racial Aryan, as long as his direct family line contained no intermarriage with Juden, gypsies, Africans, Asiatics, indigenous Australians (Aboriginals) or Native Americans for at least 5 generations (32 direct relatives) back. It is remarkable that the Ahnenpass did not name Slavic (Slawischen) ancestry as a disqualifier for being Aryan.
1472522674152 1

Der Rassegrundsatz.
Die im nationalsozialistischen Denken verwurzelte Auffassung, daß es oberste Pflicht eines Volkes ist, seine Rasse, sein Blut von fremden Einflüssen rein zu halten und die in den Volkskörper eingedrungenen fremden Blutseinschläge wieder auszumerzen, gründet sich auf die wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse der Erblehre und Rassenforschung. Dem Denken des Nationalsozialismus entsprechend, jedem anderen Volke volle Gerechtigkeit widerfahren zu lassen, ist dabei niemals von höher- oder minderwertigem, sondern stets nur von fremden Rasseneinschlägen die Rede.

Der Begriff der arischen Abstammung.
Da nach den Ergebnissen der Rasselehre das deutsche Volk neben dem bestimmenden Einfluss der nordischen Rasse auch in geringerem und rechnungsmäßig nicht erfaßbarem Umfange andere mehr oder minder verwandte Rassenbestandteile enthält, die auch die Bausteine der europäischen Nachbarvölker sind, hat man für diesen übergeordneten Begriff der Gesamtheit der im deutschen Volke enthaltenen Rassen die Bezeichnung arisch (abweichend von der Sprachwissenschaft!) gewählt und damit das deutsche und das diesem eng verwandte Blut zu einer rassischen Einheit zusammen/gefasst. Genau den gleichen Umfang hat der Begriff „deutsches oder artverwandtes Blut“ im Reichsbürgergesetz.

Arischer Abstammung (= „deutschblütig“) ist demnach derjenige Mensch, der frei von einem, vom deutschen Volke aus gesehen, fremdrassigen Blutseinschlage ist. Als fremd gilt hier vor allem das Blut der auch im europäischen Siedlungsraume lebenden Juden und Zigeuner, das der asiatischen und afrikanischen Rassen und der Ureinwohner Australiens und Amerikas (Indianer), während zum Beispiel ein Engländer oder Schwede, ein Franzose oder Tscheche, ein Pole oder Italiener, wenn er selbst frei von solchen, auch ihm fremden Blutseinschlägen ist, als verwandt, also als arisch gelten muss, mag er nun in seiner Heimat, in Ostasien oder Amerika wohnen oder mag er Bürger der United States of America oder eines südamerikanischen Freistaats sein. Dass uns dabei zum Beispiel für eine Eheschließung der deutsche Volksgenosse, das Mädchen rein deutscher Abstammung nähersteht als ein anderer Arier entfernterer Rasseverwandtschaft, ist selbstverständlich.

In jedem Fall ist es Pflicht und Aufgabedes Einzelnen, den Nachweis seiner arischen Abstammung entsprechend den für ihn geltenden Bestimmungen zu führen, in vielen Fällen auch hinsichtlich des Ehegatten.

File:Ahnenpass 003 anonym.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

The Racial Principle.
The view, rooted in National Socialist thinking, that it is the supreme duty of a people to keep its race and blood clean from foreign influences and to eradicate the foreign blood strains that have penetrated the national body, is based on the scientific knowledge of genetics and racial research. In accordance with the thinking of National Socialism, to allow every other people full justice, there is never talk of superior or inferior races, but always only of foreign breeds.

The concept of Aryan descent.
Since, according to the results of racial theory, the German people, in addition to the determining influence of the Nordic race, also contains other more or less related racial components to a lesser extent that cannot be calculated, which are also the building blocks of the neighboring European peoples, one has to use this overriding concept of the totality of the races contained in the German people chose the designation Aryan (deviating from linguistics!) and thus the German and the blood closely related to it were combined/combined into a racial unit. The term "German or related blood" in the Reich Citizenship Act has exactly the same scope.

Aryan descent (= "German-blooded") is therefore a person who, from the point of view of the German people, is free of a foreign blood strain. The blood of the Jews and Gypsies who also live in the European settlement area, that of the Asian and African races and the natives of Australia and America (Indians) is considered foreign here, while for example an Englishman or Swede, a Frenchman or Czech, a Pole or Italian, if he himself is free from such blood stains, which are also foreign to him, must be regarded as related, i.e. as Aryan, whether he lives in his homeland, in East Asia or America or whether he is a citizen of the United States of America or a South American free state . It goes without saying that, for example, when it comes to marriage, a German national, a girl of purely German descent, is closer to us than another Aryan who is more distantly related.

