chuds.life
Chuds.life is a forum dedicated to discussing politically incorrect content. You can sign-up to create an account or you may post as a guest. Please read our rules as guest posters have restricted privileges.

Biggest arguments against Anglo Saxon supremacy

Joined
Feb 1, 2024
Messages
41
Disclaimer: I am not a libtard or leftist. In my personal opinion, I believe East Asians and Europeans are both high races. BUT, I have a dilemma for those who oppose race-mixing. Here are some interesting statistical facts I found, feel free to debunk them if you have information to the contrary.

Fact 1: The country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people is the same country with the most East Eurasian/mongoloid genetics.
Explanation: Don't believe me? A quick google search will show it for yourself;

Blue-eyes percentage of population per country: Finland is No.1. with 89% having blue eyes
Blonde-hair percentage of population per country: Finland is No.1. with 80% having blonde hair

This map shows the frequencies of East Eurasian (ancient mongoloid genetics as a whole) in Europe. As you can see, Finns have an average of 10% mongoloid admixture. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/East_Eurasian_admixture_in_Europe.png
This map shows the frequencies of East Asian genetics, that is alleles directly shared with the East and Southeast Asian populations of today. Again, Finland has some of the highest in Europe, alongside Russians. https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-o8GauBOC...-lHRt4wCLcBGAs/s1600/East-Asian-admixture.gif
The East Asian genetic admixture is almost as high in Finns and Northern Norwegians as it is in Turks. Interesting right?

The And if we take into account the fact that many white nationalists do not consider Slavs or Turks to be European, this could imply that that the country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people in Europe is the same country with the East Eurasian/mongoloid genetics. Mind blown.

Argument 1.1: Some WNs do not consider the Finns to be white Europeans for that very reason (10% mongoloid admixture), but view them also as subhumans
Explanation:
If instead we were to consider their arguments that the Finns are not white Europeans, logically this would mean from the previous points that
the country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people is not a white European country. Which is quite ironic, since both blonde hair and blue eyes are quintessentially the epitome of European traits according to these same WN groups, and to think that the country with the biggest percentage of such traits is not white European is quite fascinating.

Any thoughts on this dilemma? I am interested on what you think.
 
Last edited:
The racial purity spiraling among WN is pretty dumb. But I wouldn't say mixed Whites like the Finnish people are comparable to their pure-blooded counterparts. The Germans and The Romans created the greatest empires in human history, while mixed White Mongoloids have little to show in comparison.
 
I don't have one on hand but you should filter 90% of "these guys are like these guys who are descended from these guys" through those graphs where nations are mapped by genetic similarity along a couple of synthetic-yet-objective abstract dimensions. In the last one I saw I remember some things distinctly about germans and finns. Most turks are way way out there on the other side of a chasm of blank space between europe and the rest of eurasia, some scattered into the eurobubble. Finns/ukrainians/moldovians are a corner on the edge of the europe bubble but directly adjacent to the baltic ones and some other bunch of nationalities- I think it was like the czech and those types? Finns were diagonally adjacent to germans in the crack between these two other types and I imagine swedes were in that four-way somewhere.

For comparison, some other (slightly more isolated IIRC) outliers on the other edges of the european bubble were the sardinians and the basque. Although I suppose if you put the Sami on the chart they would at minimum stick out of the bubble as well.

I think that genetics might take some time to settle into stable patterns. A "10% mongoloid admixture" abstracts away whether the guy got that admixture from 1 pure mongoloid great-great-grandfather and 1 quarter-mongoloid great-great-grandmother (a relatively recent event) or whether that same degree of "admixture" has been filtered and integrated over dozens of generations. Some of the largest racial differences are in things like spinal nerve patterns and nerve differentiation- those details seem like things where "energy of the hybrid" could either seriously screw you up hopelessly or serve you a jackpot of novel intelligence and experience. It also seems like something where such a hapa's good luck might not crystalize across generations if his kids don't inherit all the requisite traits by chance of recombination.

I suspect that genes given uninterrupted time to organize in a population have a tendency to regulate attraction so as to move valuable genes around social structures in stable patterns. We know that MHC complexes (sexy smell pheromones) do some anti-incest regulation to protect diversity of immunological capacity in a population. What if some similar administrative functionality naturally occurs for successful hybrids? Maybe this doesn't work if you don't have a traditional clan structure, like most places in the west right now. (in a similar way to how the incest smell detection works better in matriarchal social structures ala hudderites because women can be more picky breeders)

TL;DR: if you have to make a hapa, prefer to work on further whitening some quality white-hapas instead of starting from scratch on asians. Also, raise your kids in a religious commune like with the amish or a cult or something.
 
