DirtyCurryCell
Well-known member
These are two religions that often used tossed back and forth about which is more peaceful and ideal. And the answer is NEITHER.
The core of Buddhism is none-self, the idea the ego is a hallucination. The Chinese were able to take this to it's logical conclusion by combining it with Daoism and Confucianism and wage bloody wars and enjoy your leisure time to the fullest. As you should. You're not a big deal, eat all you want, fuck all you want, so long as it's not a detriment to your health and obliterate your enemies. South Asian, West Asian and South East Asian Buddhist Kingdoms didn't wage as many wars, but when the wars did come, the monks mainly stepped aside and let the King handle it instead of intervening. Instead of going, But we're a non violent religion of peace, RREEEEEEEEE. Which is what retards want you to believe.
Now for Christianity. First, Christianity waged a literal crusade against sandniggers who tried to invade it and they did it wearing a cross on their chest. In the 90s, they stabbed bosnian women to death with bayonnets with the virgin mary strapped to them. But as for the actual theology, Jesus was no soy boy. He literally took a whip and chased shopkeepers out of the temple. The whole Jesus hung was homeless and hung with prostitutes is complete BS. He told a whore not to be a whore. JFL. Him being a gay homeless guy who was friends with whores is modern revisionism. Not to mention Jesus was Strong enough to carry a cross across the desert.
So where does this BS about either religion being tame come from?
The industrial revolution happened, and there was a fat fuck named marx, who saw that kids who normally at that age would've had to work in their parents farm, now had to work in factories, and he went, religion, bad capitalism bad, waaah waaah waaah.
Christians lost their spine and went, actually jesus was peaceful, seee, the crusades were all our fault, not jesuss (even though it was literally the sandnigger's and the joos).
Meanwhile a bunch of fedora tippers went about looking at other foreign religions and found buddhism, which they had a very surface level understanding of, they knew nothing buddhist social dynamics and said "see this religion right here is the shit", and these buddhists who were living in third world shit holes at the time and needed the white man's approval and financing said "uhh... yeah, that's right... we're peace full."
Then all eyes fell on Pislam.
The world was relatively Peaceful at this time due to Pax Britania, and the imaams just said "Islam just means peace, bro. We were only defending ourselves, we swear." And we thought it was all find and dandy.
But it's not.
Because for all of human history, we have lived through war and chaos, and these religions evolved as a way for people to cope with war and chaos. None of these "peaceful", and none of these were meant to operate in peaceful times. This is why theocracies fall apart after achieving their goals.
The core of Buddhism is none-self, the idea the ego is a hallucination. The Chinese were able to take this to it's logical conclusion by combining it with Daoism and Confucianism and wage bloody wars and enjoy your leisure time to the fullest. As you should. You're not a big deal, eat all you want, fuck all you want, so long as it's not a detriment to your health and obliterate your enemies. South Asian, West Asian and South East Asian Buddhist Kingdoms didn't wage as many wars, but when the wars did come, the monks mainly stepped aside and let the King handle it instead of intervening. Instead of going, But we're a non violent religion of peace, RREEEEEEEEE. Which is what retards want you to believe.
Now for Christianity. First, Christianity waged a literal crusade against sandniggers who tried to invade it and they did it wearing a cross on their chest. In the 90s, they stabbed bosnian women to death with bayonnets with the virgin mary strapped to them. But as for the actual theology, Jesus was no soy boy. He literally took a whip and chased shopkeepers out of the temple. The whole Jesus hung was homeless and hung with prostitutes is complete BS. He told a whore not to be a whore. JFL. Him being a gay homeless guy who was friends with whores is modern revisionism. Not to mention Jesus was Strong enough to carry a cross across the desert.
So where does this BS about either religion being tame come from?
The industrial revolution happened, and there was a fat fuck named marx, who saw that kids who normally at that age would've had to work in their parents farm, now had to work in factories, and he went, religion, bad capitalism bad, waaah waaah waaah.
Christians lost their spine and went, actually jesus was peaceful, seee, the crusades were all our fault, not jesuss (even though it was literally the sandnigger's and the joos).
Meanwhile a bunch of fedora tippers went about looking at other foreign religions and found buddhism, which they had a very surface level understanding of, they knew nothing buddhist social dynamics and said "see this religion right here is the shit", and these buddhists who were living in third world shit holes at the time and needed the white man's approval and financing said "uhh... yeah, that's right... we're peace full."
Then all eyes fell on Pislam.
The world was relatively Peaceful at this time due to Pax Britania, and the imaams just said "Islam just means peace, bro. We were only defending ourselves, we swear." And we thought it was all find and dandy.
But it's not.
Because for all of human history, we have lived through war and chaos, and these religions evolved as a way for people to cope with war and chaos. None of these "peaceful", and none of these were meant to operate in peaceful times. This is why theocracies fall apart after achieving their goals.