In any case, it is the duty and task of the individual to provide proof of his Aryan descent in accordance with the regulations applicable to him, in many cases also with regard to the spouse.
In the NSDAP-approved Der Volks-Brockhaus, a single-volume general reference encyclopedia updated yearly, Aryans are considered to be "members of the races that have been native to Europe for a long time (Nordic, Faelian, Dinaric, Western, Eastern, Eastern Baltic), especially in contrast to the Near Eastern and Oriental races." [„die Angehörigen der seit langer Zeit in Europa einheimischen Rassen (nordisch, fälisch, dinarisch, westisch, ostisch, ostbaltisch) besonders im Gegensatz zur vorderasiatischen und orientalischen Rasse.
When I type "Jean Paul Mulders saliva test" into google, I get completely different results from yours, every article claims that Hitler had Jewish and African(!) ancestors, here's an example article.
These rumours have been conclusively disproven by DNA testing.
These articles use the exact same argument to prove he actually had mixed roots.
I can't find anything else on this subject but to me personally this entire 'test' looks like a made up thing just for clicks.
When I type "Jean Paul Mulders saliva test" into google, I get completely different results from yours, every article claims that Hitler had Jewish and African(!) ancestors, here's an example article.

These articles use the exact same argument to prove he actually had mixed roots.
I can't find anything else on this subject but to me personally this entire 'test' looks like a made up thing just for clicks.
>In 2010 Belgian journalist Jean-Paul Mulders insinuated that Adolf Hitler had some Negro ancestry based on the fact that he carried a Y-chromosome that is also carried by some people in Africa. So as not to defeat his own propaganda, Mulders omitted to mention that the same Y-chromosome has a substantial presence in Europe, especially in the Balkans. The deception consisted in pretending that White DNA found in both Europe and Africa was really Negro DNA that somehow made its way into Europe (magically, without bringing any observable Negroid characteristics with it).
Don't forget that Jews are so obsessed with sex Anne Frank claimed that Hitler had only one testicle.
Jews are so obsessed with sex Anne Frank wrote about her vagina, masturbating and lesbian tendencies when she was all of 14 years old.
Vaginal Description: Friday, March 24, 1944. Second half
I’d like to ask Peter whether he knows what girls look like down there. I don’t think boys are as complicated as girls. You can easily see what boys look like in photographs or pictures of male nudes, but with women it’s different. In women, the genitals, or whatever they’re called, are hidden between their legs. Peter has probably never seen a girl up close. To tell you the truth, neither have I. Boys are a lot easier. How on earth would I go about describing a girl’s parts? I can tell from what he said that he doesn’t know exactly how it all fits together. He was talking about the “Muttermund,” [* cervix], but that’s on the inside, where you can’t see it. Everything’s pretty well arranged in us women. Until I was eleven or twelve, I didn’t realize there was a second set of labia on the inside, since you couldn’t see them. What’s even funnier is that I thought urine came out of the clitoris. I asked Mother one time what that little bump was, and she said she didn’t know. She can really play dumb when she wants to!

But to get back to the subject. How on earth can you explain what it all looks like without any models? Shall I try anyway? Okay, here goes!

When you’re standing up, all you see from the front is hair. Between your legs there are two soft, cushiony things, also covered with hair, which press together when you’re standing, so you can’t see what’s inside. They separate when you sit down, and they’re very red and quite fleshy on the inside. In the upper part, between the outer labia, there’s a fold of skin that, on second thought, looks like a kind of blister. That’s the clitoris. Then come the inner labia, which are also pressed together in a kind of crease. When they open up, you can see a fleshy little mound, no bigger than the top of my thumb. The upper part has a couple of small holes in it, which is where the urine comes out. The lower part looks as if it were just skin, and yet that’s where the vagina is. You can barely find it, because the folds of skin hide the opening. The hole’s so small I can hardly imagine how a man could get in there, much less how a baby could come out. It’s hard enough trying to get your index finger inside. That’s all there is, and yet it plays such an important role!

Yours, Anne M. Frank

Erotic Feelings Towards a Girl: Thursday, January 6, 1944

Unconsciously, I had these feelings even before I came here. Once when I was spending the night at Jacque’s, I could no longer restrain my curiosity about her body, which she’d always hidden from me and which I’d never seen. I asked her whether, as proof of our friendship, we could touch each other’s breasts. Jacque refused.