The racial purity spiraling among WN is pretty dumb. But I wouldn't say mixed Whites like the Finnish people are comparable to their pure-blooded counterparts. The Germans and The Romans created the greatest empires in human history, while mixed White Mongoloids have little to show in comparison.
tsmt, they're only known today for having eurobuxx and no inmigrants because of their language
 
The British Empire is why I’m speaking to you in English and not some forgotten Turkic dialect from the Middle Ages. You’re welcome
The British Empire was heavily influenced by Jews though. And they went around conquering the world by cheating:

"The opium trade was legal within China between 1858 and 1917. Jewish entrepreneurs who had immigrated to China via India were deeply involved in the trade in this addictive, highly debilitating narcotic drug." https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf...,addictive, highly debilitating narcotic drug.

Who else do you think loves to each nation by cheating? That's right: the Jews. The Anglo Saxon nations (Britain, America) are some of the biggest enablers of the Jews having abolished slavery and letting Jews disproportionately own Hollywood and the media.
In contrast, I think the Germans were more on the right path in forging a world empire that did not weaken their own people through Jewish influence.
 
The British Empire is why I’m speaking to you in English and not some forgotten Turkic dialect from the Middle Ages. You’re welcome
la chose amusante, c'est que si les britanniques avaient perdu la Guerre de Sept Ans, la domination française aurait surpassé celle des britanniques, donc nous parlerions français au lieu de l'anglais
de ChatGPT:
The war that significantly contributed to British dominance over the French worldwide was the Seven Years' War (1756-1763). This global conflict involved most of the great powers of the time and is often considered the first "world war" because it spanned Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Asia.
In North America, the Seven Years' War is often referred to as the French and Indian War. The conflict between Britain and France in the American colonies played a crucial role in determining control over vast colonial territories.
The Treaty of Paris in 1763, which concluded the war, had significant consequences for the global balance of power. Under the terms of the treaty:
  1. Canada: France ceded Canada to Great Britain.
  2. India: The British East India Company gained control of French territories in India.
  3. Louisiana: France ceded the territory of Louisiana to Spain.
These territorial changes marked a shift in global dominance, with Great Britain emerging as a more powerful colonial empire. The Seven Years' War weakened the French colonial presence and strengthened the British Empire, setting the stage for British dominance in various parts of the world. The effects of this war had long-lasting impacts on the geopolitical landscape and contributed to the eventual rise of the British Empire as a dominant global power.
 
Last edited:
The British Empire was heavily influenced by Jews though. And they went around conquering the world by cheating:

"The opium trade was legal within China between 1858 and 1917. Jewish entrepreneurs who had immigrated to China via India were deeply involved in the trade in this addictive, highly debilitating narcotic drug." https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1462169X.1999.10511922#:~:text=The opium trade was legal,addictive, highly debilitating narcotic drug.

Who else do you think loves to each nation by cheating? That's right: the Jews. The Anglo Saxon nations (Britain, America) are some of the biggest enablers of the Jews having abolished slavery and letting Jews disproportionately own Hollywood and the media.
In contrast, I think the Germans were more on the right path in forging a world empire that did not weaken their own people through Jewish influence.
I like how Jews can point out anything they've done throughout history, but when a non-Jew does it, it's apparently an antisemetic conspiracy theory.
 
Disclaimer: I am not a libtard or leftist. In my personal opinion, I believe East Asians and Europeans are both high races. BUT, I have a dilemma for those who oppose race-mixing. Here are some interesting statistical facts I found, feel free to debunk them if you have information to the contrary.

Fact 1: The country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people is the same country with the most East Eurasian/mongoloid genetics.
Explanation: Don't believe me? A quick google search will show it for yourself;

Blue-eyes percentage of population per country: Finland is No.1. with 89% having blue eyes
Blonde-hair percentage of population per country: Finland is No.1. with 80% having blonde hair

This map shows the frequencies of East Eurasian (ancient mongoloid genetics as a whole) in Europe. As you can see, Finns have an average of 10% mongoloid admixture. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/East_Eurasian_admixture_in_Europe.png
This map shows the frequencies of East Asian genetics, that is alleles directly shared with the East and Southeast Asian populations of today. Again, Finland has some of the highest in Europe, alongside Russians. https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-o8GauBOC...-lHRt4wCLcBGAs/s1600/East-Asian-admixture.gif
The East Asian genetic admixture is almost as high in Finns and Northern Norwegians as it is in Turks. Interesting right?

The And if we take into account the fact that many white nationalists do not consider Slavs or Turks to be European, this could imply that that the country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people in Europe is the same country with the East Eurasian/mongoloid genetics. Mind blown.

