okaysomevampires
Active member
Could civilization keep going if my least favorite 7 billion people decided to only have like a few million kids instead of a few billion kids?
Thank you!
Thank you!
Politics Feasibility of rapid global population changes
- Thread starter okaysomevampires
- Start date
Weebhunter3000
mess with crash u get the bash, the moid, the wolf
You'd be dealing with an aging population that would strain social services. Then you would have to deal with a smaller workforce which wouldn't be able to maintain the infrastructure. It wouldn’t really cause a collapse but a lot of boomers would die.
Swede Immigrant
Well-known member
Oh no! Anyways…
Yeah. It would actually make civilization prosper more than anything.
1Based Frog1
Well-known member
Depends on who’s left. If it’s the competent few million, civilization would probably thrive. If it’s just a random mix, you’d get a slow collapse as infrastructure and knowledge degrade over generations.
Spas
Well-known member
We just kill the elderly, they were never meant to live so long anyways
And where is your proof for this claim?
Spas
Well-known member
>say the most unhinged thing ever
>get taken seriously
Weebhunter3000
mess with crash u get the bash, the moid, the wolf
I know a few leftists that would agree with this.
panchito
surf it
i do suppose its the best mix of people together because he said his favorite group of people, and i doubt anyone's favorite group of people here are the group of people we already know are the least competent
Last edited:
panchito
surf it
it's not a problem of them being old but of them being so pissy about modern society when they were the foundations for its collapse
they were the kike's first pawn for all this mess
1Based Frog1
Well-known member
I see what you did there.