I also had a terrible desire to kiss her, which I did. Every time I see a female nude, such as the Venus in my art history book, I go into ecstasy. Sometimes I find them so exquisite I have to struggle to hold back my tears. If only I had a girlfriend!
what about nazi male body worship and nudism (a.k.a faggotism)?

also literal state mandated forced cuckery like lebensborn?

and nazi sex orgy

it seems like nazis were completely ok with all sorts of degenerate shit as long as they were done by the whites

#3 "Hitler was into occult shit"
but hitler was an anti-christian though

after judaism, his next target was christianity (christianity is an offshoot of judaism anyway, so makes sense, because Jesus was a jew himself?)
Last edited:
what about nazi male body worship and nudism (a.k.a faggotism)?
State support for nudism was limited to allowing nude swimming for health reasons. The Nazis didn't support homosexuality or exhibitionism and the Spiegel article you linked doesn't claim that they did.
>>"We want a strong and joyful affirmation of body awareness, because we need it to build a strong and self-confident race." Nudity was seen partly as a means of encouraging the "health of the race."
>The greatest success of the movement was "1942 Police Decree for the Regulation of Bathing" allowed nude swimming if it could be assumed that no one would see.

also literal state mandated forced cuckery like lebensborn?

Lebensborn provided maternity homes for unwed pregnant women and the wives of SS officers to give birth to Aryan offspring in a safe environment.
The entry requirements for the Lebensborn clinics were as strict as for the SS itself. The women had to prove that both they and the father were of Aryan stock back to their grandparents. Modern equipment and qualified staff made the clinics popular with the pregnant wives of SS and Nazi officials as well.
In the case of single mothers, the newborn was assigned to be adopted by a childless couple in good social standing if the mother did not want to raise the baby. There was no mandatory sex or forced impregnation.
Historians have refuted the public's perception that it was a system of Nazi stud farms where SS zealots mated with each other. But it was an integral part of a murderous racial policy that stretched from the forced sterilization of people with hereditary diseases to the killing of 6 million Jews.
Founded in 1935, Lebensborn was designed to halt the high rate of abortions in Germany which rose as high as 800,000 a year in the inter-war years because of a chronic shortage of men to marry after World War I. Its aim was to prevent 100,000 abortions and its statute stated that it was to support "racially and genetically valuable families with many children."
It enabled unmarried pregnant women to avoid social stigma by giving birth anonymously away from their homes, often under the pretext of needing a long-term recuperation. About 60 percent of Lebensborn mothers were unmarried. Lebensborn ran children's homes and an adoption service if the mother didn't want to keep the child.

It even had its own registry office system to keep true identities secret. Most documents were burnt at the end of the war. That, together with the refusal of many Lebensborn mothers to tell their children about the program, has made it very difficult to find the truth
"There are still a lot of myths around the Lebensborn program, that for example, they were breeding centers for the SS," said Dorothee Schmitz-Köster, who wrote a book on the program called "German Mother, Are You Prepared?" "There is almost a pornographic aspect to it in many people's minds, which meant for decades it simply wasn't talked about."

Dorothee Schmitz-Köster, Deutsche Mutter, bist du bereit

"German mother, are you prepared..." is the title of the book on Lebensborn centersImage: Aufbau Verlag
Not stud farms

Despite the stubborn belief that the Lebensborn program was about bringing blond-haired SS officers together with rosy-cheeked German girls for the sake of baby-making, the real story is somewhat less titillating.

Since the beginning of the 20th century, the birth rate in Germany had been falling and SS chief Heinrich Himmler (photo) wanted to reverse the trend, especially as he must have known Germany was soon to have more territory that would need to be populated by those the Nazis deemed genetically acceptable -- healthy, white, non-Jewish, preferably Nordic.

Heinrich Himmler

Heinrich HimmlerImage: dpa
In 1935, he formed the Lebensborn association and two years later opened the first maternity home in Bavaria, in Steinhöring outside of Munich. It was a place that offered an attractive alternative to a home or hospital birth to many women, especially single ones.

At that time, being an unwed mother carried an enormous social stigma and could even result in a woman being fired from some jobs, not to mention ostracized from her family. The Lebensborn homes offered unwed mothers a place to go have their baby in secret, in pleasant surroundings, with top-notch pre-natal care.