Argument 1.1: Some WNs do not consider the Finns to be white Europeans for that very reason (10% mongoloid admixture), but view them also as subhumans
Explanation:
If instead we were to consider their arguments that the Finns are not white Europeans, logically this would mean from the previous points that
the country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people is not a white European country. Which is quite ironic, since both blonde hair and blue eyes are quintessentially the epitome of European traits according to these same WN groups, and to think that the country with the biggest percentage of such traits is not white European is quite fascinating.

Any thoughts on this dilemma? I am interested on what you think.
1. Finns have less East Asian than Northern Russians. Finns max out at 7% Mongoloid as per my G25 calculator, which is definitely more reliable than just looking at components from Dodecad.
Screenshot 2024-02-01 194251.png


Code:
Yamnaya_RUS_Samara,0.1255849,0.089028,0.0426986,0.1153479,-0.0287232,0.0450564,0.0036033,-0.0025642,-0.0559032,-0.0728943,0.0018222,3.34e-05,-0.0026924,-0.0233041,0.0366141,0.0157633,-0.0012316,-0.0017879,-0.0038408,0.0137704,-0.0031749,0.0007557,0.0110649,0.0186102,-0.004537
WHG,0.1246365,0.116278,0.184789,0.189279,0.1546445,0.0464355,0.0131605,0.0372675,0.0891725,0.017768,-0.0152645,-0.015736,0.015832,-0.0030275,0.053406,0.058273,0.00502,0.016343,-0.0093015,0.055589,0.0944585,0.0111905,-0.049607,-0.160806,0.0170645
TUR_Marmara_Barcin_N,0.1181049,0.1812478,0.0024244,-0.100484,0.0518483,-0.0468005,-0.0050917,-0.0071866,0.0366683,0.081182,0.0085293,0.0118038,-0.0232901,0.0009437,-0.0412654,-0.009155,0.0223267,0.0006696,0.0116241,-0.0095938,-0.0132444,0.0059706,-0.0044663,-0.0033969,-0.0055028
Levant_Natufian_EpiP,0.0267485,0.143697,-0.030924,-0.138245,0.034468,-0.0805995,-0.0179785,-0.0201915,0.112693,0.0056495,0.0286615,-0.02248,0.0766345,-0.001239,0.0138435,0.006033,-0.0107565,-0.0005705,-0.0194205,0.0322655,0.003556,-0.000804,-0.0025885,-0.0037355,0.004371
MAR_Taforalt,-0.189857,0.0814452,-0.0242866,-0.085595,0.027636,-0.0552202,-0.0705968,0.0184146,0.155397,0.003499,0.0209156,-0.0318316,0.0747168,-0.0513334,0.0711988,-0.0363032,0.0052676,-0.066106,-0.1424162,0.0389938,-0.0376836,-0.1255322,0.0730118,-0.0137606,0.0164534
IRN_Ganj_Dareh_N,0.0430252,0.0664158,-0.1550722,0.0047158,-0.122669,0.0235384,0.017109,-0.0011998,-0.082546,-0.0544158,-0.0028258,-0.0016186,0.0044896,-0.0062756,0.0316498,0.0561384,-0.0054242,0.0068664,0.0136508,-0.0334162,0.00856,-0.028836,-0.0110678,-0.039331,0.0222254
GEO_CHG,0.091058,0.102568,-0.083344,-0.00323,-0.08617,0.020638,0.024911,-0.001846,-0.128236,-0.074717,-0.006333,0.023979,-0.054856,0.004404,0.026601,-0.03275,0.02386,-0.013429,-0.022249,0.034767,0.033815,-0.007048,0.006532,-0.025787,-0.002036
Yoruba,-0.6300625,0.0625011,0.022113,0.0167079,0.0005035,0.0124741,-0.044417,0.0477673,-0.0488813,0.0327694,0.0046205,0.0007904,0.0230561,0.0009509,0.0125232,-0.0096067,0.0070763,0.0004491,0.006022,-0.00299,0.0015542,0.0023156,-0.0017592,-0.0004711,-0.0004246
Dinka,-0.577083,0.0507765,-0.0003773,-0.0075098,-0.0053855,-0.0016735,-0.0176848,0.0204222,0.081145,-0.0969495,-0.02107,0.022742,-0.0383172,-0.0011698,0.0101452,-0.021347,0.0186125,-0.0094382,0.0241968,-0.0241678,0.002402,0.003308,0.001479,0.0009038,0.0096995
RUS_Shamanka_N,0.0309599,-0.4147422,0.0950344,-0.0157947,-0.0868469,-0.0482203,0.0053815,0.010061,0.0147054,0.0125196,-0.0160603,-0.0018137,0.0035828,-0.0078032,-0.0046552,-0.0032088,-0.0025164,0.0005827,0.0064608,0.0178333,-0.0170449,-0.0059478,-0.0165151,-0.0032051,0.0046943
Han,0.0254964,-0.4441926,0.0088248,-0.0643416,0.0505322,0.020415,0.0067212,0.0033692,-0.0136212,0.0037906,-0.076355,-0.01142,0.0121306,-0.0083674,-0.0050218,0,0.0025556,-0.0011656,-0.0014832,-0.004377,0.0109056,0.0073698,0.0085288,-0.001687,-0.001868
Onge,-0.0225251,-0.2445288,-0.1324289,0.095965,0.0299327,-0.0047557,-0.0076438,0.0075786,0.0548233,0.0244388,0.023495,0.0032182,-0.0040608,0.0084746,-0.0126933,-0.0111446,0.010918,-0.0016203,-0.0059807,0.0288295,-0.0037107,0.0096905,-0.0128242,-0.0011225,0.0043426
CHN_Tarim_EMBA1,0.1024407,-0.1020145,0.0724415,0.2024339,-0.1150705,0.0468284,-0.0488607,-0.0607316,-0.0422248,-0.0966016,0.0281819,-0.0135289,0.0246371,-0.0711008,0.0259348,0.0231912,-0.0195695,-0.0016125,0.0011998,-0.0060484,-0.0502636,0.0072393,0.0237195,0.0138464,-0.0086437