"We were treated like princesses," reminisced one woman in an interview who brought her baby into the world at one of the homes.

"I continue to find it fascinating how intelligently the Nazis enacted their policies," Schmitz-Köster said. "They entered into this moral hornet's nest, the issue of unwed mothers, and made women a very attractive offer that fit perfectly with their own social goals."

With the Lebensborn homes, Himmler could ensure that these women did not abort their babies and therefore could keep the country's birth rate up. At the same time it allowed him to pursue his goal of creating a future nation of "racially pure" people.

Genetic criteria

Of course, not every woman was accepted into the homes. A woman did not have to show a marriage certificate, but she and the father did have to provide documentation that they were "Aryan" and healthy. In fact, the proof of racial suitability had to extend back to both parents' grandparents.

Those with Jewish kin, a disability or genetic disease, or a connection with any of the other "undesirable" groups would find the Lebensborn doors slammed in their faces. And although most babies who were born in the homes received high-quality care, those children born disabled were sometimes dispatched to euthanasia clinics where they were poisoned or starved to death.

Ausflug im Lebensborn-Heim

A walk with the children at a Lebensborn homeImage: DW-WORLD
While many of the women in the homes were unwed mothers, who were granted anonymity and whose births were not recorded on official registered, wives of higher-ranking party members also often chose the Lebensborn program to carry out their pregnancies.

It's not clear exactly how many children were born in the homes, since official records were kept only in special Lebensborn registers, many of which of burned in the closing days of the war. Schmitz-Köster estimates around 6,000 babies were delivered in the 10 homes in Germany and the other scattered throughout occupied Europe. Others put that number between 7,000 and 8,000.
SS officers and Wehrmacht soldiers in occupied territories had voluntary affairs that sometimes resulted in the woman getting pregnant out of wedlock, but even in occupied Norway which was allegedly the centre stage for the Lebensborn program the births accounted for 3% or less of German troops stationed there.
However, in one country, the Lebensborn registers, which are more complete, show some 12,000 babies came into the world there fathered by members of the German occupying forces.

Norway was one of the center stages of the program and the Nazis set up 10 maternity homes there. The Norwegians came closest to the Nazis' Aryan ideal -- namely blond and blue-eyed. Himmler was eager to encourage the production of babies of mixed German and Norwegian parentage.

Because Nazi Germany saw Norway as a country filled with "blood brothers and sisters," the occupation of the country was generally much less harsh than in other places. At the time, Norway had a population of three million and there were some 400,000 German soldiers stationed there. A good deal of mixing took place and the Lebensborn homes were very willing to pick up where the German soldier left off.

and nazi sex orgy

it seems like nazis were completely ok with all sorts of degenerate shit as long as they were done by the whites
Jfl clickbait jewspaper articles never cite a source or print the denominator for those alleged 900 pregnancies.

"For example, during the 1936 Nuremberg rally attended by 100,000 boys and girls aged 15-18, 900 girls became pregnant.
(Brendan John Elliott, Hitler and Germany, Longman, 1991, p.69)
Front Cover

Assuming equal numbers of boy and girl attendees, a teenage pregancy rate of 900 per 50000 or 18 in 1000 is lower than the 2010 rates for 49 out of 50 US states.
Compared to britbongs of that era, the Nazi youths were not especially degenerate either:
>1941: Throughout the 1940s, the teenage birth rate rose from 15.0 in every thousand in 1941 to 21.3 [per 1000].
>1959: By the end of the 1950s, the number of teenage births had risen nearly 50%, from 33,000 in 1955 to 46,000, a rate of 31.6 per thousand.

The Nazi Party didn't condone out-of-wedlock births, though I have no idea how accurate is the claim that they ordered the girls to have abortions.
The exhibition sheds light on some of the darker consequences of these gatherings, where mixed-gender events such as the Nuremberg Rallies resulted in hundreds of teenage pregnancies. At the 1936 Rally, around nine hundred girls fell pregnant to the utter horror of the puritanical Nazi hierarchy. How many of these girls fell pregnant as a result of sexual molestation is not recorded, but the number of unwed mothers led the Party to order the unwed girls to have abortions.
but hitler was an anti-christian though

after judaism, his next target was christianity (christianity is an offshoot of judaism anyway, so makes sense, because Jesus was a jew himself?)
Being anti-occult isn't an endorsement of Christcuckery and I never said in the post or anywhere that Hitler supported Cuckstianity. JFL you didn't read past the first line.