Either way, it's pretty marginal especially in the blondest of finns, who live in the south and west. Finns have blondism/blue eyes at high rates because they selected strongly for it and because they have high hunter gatherer ancestry from Scandinavia and Baltic HGs.

1.1 Finns are European. Slavs are European. Nobody is actually seriously making the case that they are not European, it's just trolling. Turks are not European, but for a variety of reasons. Case closed.

This argument isn't even an actual argument against anything, it's just a rhetorical jab.
 
The British Empire was heavily influenced by Jews though. And they went around conquering the world by cheating:

"The opium trade was legal within China between 1858 and 1917. Jewish entrepreneurs who had immigrated to China via India were deeply involved in the trade in this addictive, highly debilitating narcotic drug." https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1462169X.1999.10511922#:~:text=The opium trade was legal,addictive, highly debilitating narcotic drug.

Who else do you think loves to each nation by cheating? That's right: the Jews. The Anglo Saxon nations (Britain, America) are some of the biggest enablers of the Jews having abolished slavery and letting Jews disproportionately own Hollywood and the media.
In contrast, I think the Germans were more on the right path in forging a world empire that did not weaken their own people through Jewish influence.
Which is why I'm not at all concerned with "continental European" struggles. Go fix your own problems.
 
Which is why I'm not at all concerned with "continental European" struggles. Go fix your own problems.
To add most of this shit, whether you like Jews or not the endgame of the other is total European decolonization, which leads to “kill whitey” unfortunately.
 
I should also add saxon hate is also just "check your privilege" for swarthoid far right types. It's no different than niggers demanding apologies from the larger "white european descended peoples"
 
Disclaimer: I am not a libtard or leftist. In my personal opinion, I believe East Asians and Europeans are both high races. BUT, I have a dilemma for those who oppose race-mixing. Here are some interesting statistical facts I found, feel free to debunk them if you have information to the contrary.

Fact 1: The country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people is the same country with the most East Eurasian/mongoloid genetics.
Explanation: Don't believe me? A quick google search will show it for yourself;

Blue-eyes percentage of population per country: Finland is No.1. with 89% having blue eyes
Blonde-hair percentage of population per country: Finland is No.1. with 80% having blonde hair

This map shows the frequencies of East Eurasian (ancient mongoloid genetics as a whole) in Europe. As you can see, Finns have an average of 10% mongoloid admixture. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/14/East_Eurasian_admixture_in_Europe.png
This map shows the frequencies of East Asian genetics, that is alleles directly shared with the East and Southeast Asian populations of today. Again, Finland has some of the highest in Europe, alongside Russians. https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-o8GauBOC...-lHRt4wCLcBGAs/s1600/East-Asian-admixture.gif
The East Asian genetic admixture is almost as high in Finns and Northern Norwegians as it is in Turks. Interesting right?

The And if we take into account the fact that many white nationalists do not consider Slavs or Turks to be European, this could imply that that the country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people in Europe is the same country with the East Eurasian/mongoloid genetics. Mind blown.

Argument 1.1: Some WNs do not consider the Finns to be white Europeans for that very reason (10% mongoloid admixture), but view them also as subhumans
Explanation:
If instead we were to consider their arguments that the Finns are not white Europeans, logically this would mean from the previous points that
the country with the highest percentage of blonde-haired and blue-eyed people is not a white European country. Which is quite ironic, since both blonde hair and blue eyes are quintessentially the epitome of European traits according to these same WN groups, and to think that the country with the biggest percentage of such traits is not white European is quite fascinating.

Any thoughts on this dilemma? I am interested on what you think.
Interesting post mr. Aleksandr Dugin
1707568276965.png
1707568373490.png

LONG LIVE THE RUSSIAN EMPIRERE. URAAA
 
Interesting post mr. Aleksandr Dugin
View attachment 11647View attachment 11648
LONG LIVE THE RUSSIAN EMPIRERE. URAAA
The Reason Why I said "Anglo-Saxons are the Jews of Europe." Is Because the Anglo-Saxons and Jews share the same Nature they like taking over nations and fucking up the Native-Populations the Anglo-Saxons and Jews LOVE Money and Power and Aswell as that the Anglo-Saxons were in control of the whole world and were doing the same things to the world as what the Jews are doing to the world right now and for along time The Anglo-Saxons were Manipulating and in Control of the World Market and Economy and the World Trade as a whole.
 
The Reason Why I said "Anglo-Saxons are the Jews of Europe." Is Because the Anglo-Saxons and Jews share the same Nature they like taking over nations and fucking up the Native-Populations the Anglo-Saxons and Jews LOVE Money and Power and Aswell as that the Anglo-Saxons were in control of the whole world and were doing the same things to the world as what the Jews are doing to the world right now and for along time The Anglo-Saxons were Manipulating and in Control of the World Market and Economy and the World Trade as a whole.
Then every empire that colonized other countries are are like jews. The francs, the romans etc etc .Even NatSoc Germany wanted to have colonies, are they like jews to? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum
 
Last edited:
Then every empire that colonized other countries are are like jews. The francs, the romans etc etc .Even NatSoc Germany wanted to have colonies, are they like jews to? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensraum
The difference between all of those Empires and Nations the Anglo-Saxons had for along time controlled the World trade and Economy and even hepled the Jews against the Arabs and The Turks and Helped the Jews with their slave-trade.
 
Why do people call Britain an "Anglo Saxon nation"? Half of Scotland and Wales are areas of Celtic heritage, even the south west of England has Celtic heritage. It is almost like people wish to brush this history over as the word Celtic reminds them of us Irish.
(((they))) want to look more powerful than they are
 
Why do people call Britain an "Anglo Saxon nation"? Half of Scotland and Wales are areas of Celtic heritage, even the south west of England has Celtic heritage. It is almost like people wish to brush this history over as the word Celtic reminds them of us Irish.
I'm both, English on my fathers side, Scottish on my mothers
 
The Reason Why I said "Anglo-Saxons are the Jews of Europe." Is Because the Anglo-Saxons and Jews share the same Nature they like taking over nations and fucking up the Native-Populations the Anglo-Saxons and Jews LOVE Money and Power and Aswell as that the Anglo-Saxons were in control of the whole world and were doing the same things to the world as what the Jews are doing to the world right now and for along time The Anglo-Saxons were Manipulating and in Control of the World Market and Economy and the World Trade as a whole.
Well, you just told on yourself. Keyword here is “indigenous peoples”. So, by that estimation, do you want all nations returned to their native populace? Because if that’s the case, then whitey has to leave everywhere at the end of the day.
 
Well, you just told on yourself. Keyword here is “indigenous peoples”. So, by that estimation, do you want all nations returned to their native populace? Because if that’s the case, then whitey has to leave everywhere at the end of the day.
In North America there was a European group called the "Solutreans" from Ice-Age France came to North America 14,000 Years before the "Native Americans" Who werent here first, And for the past century after this discovery the Jews and the Government censored this and destroyed all Solutrean Artifacts, Burial Grounds, And Bodies, Anyways Europeans were in North America before some Asians came in via the bering-strait, And they the Solutreans found out about North America when the Antlantic Ocean was frozen over. So yeah whitey was here first.
 
In North America there was a European group called the "Solutreans" from Ice-Age France came to North America 14,000 Years before the "Native Americans" Who werent here first, And for the past century after this discovery the Jews and the Government censored this and destroyed all Solutrean Artifacts, Burial Grounds, And Bodies, Anyways Europeans were in North America before some Asians came in via the bering-strait, And they the Solutreans found out about North America when the Antlantic Ocean was frozen over. So yeah whitey was here first.
sovrce
 
Back
Top Bottom